Two Responses to Modernism: Minimalism and New Complexity in Solo Flute Repertoire by Twila Dawn Bakker Bachelor of Arts, Univer

Two Responses to Modernism: Minimalism and New Complexity in Solo Flute Repertoire by Twila Dawn Bakker Bachelor of Arts, Univer

Two Responses to Modernism: Minimalism and New Complexity in Solo Flute Repertoire by Twila Dawn Bakker Bachelor of Arts, University of Alberta, 2008 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the School of Music Twila Dawn Bakker, 2011 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-80349-3 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-80349-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformément à la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privée, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont été enlevés de thesis. cette thèse. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. ii Supervisory Committee Two Responses to Modernism: Minimalism and New Complexity in Solo Flute Repertoire by Twila Dawn Bakker Bachelor of Arts, University of Alberta, 2008 Supervisory Committee Dr. Jonathan Goldman, School of Music Supervisor Dr. Michelle Fillion, School of Music Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Jonathan Goldman, School of Music Supervisor Dr. Michelle Fillion, School of Music Departmental Member Wind repertoire, especially for flute, has received little focused attention in the musicological world especially when compared with other instruments. This gap in scholarship is further exacerbated when the scope of time is narrowed to the last quarter of the twentieth century. Although Minimalism and New Complexity are – at least superficially – highly divergent styles of composition, they both exhibit aspects of a response to modernism. An examination of emblematic examples from the repertoire for solo flute (or recorder), specifically focusing on: Louis Andriessen’s Ende (1981); James Dillon’s Sgothan (1984), Brian Ferneyhough’s Carceri d’Invenzione IIb (1984), Superscripto (1981), and Unity Capsule (1975); Philip Glass’s Arabesque in Memoriam (1988); Henryk Górecki’s Valentine Piece (1996); and Steve Reich’s Vermont Counterpoint (1982), allows for the similarities in both genre’s response to modernism to be highlighted. These works are situated historically and characteristics of both styles are highlighted with particular regard to Late or Post-Modernism. iv Table of Contents Supervisory Committee ...................................................................................................... ii Abstract.............................................................................................................................. iii Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................iv List of Tables.......................................................................................................................v List of Figures.....................................................................................................................vi Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ vii Dedication........................................................................................................................ viii Preface .................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Features of Late Modernist Music ......................................................................9 Post-Modern Origins .....................................................................................................10 What is Post-Modernism in Music? ..............................................................................12 Chapter 2 The Varieties of Minimalist Music: a Geographic Approach...........................18 Characteristics of Minimalism ......................................................................................21 Minimalism as a Style in the Late Modern Era.............................................................26 The Development of Minimalism in America: San Francisco to New York.................28 Minimalism in Holland and the Legacy of Louis Andriessen.......................................35 The Sacred Minimalists: Tavener, Pärt, Górecki...........................................................40 Chapter 3 Minimalism in Solo Flute Repertoire: Analysis of Emblematic Works by Reich, Glass, Andriessen and Górecki ..............................................................................45 Vermont Counterpoint – Steve Reich ............................................................................45 Arabesque in Memoriam – Philip Glass........................................................................50 Ende – Louis Andriessen ...............................................................................................53 Valentines for Solo Flute – Henryk Górecki..................................................................55 Chapter 4 The Development of New Complexity: a Geographic Approach.....................62 Characteristics of New Complexity...............................................................................63 New Complexity as a Style in the Late Modern Era .....................................................67 The Development of New Complexity in the United Kingdom....................................69 New Complexity at Darmstadt ......................................................................................71 Chapter 5 New Complexity in Solo Flute Repertoire: Analysis of Emblematic Works by Ferneyhough and Dillon ....................................................................................................76 Unity Capsule – Brian Ferneyhough .............................................................................76 Superscripto – Brian Ferneyhough................................................................................82 Carceri d’Invenzione IIb – Brian Ferneyhough ............................................................85 Sgothan – James Dillon .................................................................................................87 Chapter 6 Conclusions.......................................................................................................91 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................95 Scores ..........................................................................................................................100 Selected Discography ..................................................................................................100 Appendix A Textural Analysis of Steve Reich’s Vermont Counterpoint .......................101 v List of Tables Table 0.1. Timeline of select compositions for wind instruments involving techniques of Minimalism and New Complexity, between 1975 and 1996. .............................................7 Table 1.1. Post-Modern characteristics as a means of definition. .....................................14 Table 2.1. Common characteristics of minimal music. .....................................................22 Table 3.1. Overview of formal elements in Steve Reich's Vermont Counterpoint. ..........48 Table 3.2. Presentation of musical motives in Arabesque in Memoriam by Philip Glass.52 Table 3.3. Utilization of time signatures in Louis Andriessen's Ende...............................54 Table 3.4. The development of the initial motivic cell in the opening material of the three sections of Henryk Górecki’s Valentine Piece..................................................................59 Table 4.1. Summary of stances held by five composers associated with the New Complexity movement. .....................................................................................................66 Table 4.2. Winners of the Komposition Kranichsteinerpreis.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    111 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us