Value Theory Intro Philosophy

Value Theory Intro Philosophy

Ted Sider Value Theory Intro Philosophy 1. Evaluative concepts Concepts that involve evaluation, or application of standards. Examples include right, wrong, ought, good, bad, justice, fairness, virtue, beauty… 2. Evaluative stances Different branches of value theory study different sorts of evaluations: evalua- tions from different “stances” or “points of view”: Ethics The study of moral evaluative concepts Aesthetics The study of aesthetic evaluative concepts (such as beauty) Political philosophy The study of evaluative concepts concerning societies (such as: what makes governments legitimate? must we obey them?) 3. Sub-branches of ethics Normative ethics The study of conduct—how ought we to behave? Axiology The study of goodness—what makes the world a better place? Virtue theory The study of character traits, both good and bad Meta-ethics The study of the status of ethical judgments (such as whether they are objectively correct) Applied ethics The study of speci c, concrete, real-world ethical issues (such as abortion, euthanasia, and animal rights) 1 4. Normative ethics Normative ethics is about evaluating how we act. What is acceptable to do, what is wrong to do, and what is obligatory to do? A simplistic theory: The Golden Rule An action (done by any person, in any circumstances) is morally obligatory if and only if the person doing the action prefers to have other people do similar actions to her A more realistic, and historically important, theory: Utilitarianism An action is morally obligatory if and only if it would produce a better balance of pleasure over pain in the world than would any other alternate action Some points in its favor: • Pleasure seems intrinsically good; pain seems intrinsically bad • Everyone’s pleasure/pain counts equally • “Rules” can be outweighed if enough pain is at stake • Enables criticism of society’s morality An objection to utilitarianism: imagine a hospital administrator who has the option of killing an innocent janitor, harvesting his organs, and using them to save the lives of several dying patients. 1. If utilitarianism is true, then the administrator ought to kill the janitor 2. The administrator ought not to kill the janitor 3. Therefore, utilitarianism is not true 2.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us