Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Trifluridine and Tipiracilin Bulk and Their Combined Dosage Form

Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Trifluridine and Tipiracilin Bulk and Their Combined Dosage Form

International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN (USA): IJCRGG, ISSN: 0974-4290, ISSN(Online):2455-9555 Vol.12 No.04, pp 117-126, 2019 Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Trifluridine and Tipiracilin Bulk and their Combined Dosage form Sk.Mastanamma*, K.Nagaraju, Sk. Reehana, V. Radhakrishnaveni Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, University College of pharmaceutical science, AcharyaNagarjuna University, Nagarjunanagar, Guntur –522510. Andhra Pradesh (India). Abstract : The present work describes Development and validation of stability indicating RP- HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Trifluridine and Tipiracilin bulk and their combined dosage form. The chromatographic separation was performed on Column :XterraC18 (150mm x 4.5mm x 5µ) using Trietylamine buffer: Acetonitrile (40:60) as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and column oven temperature of 30ºC. The detection was carried out using a Diode array detector at 272 nm. Total run time was 10 minutes within which main compounds and their degradation products were separated. The method was validated for accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, robustness, linearity, limit of detection and quantification were established. The developed method was successfully applied to the simultaneous quantitative analysis of the title drugs in tablet dosage forms. Keywords : Stability indicating assay, RP-HPLC, Trifluridine and Tipiracilin, Forced degradation studies. Introduction Trifluridine: chemically 1-[(2R,4S,5R)-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,3,4-tetra hydropyrimidine-2,4-dione[1].Trifluridine is metabolized by the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase to 5- trifluoromethyl-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione (FTY), and also by glucuronidationis. It has a molecular formula of C10H11F3N2O5 and a molecular weight- 296.19 g/mol, Freely soluble in water, Freely soluble in methanol and in ethanol Slightly soluble in diethyl ether. It has the following structural formula as shown in fig.1a Sk.Mastanamma et al /International Journal of ChemTech Research, 2019,12(4): 117-126. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.20902/IJCTR.2019.120416 Sk.Mastanamma et al /International Journal of ChemTech Research, 2019,12(4): 117-126. 118 Fig.1a. Structure of Trifluridine Fig. 1b. Structure of Tipiracil Tipiracil: chemically 5-Chloro-6-[(2-imino-1-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione[2].Tipiracil is a thymidine phosphorylase (TPase) inhibitor and inhibits degradation of trifluridine by inhibiting TPase, thus increasing systemic exposure to trifluridine when tipiracil is given together with trifluridine.. It has a molecular formula of C9H11ClN4O2 and a molecular weight- 242.67g/mol, freely soluble in water, NaOH,HCL Slightly soluble in methanol and in ethanol practically insoluble in acetone. It has the following structural formula as shown in fig.1b. The literature survey reveals that there are few HPLC and spectroscopic methods available for the determination individual Trifluridine and Tipiracil in bulk and dosage forms. Different acivity were developed by using crude extracts of plants[3-10]. There were no reported analytical methods for simultaneous estimation Trifluridine and Tipiracil in bulk and their combined dosage forms in presence of their degradation products. Hence an author made an attempt to develop stability indicating specific, sensitive, accurate and precise RP- HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of these drugs. The developed method was validated as per ICH Q2 guidelines. Materials and Methods Chemicals and reagents: Working standards of Trifluridine and Tipiracil were obtained as gift samples from NATCO Pharma, Hyderabad, India. HPLC grade Acetonitrile was purchased from Merck (Mumbai, India), HPLC grade Water (Milli Q or equivalent) all chemicals (AR Grade) were used for entire study. Instrumentation: All HPLC experiments were carried out on a Waters Alliance 2690 separation module, with waters 2996 photodiode array detector using Auto sampler. Data collection and processing was done using Empower PDA 2 software. The analytical column used for the separation was XterraC18, 150mm x 4.5mm, 5µm Column, Other equipments used were ultra-sonicator (Remi), Analytical balance (OHUAS) PH meter (EU TECH). Preparation of solutions: Buffer: Mix 1ml Triethyl amine in 1litre water adjust pH-3 with OPA. Mobile phase: Mix Acetonitirile and Buffer in the ratio of 60+40.Filter through 0.46lµ membrane filter paper. Diluent: Mobile phase is used as diluents. Preparation of the Trifluridine & Tipiracil Standard & Sample Solution: Standard Solution Preparation: Accurately weigh and transfer 20mg & 9mg of Trifluridine & Tipiracil working standard into a 10ml clean dry volumetric flask add Diluent and sonicate to dissolve it completely and make volume up to the mark with the same solvent (Stock solution). Further pipette 1.0 ml of Trifluridine & Tipiracil of the above stock solution into a 10ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with diluent.Further pipette 1.5 ml of Trifluridine & Tipiracil of the above stock solution into a 10ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with diluent. Sk.Mastanamma et al /International Journal of ChemTech Research, 2019,12(4): 117-126. 119 Method Development: The optimized chromatographic conditions (fig no-6.13).The best peak shape and maximum separation was achieved with mobile phase composition of Acetonitrile and Buffer using (60:40) ,peak symmetry and reproducibility were obtained on XterraC18,150mm x 4.6mm, 5µm Column. The optimum wavelength for detecting the analytes was found to be 272nm, a flow rate of 1ml/min yielded optimum separation and peak symmetry. The optimized chromatographic conditions were shown table 1 and fig.2. Fig.2: A Typical Chromatogram of TFD and TPR (optimized) Table.1. Optimized Chromatographic Conditions: Column Xterra C18,4.5 × 150µm Mobile phase ACN+Buffer (TEA) (60+40) Flow rate 1 mL /min Column temperature 30°C Injection volume 10 µL Detection Wavelength 272 nm Run time 10 minutes Retention time 2.016(TFD),3.471(TPR)min Table.2. Linearity Studies of Proposed Method: Parameters Trifluridine Tipiracil Linearity range (µg/ml) 10-50(µg/ml) 4.5-22.5(µg/ml) Regresion equation y = 34215x - 14106 y = 30967x – 9559.5 Slope 34215 30967 Intercept 14106 9559.5 Correlation coefficient (r) 0.999 0.999 LOD (µg/ml) 0.090 0.162 LOQ (µg/ml) 0.360 0.446 To saturate the column, the mobile phase was pumped for about 30 minutes thereby to get the base line corrected. The separate standard calibration lines were constructed for each drug. A series of aliquots were prepared from the above stock solutions using diluent to get the concentrations 4.5-22.5μg/ml for Tiiracil, 10- 50μg/ml for Trifluridine. Each concentration 6 times was injected in to chromatographic system. Each time peak area and retention time were recorded separately for all the drugs. Calibration curves were constructed as by taking average peak area on Y-axis and concentration on X-axis separately for both drugs. From the calibration curves regression equations were calculated, these regression equations were used to calculate drug content in formulation. The obtained results were shown table. 2. Sk.Mastanamma et al /International Journal of ChemTech Research, 2019,12(4): 117-126. 120 Estimation of Trifluridine and Tipiracil in tablet dosage forms: Weigh 20 tablets and crush to powdered then take accurately weigh and transfer equivalent to 20mg & 9mg of Trifluridine &Tipiracil sample into a 10ml clean dry volumetric flask add about 7ml of Diluent and sonicate to dissolve it completely and make volume up to the mark with the same solvent (Stock solution).Further pipette 1.0 ml of Trifluridine & Tipiracil of the above stock solution into a 10ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with diluent.Further pipette 1.5 ml of Trifluridine & Tipiracilthe above stock solution into a 10ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with diluents. This solution was estimated by above developed method. The assay procedure was repeated 6 times (n=6) the drug content was estimated using above calculated regression equation; the results of tablet dosage form are shown in the table 3. Table.3. Results of Tablet dosage form: Test Mean amount Compound Brand Label claim concentration estimated %Assay %RSD name name (mg) (µg/ml) (μg/mL) (n=6) Trifluridine 20 30 30.105 100.35 0.362 Lansurf Tipiracil 8.9 13.5 13.61 100.68 0.095 Method Validation: The analytical method was validated for various parameters as per ICH guidelines Linearity: The linearity of the method was determined in concentration range of 4.5-22.5 μg/ml for Tipiracil, 10- 50 μg/ml for Trifluridine. Each solution was injected in triplicate. The average peak area versus concentration data of both drugs was treated by least squares linear regression analysis and the results obtained from as shown in tables 2. Specificity and Selectivity: Specificity is the degree to which the procedure applies to a single analyte and is checked in each analysis by examining blank matrix samples for any interfering peaks. The specificity of the method was evaluated with regard to interference due to presence of any other placebos. Two different samples were injected and studied with respective placebos. The HPLC chromatograms recorded for the drug matrix (mixture of the drug and placebos) showed almost no interfering peaks with in retention time ranges. Fig.2shows the chromatograms for Trifluridine and Tipiracil with Blank and Placebo. The figures shows that the selected drugs were cleanly separated. Thus the HPLC method proposed in this study was selective. Accuracy : Accuracy is expressed as the closeness of the results from standard samples to that of the actual known amounts to determine the accuracy of the proposed method, recovery studies were carried out in different recovery levels (50%, 100% and 150%) by adding placebo to the pre-analyzed formulation .the solutions were suitably diluted in the range and then each of the dilution was observed 6 times.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us