Chapter 2. Oceanographic Conditions

Chapter 2. Oceanographic Conditions

Chapter 2. Oceanographic Conditions INTRODUCTION explain patterns of bacteriological occurrence (see Chapter 3) or other effects of the SBOO discharge The fate of wastewater discharged into deep offshore on the marine environment (see Chapters 4–7). waters is strongly determined by oceanographic conditions and other events that suppress or facilitate horizontal and vertical mixing. Consequently, MATERIALS and METHODS measurements of physical and chemical parameters such as water temperature, salinity and density Field Sampling are important components of ocean monitoring programs because these properties determine Oceanographic measurements were collected at 40 water column mixing potential (Bowden 1975). fi xed sampling sites located from 3.4 km to 14.6 km Analysis of the spatial and temporal variability offshore (Figure 2.1). These stations form a grid of these parameters as well as transmissivity, encompassing an area of approximately 450 km2 dissolved oxygen, pH, and chlorophyll may also and were generally situated along 9, 19, 28, 38, elucidate patterns of water mass movement. and 55-m depth contours. Three of these stations Taken together, analysis of such measurements (I25, I26, and I39) are considered kelp bed stations for the receiving waters surrounding the South subject to the California Ocean Plan (COP) water Bay Ocean Outfall (SBOO) can help: (1) describe contact standards. The three kelp stations were deviations from expected patterns, (2) reveal the utfall impact of the wastewater plume relative to other oma O PointL San ! San inputs such as San Diego Bay and the Tijuana I38 Diego Diego Bay River, (3) determine the extent to which water I37 ! I35 I36 ! ! mass movement or mixing affects the dispersion/ I34 ! I33 dilution potential for discharged materials, and ! (4) demonstrate the infl uence of natural events I30 I31 I28 I29 ! I32 such as storms or El Niño/La Niña oscillations. ! ! ! ! LA4 In addition, combining measurements of physical I26 I27! I39 ! ! parameters with assessments of bacteriological I21 I25 I20 ! ! ! I22 ! ! I23 I24 ! Tijuana River concentrations (see Chapter 3) can provide further ! I40 I16 !I14 Outfall I13 SouthBay ! ! ! ! U.S. insight into the transport potential surrounding the I15 ! I18 I19 ! I12 ! I17 Mexico SBOO throughout the year. I7 I8 I10 ! ! ! I9 I11 ! 150m ! 100 m I6 To assess possible impacts from the outfall ! discharge, the City of San Diego regularly monitors MEXICO I1 I2 ! ! I4 I5 I3 ! ! oceanographic conditions of the water column. ! 55m m m 28 19 38 m Although, water quality in the South Bay region 19 m 9m is naturally variable, it is also subject to various 4 anthropogenic and natural sources of contamination km such as discharge from the SBOO, San Diego Bay 0 1 2 3 4 5 and the Tijuana River. This chapter describes the Figure 2.1 oceanographic conditions that occurred during Water quality monitoring stations where CTD casts are taken, South Bay Ocean Outfall Monitoring Program. 2004 and is referred to in subsequent chapters to 9 selected for their proximity to suitable substrates month during the rainy season and a lesser number for the Imperial Beach kelp bed; however, this kelp during the dry season. bed has been historically transient and inconsistent in terms of size and density (North 1991, North et al. 1993). Thus, these three stations are located in RESULTS and DISCUSSION an area where kelp is only occasionally found. Expected Seasonal Patterns of Physical and Oceanographic measurements were collected at Chemical Parameters least once per month over a 3–5 day period. Values for temperature, salinity, density, pH, transmissivity Southern California weather can be classifi ed (water clarity), chlorophyll a, and dissolved oxygen into two basic “seasons”, wet (winter) and dry were recorded by lowering a SeaBird conductivity, (spring through fall), and certain patterns in temperature and depth (CTD) instrument through oceanographic conditions track these “seasons.” the water column. Profiles of each parameter In the winters, water temperatures are cold were constructed for each station by averaging and the water column is well-mixed resulting the values recorded over 1-m depth intervals in similar properties throughout the water during processing. This ensured that physical column. In contrast, dry summer weather warms measurements used in subsequent data analyses the surface waters and introduces thermally­ corresponded with bacterial sampling depths. sustained stratification. Despite a sampling Further details regarding CTD data processing schedule that limits oceanographers to snapshots are provided in the City’s Quality Assurance in time spread out over several days during each Plan (City of San Diego in prep.). To meet the month, analyses of oceanographic data collected COP sampling frequency requirements for kelp from the South Bay region over the past nine bed areas, CTD casts were conducted at the kelp years support this pattern. stations an additional four times each month. Visual observations of weather and water conditions were Each year, typical winter conditions are present recorded prior to each CTD sampling event. in January and February. A high degree of homogeneity within the water column is the Monitoring of the SBOO area and neighboring normal winter signature for all physical parameters, coastline also included satellite and aerial although storm water runoff may intermittently remote sensing performed by Ocean Imaging infl uence density profiles by causing a freshwater Corporation (OI). Satellite imagery included lens within nearshore surface waters. The chance data collected from both Moderate Resolution that the wastewater plume may surface is highest Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Landsat during these winter months when there is little, if Thematic Mapper (TM) instrumentation. The any, stratifi cation of the water column. aerial imaging was done using OI’s DMSC-MKII digital multispectral sensor (DMSC). Its four Winter conditions often extend into March, when a channels were configured to a specifi c wavelength decrease in the frequency of winter storms brings (color) combination, determined by OI’s previous about the transition of seasons. The increasing research, which maximizes the detection of the elevation of the sun and lengthening days begin to SBOO plume’s turbidity signature, while also warm the surface waters and cause the return of a allowing separation between the outfall plume seasonal thermocline and pycnocline to coastal and and coastal discharges and turbidity. The depth offshore waters. Once stratification is established penetration of the imaging varies between 8 and by late spring, minimal mixing conditions tend to 15 meters, depending on general water clarity. The remain throughout the summer and early fall. In spatial resolution of the data is usually 2 meters. October or November, cooler weather, reduced Several aerial overflights were performed each solar input, and increased stormy weather cause 10 6 Historical Mean 5 2004 4 3 2 Rain in Inches 1 0 -1 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Month Figure 2.2 Total monthly rainfall at Lindbergh Field (San Diego, CA) for 2004 compared to monthly average rainfall (+/- 1 standard deviation) for the historical period 1914–2004. the return of the well-mixed, homogeneous water from 13.8 to 14.2°C in January–March. Seasonal column characteristic of winter months. warming of the surface water began in April, progressed gradually, and peaked in September Observed Seasonal Patterns of Physical and when mean surface temperatures reached 22.2°C Chemical Parameters (Table 2.1). This pattern of a steady, gradual rise in surface temperatures was much different than With the exception of greater than normal rainfall in 2003, when temperature was more variable and during February, drought conditions persisted peaked in July rather than September (City of San from January through the fi rst half of October in Diego 2004a). A relatively rapid decline in surface 2004 (Figure 2.2; NOAA/NWS 2005). Record temperatures then occurred from September to rainfall occurred during the second half of October October (~5°C) and from November to December followed by below normal rainfall in November (~2.5°C). In contrast, bottom temperatures were and then record rainfall again in December. less variable, ranging from 10.3 to 14.4°C. Bottom Despite these circumstances, thermal patterns temperatures decreased from 12.8°C in January of the water column followed normal seasonal to 10.3°C in June, and then gradually increased to trends at the nearshore and offshore sampling areas 14.4°C by December. This pattern was generally (Figures 2.3, 2.4). similar to the previous year, although compared to 2003, 2004 bottom temperatures were 1–2°C Temperature is the main factor affecting stratifi cation cooler in January and February and about 1°C of southern California ocean waters (Dailey et. warmer in November and December. al. 1993) and provides the best indication of the surfacing potential of the wastewater plume. Surface and mid-level water temperatures dipped During 2004, surface water temperatures ranged several times during the year (i.e., May, July, 11 25 Surface 20 Bottom 15 Temperature 10 26 25 24 Density 23 34.0 33.5 Salinity 33.0 32.5 90 80 70 60 Transmissivity 50 10 9 8 7 6 5 Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved 20 15 10 5 Chlorophyll a Chlorophyll 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 2.3 Monthly average temperature (°C), density (δ/θ), salinity (ppt), transmissivity (%), dissolved oxygen (mg/L), and chlorophyll a (µg/L) values for surface (≤ 2m) and bottom (≥ 18m) waters at the three kelp water quality stations during 2004. 12 25 Surface 20 Mid-depth Bottom 15 10 Temperature 5 26 25 24 Density 23 22 33.8 33.6 33.4 Salinity 33.2 33.0 95 90 85 80 75 Transmissivity 70 9 8 7 6 5 4 Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved 10 8 6 4 2 Chlorophyll a Chlorophyll 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 2.4 Monthly average temperature (°C), density (δ/θ), salinity (ppt), transmissivity (%), dissolved oxygen (mg/L), and chlorophyll a (µg/L) values for surface (≤ 2m), mid-depth (10–20m), and bottom (≥ 27m) waters at the monthly water quality stations during 2004.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us