Maximally Edge-Connected and Vertex-Connected Graphs and Digraphs: a Survey Angelika Hellwiga, Lutz Volkmannb,∗

Maximally Edge-Connected and Vertex-Connected Graphs and Digraphs: a Survey Angelika Hellwiga, Lutz Volkmannb,∗

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Discrete Mathematics 308 (2008) 3265–3296 www.elsevier.com/locate/disc Maximally edge-connected and vertex-connected graphs and digraphs: A survey Angelika Hellwiga, Lutz Volkmannb,∗ aInstitut für Medizinische Statistik, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, PauwelsstraYe 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany bLehrstuhl II für Mathematik, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany Received 8 December 2005; received in revised form 15 June 2007; accepted 24 June 2007 Available online 24 August 2007 Abstract Let D be a graph or a digraph. If (D) is the minimum degree, (D) the edge-connectivity and (D) the vertex-connectivity, then (D) (D) (D) is a well-known basic relationship between these parameters. The graph or digraph D is called maximally edge- connected if (D) = (D) and maximally vertex-connected if (D) = (D). In this survey we mainly present sufficient conditions for graphs and digraphs to be maximally edge-connected as well as maximally vertex-connected. We also discuss the concept of conditional or restricted edge-connectivity and vertex-connectivity, respectively. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Connectivity; Edge-connectivity; Vertex-connectivity; Restricted connectivity; Conditional connectivity; Super-edge-connectivity; Local-edge-connectivity; Minimum degree; Degree sequence; Diameter; Girth; Clique number; Line graph 1. Introduction Numerous networks as, for example, transport networks, road networks, electrical networks, telecommunication systems or networks of servers can be modeled by a graph or a digraph. Many attempts have been made to determine how well such a network is ‘connected’ or stated differently how much effort is required to break down communication in the system between some vertices. Clearly, it is desirable that a network stays connected as long as possible in case of faults should arise. Two classical measures that indicate how reliable a graph or a digraph D is are the edge-connectivity (D) and the vertex-connectivity or simply the connectivity (D) of D.If(D) is the minimum degree, then it is well known that (D)(D) and (D)(D). Thus, in order to construct reliable and fault-tolerant networks, sufficient conditions for graphs or digraphs D satisfying (D)=(D) (so-called maximally edge-connected) or (D)=(D) (so- called maximally connected) are of great interest. For the case that graphs or digraphs are maximally edge-connected or connected also further connectivity parameters are needed to investigate the fault tolerance, such as super-edge- connectivity, restricted (edge-)connectivity or local-edge-connectivity. Our objectives are to present results on (edge-)connectivity and maximally (edge)-connected graphs and digraphs. Furthermore, we take a look at the concept of conditional or restricted (edge-)connectivity. ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (A. Hellwig), [email protected] (L. Volkmann). 0012-365X/$ - see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2007.06.035 3266 A. Hellwig, L. Volkmann/ Discrete Mathematics 308 (2008) 3265–3296 For more information on connectivity in graphs we refer the reader to survey articles with different emphases by Fàbrega and Fiol [47], Mader [103], Oellermann [113] and Xu [177] and to the Ph.D. thesis by Hellwig [69]. 2. Some terminology and basic results We consider finite (di-)graphs without loops and multiple edges. For any (di-)graph D the vertex set is denoted by V(D)and the edge set (sometimes called oriented edge set or arc set in the case that D is a digraph) by E(D).We define the order of D by n = n(D) =|V(D)| and the size by m = m(D) =|E(D)|.IfG is a graph, then the vertex degree d(v) = dG(v) of a vertex v is the number of vertices of G adjacent to v. The minimum degree is denoted by = (G) and the maximum degree by = (G). The degree sequence of a graph G is defined as the nonincreasing sequence of the degrees of the vertices of G. For a vertex v ∈ V (G), the open neighborhood N(v)= NG(v) is the set of all vertices adjacent to v, and N[v]=NG[v]=N(v)∪{v} is the closed neighborhood of v.Ife = uv is an edge of a graph G, then let N(e)= NG(e) = (N(u) ∪ N(v))−{u, v}. For X ⊆ V (G) let G[X] be the subgraph of G induced by X. For a connected graph G, the distance d(u, v)=dG(u, v) between two vertices u and v is the length of a shortest path from u to v. The diameter dm(G) of a connected graph G is defined by dm(G) = maxu,v∈V (G) dG(u, v).IfX and Y are two subsets of V (G), then we denote by (X, Y ) the set of edges with one endpoint in X and the other one in Y and by d(X,Y) = dG(X, Y ) = minx∈X, y∈Y dG(x, y) the distance between X and Y. The girth g of a graph is the length of its shortest cycle. A (,g)-cage is a -regular graph with 2 and girth g 3 having the least possible number of vertices. Let p be a positive integer. A (di-)graph D is said to be p-partite if it is possible to partition V(D)into p subsets V1,V2,...,Vp (called partite sets) such that every edge joins a vertex of Vi to a vertex of Vj for i = j.IfG is a p-partite graph such that uv ∈ E(G) for every vertex u ∈ Vi and every v ∈ Vj for i = j, then we speak of a complete p-partite or complete multipartite graph.Forp = 2, such graphs are called bipartite graphs. The complete bipartite graph Kp,q has the bipartition A, B with |A|=p and |B|=q such that for every pair of vertices u ∈ A and v ∈ B there exists the edge uv. A vertex-cut in a graph G is a set X of vertices of G such that G − X is disconnected. The vertex-connectivity or simply the connectivity = (G) of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a vertex-cut of G if G is not complete, and (G) = n − 1ifG is the complete graph Kn of order n.Anedge-cut in a graph G is a set S of edges of G such that G − S is disconnected. If S is a minimal edge-cut of a connected graph G, then, necessarily, G − S consists of exactly two components. Every nontrivial graph has an edge-cut. The edge-connectivity = (G) of a graph G is the minimum ¯ cardinality of an edge-cut of G if G is nontrivial and (K1) = 0. We denote by G the complementary graph of a graph G. A graph G is self-complementary if G = G¯ . For other graph theory terminology we follow Bondy and Murty [21] or Chartrand and Lesniak [29]. Connectivity, edge-connectivity and minimum degree of a graph are related by a basic inequality due to Whitney [171] in 1932. Theorem 2.1 (Whitney [171] 1932). For any graph G, (G)(G)(G). (1) Chartrand and Harary [27] showed that this result is best possible in the sense that if a,b and c are positive integers such that a bc, then there exists a graph G with (G) = a, (G) = b and (G) = c. Because of (1), it is reasonable to say that a graph G is maximally connected if (G) = (G) and maximally edge-connected if (G) = (G). The following result on the diameter of a graph and its complement will be used later, and can be found in the book by Bondy and Murty [21] on p. 14 as an exercise (for a proof cf. [148, p. 19]). Theorem 2.2 (Bondy and Murty [21] 1976). If G is a graph of diameter dm(G)4, then dm(G)¯ 2. Note that Theorem 2.2 generalizes the earlier result by Ringel [133] that a nontrivial self-complementary graph has diameter 2 or 3 as well as the observation that dm(G)3 implies dm(G)¯ 3 by Harary and Robinson [68]. A. Hellwig, L. Volkmann/ Discrete Mathematics 308 (2008) 3265–3296 3267 3. Maximally edge-connected graphs Sufficient conditions for equality of edge-connectivity and minimum degree for graphs were given by several authors. The starting point was an article by Chartrand [26] in 1966. He observed that if is large enough, then the second inequality in (1) becomes an equality. Theorem 3.1 (Chartrand [26] 1966). If G is a graph of order n(G)2(G) + 1, then (G) = (G). In 1974, Lesniak [91] proved the following strengthening of this result. Theorem 3.2 (Lesniak [91] 1974). If G is a graph with dG(u) + dG(v)n(G) − 1 for all distinct non-adjacent vertices u and v, then (G) = (G). One year later, Plesník [127] presented a nice condition based on the diameter that implies Theorems 3.1 and 3.2. Theorem 3.3 (Plesník [127] 1975). If G is a graph of diameter dm(G)2, then (G) = (G). In 1989, Plesník and Znám [128] could relax the condition in Theorem 3.3 in the sense that some distances can be greater than 2. Theorem 3.4 (Plesník and Znám [128] 1989). If in a connected graph G no four vertices u1,v1,u2,v2 with d(u1,u2), d(u1,v2), d(v1,u2), d(v1,v2)3 exist, then (G) = (G). A pair of sets X, Y ⊂ V (G) with dG(X, Y ) = k, where k is a positive integer, is called k-distance maximal, if there exist no sets X1 ⊇ X and Y1 ⊇ Y with X1 = X or Y1 = Y such that dG(X1,Y1) = k.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    32 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us