Coll. Antropol. 41 (2017) 4: ???–??? Short communication Businessman – The Case of Ossoinack Family and Fiume* Krešimir Sučević Međeral Institute for Croatian Language and Linguistics, Zagreb, Croatia ABSTRACT On October 18th 1918 Andrea Ossoinack, the representative of the city of Fiume in the Parliament of Hungary, gave a speech in which he claimed the right of self-determination for his city in the events that led to the dissolution of Austria- Hungary. This claim was a basis for Woodrow Wilson’s 1919 proposal of establishing Fiume as a free state, although Ossoinack himself objected it, favouring annexation to Italy. Less than 14 years earlier, Ossoinack was regarded by Hun- garians as a staunch supporter of close ties between Hungary and Fiume, opposing the Autonomist Party and its claims of separate Fiuman identity, despite the fact that the Autonomist Party was founded and financed by his father Luigi, a wealthy Fiume entrepreneur. The history of Ossoinack family, Slavic by origin and Italian by language, with ethnical identity and affiliations influenced by the economic situation of any given moment in time, demonstrates that even during the period of awakening nation states, a question of ethnic identity was only secondary to business interests. The paper tries to illustrate the rise of the Ossoinack family, mainly focusing on Luigi’s business achievements, and Andrea’s later strivings to ensure the family business survive through the turbulent times of Fiume in the first half of the 20th century, choosing whichever identity necessary in order to achieve that goal. Key words: ethnic identity, Fiume, Italian irredentism, Austria-Hungary Introduction The city of Fiume (today’s Rijeka in the modern state someone’s origin (there was a saying in Fiume at that of Croatia) boasts a remarkable and turbulent past, time quoting “He who does not have a box in the theatre closely tied to its status as a port city of strategical im- and a tomb in the cemetery, is no gentleman”).2 Per- portance for landlocked Hungary. However, being a port sonal wealth was one’s ticket to esteem and honour, so on the Adriatic Sea, its population has always reflected it was less important to lose one’s ethnic identity (often its geographical position, showing a mixture of Italian, already compromised by the fact of one’s parents’ differ- German, Slovene and Croatian-speaking population, ent ethnic backgrounds) than to suffer a financial loss. with Hungarian ethnic element trailing far behind. The One of the most powerful and influential families in city itself was predominantly Italian-speaking, with Fiume, especially during its heyday period (last two people from different ethnic backgrounds having a good decades of 19th and the beginning of the 20th century), command of the language. However, speaking Italian was certainly the Ossoinack family, especially father did not automatically entail the sense of ‘feeling’ Italian and son Luigi and Andrea Ossoinack, whose economic – that will occur in Fiume only with irredentism at the success laid a foundation for reshaping Fiume’s political end of the 19th century, and even then it will initially be scene, which in turn left a powerful impact on Fiume’s of limited scope in comparison to Fiume’s autonomism.1 destiny after the First World War. But who were the Fiume’s identity was mainly focused on the city itself, Ossoinacks, how did they come to build such a powerful on its multiethnic and multicultural population, where economic enterprise and how did that success influence signs of personal wealth were more important for one their political affinities and alignments? These are the to be considered worthy of citizen’s status, than it was questions we would try to present in this article. Received for publication November 17, 2017 * This paper is based on the results of research conducted within the grant project »Historical Perspectives on Transnationalism and Intercultural Dialogue in the Austro-Hungarian Empire« (TIDA), funded by the Croatian Science Foundation (IP-11-2013-3914). 1 K. Sučević Međeral: Businessman – The Case of Ossoinack Family, Coll. Antropol. 41 (2017) 4: ???–??? The Ossoinack family of Giuseppe Nereo (Natalin’s oldest son, who died at sea), become custody of their uncle Luigi, along with his own children. The Ossoinacks appeared for the first time on the stage of Up to this point, it is hard to establish without doubt what th history during the 18 century in Volosko, a tiny fisherman vil- was the ethnic sentiment of the Ossoinacks, partially because it lage west of Fiume, on the eastern coast of Istria. Their origin is was not a pressing issue at the time (early and middle 19th cen- unknown, although the etymology of the name suggests Slavic tury) and partially because most of the family members were (either Slovenian or Croatian) origin – the word osoj means pursuing their business interests (some of them abroad) and not „shady side (of the mountain)“, and there is a village called Oso- being interested in the politics of the city. The only mentioned jnaki („Ossoinacks“) near Matulji, about halfway between Fiume exception is Giovanni, who himself entered politics only after the and Volosko. The first known member of the family is Andrea Fiuman autonomist movement had already been formed, and who (Andrija) Ossoinack, sea captain and trader of olive oil and wine, also shifted his identity and inclinations during his political about whom it is known that he lived in Volosko in 1774.3 His son work. The facts we can be sure about are that the origin of the Giuseppe (Josip) continued his father’s business, trading between surname Ossoinack is Slavic, that most of the family members Fiume, Dalmatia and the Italian lands. He owned several sail- were multilingual, with fluency in Croatian, Italian, German, ships that were all unfortunately destroyed, one of them burned Hungarian, some even in English (which itself is nothing strange, by the French near the island of Vis, and the rest of them lost in considered they were traders living in a multilingual city), and the British siege of Fiume in 1811. The loss of the ships led to that the mother of Natalin’s first wife was of Italian origin, mean- Giuseppe’s financial breakdown and he subsequently moved to ing that at least his first three children could partly consider Fiume in the 1820s, after the death of his first wife, who bore themselves Italian (but we cannot be sure if they indeed did so). him 12 children. Giuseppe’s youngest son was Natalin Gennaro, The language the family members used among themselves was born in 1816, in the middle of his father’s bankruptcy, comple- Italian, which can be established from the family correspondence mented by the death of his mother only a year later. In such – yet, Italian was the lingua franca of Fiume at the time. The circumstances Natalin had to become independent early, so al- names of Natalin’s children were also Italianate (i.e. not just ready as a teenager he started working for his older brothers, Italianized, like Ivan > Giovanni, but typically Italian, like accumulating capital to become a wine merchant and buy a house Nereo or Francesca). Still, as already mentioned, we cannot for sure imply that there was any Italian or irredentist feeling with a tavern on Fiumara, in the centre of Fiume, where ships among the Ossoinacks before Giovanni started leaning towards bringing wine from Dalmatia would dock. He achieved all of that irredentism – in fact, there was not much of it in the whole city by his early twenties. He married Marija Repak, a daughter of a before the end of the 19th century. It is highly probable that, if large carpentry shop owner, who also used to have a small spir- someone had had a chance to ask a member of the Ossoinack it distillery. Her mother was originally from Pesaro, and was a family what their identity was, he would have gotten a simple distant relative of the composer Gioacchino Rossini. They had answer: „Fiumani“. three children before Marija succumbed to cholera in the 1849 th epidemic. Natalin afterwards remarried and had further five By the end of the 19 century, the Fiuman identity would children. develop from just a mere statement of the obvious fact that one was living in a city of that name into a political question, reflect- Apart from the family house on Fiumara, Natalin also owned ing the situation that emerged in Fiume after it became the two other houses in Fiume, and in 1848 he bought an estate in single port city of Hungary. The government of Dezső Bánffy Lopača, north of Fiume, where he built a family villa. He also started a process of powerful Magyarization, trying to centralize used the estate as a source of export timber for his ships. Natalin a multiethnic country in which Hungarians formed only about a had six sons and two daughters. Three of the sons became seafar- half of the population. Expectedly, it met a staunch opposition in ers, two became merchants, while the youngest son, Antonio, Fiume, whose inhabitants always thought of Hungary primarily graduated in chemistry and started working in petroleum indus- as of a political protector of the city’s autonomous rights and not try. He would eventually end in Baku, becoming an owner of an as of some kind of romantic national homeland. Out of this op- oil refinery and then disappearing as a class enemy after the position grew the Autonomist Party, a political subject that would October Revolution. Among the three sons who became seafarers, gather most of the Italian-speaking elite of Fiume.