Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory Napoli, October 2006

Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory Napoli, October 2006

Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory Napoli, October 2006 Thomas Mohaupt University of Liverpool Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.1 Outline 1. Introduction: the laws of black mechanics, the string–black hole correspondence and BPS states. 2. BPS black holes in = 2 compactifications: special geometry, attractor mechanism, N variational principle, and higher derivative corrections. With comments on nonsupersymmetric black holes. 3. OSV conjecture, large and small black holes. 4. Concluding remarks. Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.2 The Laws of Black Hole Mechanics (0) κS = const. κS (1) δM = 8π δA + !δJ + φδq. (2) δA 0. ≥ (3) κS = 0 cannot be reached in finite time by any physical process. ks = surface gravity, M = mass, A = horizon area, ! = horizon angular velocity, J = angular momentum, φ = chemical (= electrostatic) potential, q = electric charge. J.M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S.W. Hawking (1973) Suggests: κ T ; A S S ∼ ∼ where T = temperature and S = Entropy. Assumptions: (0), (1): stationary black hole, (2): ‘predictable’ space-time, Einstein’s field equations satisfied, (dominant/weak) energy condition. However, (0), (1) hold irrespective of the details of the field equations, if appropriate symmetry conditions are imposed! Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.3 The Laws of Black Hole Mechanics (2) Modified assumptions: generally covariant Lagrangian with black hole solution such that (i) black hole is static or stationary, axisymmetric, t φ reflection symmetric, − (ii) event horizon is a Killing horizon, (iii) a Cauchy hypersurface exists. Then (0) κS = const. R. Wald and Racz (1995) κS (1) δM = 2π δS + !δJ + φδq. R. Wald (1993), ... provided that M; J; S; q are defined as appropriate surface charges. Entropy: S = Q[ξ] ZH ξ = ‘horizontal’ Killing vector field, Q = Noether two-form. Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.4 The Laws of Black Hole Mechanics (2) Modified assumptions: generally covariant Lagrangian with black hole solution such that (i) black hole is static or stationary, axisymmetric, t φ reflection symmetric, − (ii) event horizon is a Killing horizon, (iii) a Cauchy hypersurface exists. Then (0) κS = const. R. Wald and Racz (1995) κS (1) δM = 2π δS + !δJ + φδq. R. Wald (1993), ... provided that M; J; S; q are defined as appropriate surface charges. Entropy: δ S = 2π L "µν "ρσphd2Ω δR ZH µνρσ "µν = normal bivector of horizon, phd2Ω = induced volume form. Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.4 Black Hole Thermodynamics Hawking radiation: κS THawking = (GN = c = ~ = 1) : 2π First law: κ δM = S δA + 8π · · · A S = : ) 4 Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.5 Black Hole Thermodynamics Hawking radiation: κS THawking = (GN = c = ~ = 1) : 2π First law (generalized version): κ δM = S δS + 2π · · · A S = + corrections from higher derivative terms 4 Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.5 Black Hole Thermodynamics Hawking radiation: κS THawking = (GN = c = ~ = 1) : 2π First law (generalized version): κ δM = S δS + 2π · · · A S = + corrections from higher derivative terms 4 S = Smacro = thermodynamical or macroscopic entropy. Unterlying microscopic theory (=quantum gravity) should specify the microscopic states of the black hole. Microscopic entropy: Smicro = log d(M; J; q) ; d = #microstates : Expect: Smacro = Smicro : Benchmark for theories of quantum gravity! Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.5 Black Hole Thermodynamics Hawking radiation: κS THawking = (GN = c = ~ = 1) : 2π First law (generalized version): κ δM = S δS + 2π · · · A S = + corrections from higher derivative terms 4 More ambitiously: derive black hole thermodynamics starting from a microscopic partition function. Example: OSV conjecture for supersymmetric black holes. Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.5 The String – Black Hole Correspondence Idea: black hole microstates = string states at large mass or large coupling. Perturbative string regime Semiclassical gravity regime. $ pα0 r pα0 r . S S L. Susskind (1993), G.T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski (1997). Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.6 The String – Black Hole Correspondence Idea: black hole microstates = string states at large mass or large coupling. Perturbative string regime Semiclassical gravity regime. $ pα0 r pα0 r . S S Compare 4d Schwarzschild black hole to open bosonic string (truncated). 2 0 Relation of gravitational and string scale: GN = gS α : String mass formula: α0M 2 n (for large excitation number n) : ≈ String entropy: S = log d(n) pn : String ∼ Schwarzschild radius of string state: r g2 pn pα0 : S ≈ S Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.6 The String – Black Hole Correspondence Idea: black hole microstates = string states at large mass or large coupling. Perturbative string regime Semiclassical gravity regime. $ pα0 r pα0 r . S S Perturbative string in flat space: g2 pn 1 r pα0 ; S S S ) S BH String Semiclassical black hole: g2 pn 1 r pα0 ; S S : S ) S BH String Transition(?): g2 pn 1 r pα0 ; S S : S ≈ ) S ≈ BH ≈ String Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.6 The String – Black Hole Correspondence Idea: black hole microstates = string states at large mass or large coupling. Perturbative string regime Semiclassical gravity regime. $ pα0 r pα0 r . S S Need to interpolate between two accessible regimes. Intermediate regime not under control. Matching of entropies up to (1): O S S : BH ∼ String Consider supersymmetric (BPS) states. A. Strominger and C. Vafa (1996), ... Interpolation more plausible. Can compute Smacro S and S S to high precision in their respective ≡ BH micro ≡ String regimes. Find ‘exact’ matching S S ; BH ≈ String including subleading corrections (in large mass = semiclassical expansion). Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.6 The String – Black Hole Correspondence Idea: black hole microstates = string states at large mass or large coupling. Perturbative string regime Semiclassical gravity regime. $ pα0 r pα0 r . S S Besides fundamental strings, also solitonic p-branes are associated with microscopic degrees of freedom. E.g. the pioneering work of A. Strominger and C. Vafa involved D-branes, rather than fundamental strings. We will discuss examples involving fundamental (and also solitonic) strings later. Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.6 The String – Black Hole Correspondence Idea: black hole microstates = string states at large mass or large coupling. Perturbative string regime Semiclassical gravity regime. $ pα0 r pα0 r . S S Beyond matching numbers: OSV conjecture 2 Z Ztop : BH ≈ j j ZBH = black hole partition function, Ztop = partition function of the topological string. H. Ooguri, A. Strominger and C. Vafa (2004) Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.6 BPS states Supersymmetry algebra (4d, Weyl spinors): + µ Qα; Q = 2σ f β g αβ Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.7 BPS states -extended supersymmetry algebra (4d, Weyl spinors): N QA; Q+B = 2σµ δAB f α β g αβ QA; QB = ZAB f α β g αβ A; B; : : : = 1; : : : ; N. Central charges = skew eigenvalues of ZAB: 2 2 2 M Z1 Z2 0 : ≥ j j ≥ j j ≥ · · · ≥ Saturation of inequalities shortened (BPS) multiplets. ) Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.7 BPS states -extended supersymmetry algebra (4d, Weyl spinors): N QA; Q+B = 2σµ δAB f α β g αβ QA; QB = ZAB f α β g αβ A; B; : : : = 1; : : : ; N. Examples: = 2: N 1. M > Z : generic massive multiplet. j j 2. M = Z : short or 1 -BPS multiplet. j j 2 = 4: N 1. M > Z1 > Z2 : generic massive multiplet. j j j j 1 2. M = Z1 > Z2 : -BPS multiplet. j j j j 4 1 3. M = Z1 = Z2 : -BPS multiplet. j j j j 2 1 Supersymmetric vacua = ‘ 1 -BPS’ (fully supersymmetric). Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.7 BPS solitons BPS states can be realized as finite energy solutions Φ0 of the field equations (asymptotic to vacuum). Killing spinors " residual (rigid) supersymmetry of Φ0: $ δ" Φ = 0 : jΦ0 Example: the extreme Reissner-Nordstrom black hole regarded as a solution of = 2 N Supergravity = Einstein-Maxwell + 2 Gravitini. Has 4 Killing spinors and interpolates between two supersymmetric vacua (8 Killing spinors): Minkowski space at infinity and AdS2 S2 (with covariantly constant gauge fields) at × horizon. G. Gibbons (1982) Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.8 Embedding into string theory String compactifications give supergravity plus matter. We consider: 2 Het=(K3 T ) and type-II/CY3 × = 2 Supergravity + n vector multiplets ( + n hypermultiplets + n tensor −! N V H T multiplets ). Het=T 6 and type-II/(K3 T 2) × = 4 Supergravity + n vector multiplets. −! N V Main tool: specical geometry of = 2 vector multiplets. N B. de Wit and A. Van Proeyen (1984). All vector multiplet couplings are encoded in a holomorphic prepotential. Field equations are invariant under Sp(2nV + 2; ) rotations which generalize the electric-magnetic duality of Maxwell theory, and include stringy symmetries such as T-duality and S-duality. Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.9 Special geometry (1) Multiplets: A i Gravity multiplet: e ; ; µ . f µ µ A g i A Vector multiplet: µ; λ ; z . fA g i = 1; 2, A = 1; : : : ; nV . Bosonic Lagrangian: −1 R A µ B i −I −Ijµν i +I +Ijµν 8πe bos = g (z; z)@µz @ z + IJ (z; z)F F IJ (z; z)F F L − 2 − AB 4 N µν − 4 N µν I = 0; 1; : : : ; nV . I Fµν = (anti-)selfdual part of field strength. To make electric-magnetic duality manifest, define dual field strength: δ G L : Ijµν ' δF Ijµν Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.10 Special Geometry (2) Field equations (not: action) are invariant under Sp(2nV + 2; ) rotations. Symplectic vectors: I I I Fµν p F Gauge fields and charges: ; = 0 1 0 1 0 1 GIjµν qI H GI @ A @ A @ H A XI Scalars: 0 FI 1 @ A A where ‘scalars’ I are related to the physical scalars A by A X and X z z = X0 @F FI = : @XI Prepotential F (X) is holomorphic and homogenous of degree 2: F (λXI ) = λ2F (X) : Supersymmetric Black Holes in String Theory – p.11 Special Geometry (3) Poincaré Supergravity Conformal Supergravity ! nV vector multiplets (nV + 1) vector multiplets Φ 2nV +2 MV M ! CMV M −! XI zA XI 0 FI 1 @ A is a complex cone over .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    75 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us