Lake County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Adopted: October 2010

Lake County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Adopted: October 2010

Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Lake County Lake County Emergency The Polis Center Management Agency IUPUI 2900 West 93rd Street 1200 Waterway Boulevard Crown Point, Indiana Suite 100 Indianapolis, IN 46202 © Lee Lewellen 46307-1854 Lake County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Adopted: October 2010 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Lake County, Indiana Adoption Date: -- _______________________ -- Primary Point of Contact Jodi Richmond Director Lake County Emergency Management Agency 2900 West 93rd Street Crown Point, Indiana 46307-1854 P: 219-755-3549 F: 219-755-3559 [email protected] Secondary Point of Contact Gerry Scheub Lake County Commissioner 219-755-3055 Prepared by: The Polis Center 1200 Waterway Boulevard, Suite 100 Indianapolis, IN 46202 317-274-2455 Page 2 of 303 Lake County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Adopted: October 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 6 2.0 PREREQUISITES ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PLAN ADOPTION ................................................................. 8 2.2 JURISDICTION PARTICIPATION ...................................................................................... 8 3.0 PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................................................... 10 3.1 PLANNING TEAM ............................................................................................................. 10 3.2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................................. 12 3.3 NEIGHBORING COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT .......................................................... 12 3.4 REVIEW OF TECHNICAL AND FISCAL RESOURCES ................................................ 12 3.5 REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS ....................................................................................... 12 4.0 COUNTY PROFILE ................................................................................................................ 14 4.1 TOPOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................... 14 4.2 CLIMATE ............................................................................................................................ 15 4.3 DEMOGRAPHICS ............................................................................................................... 15 4.4 ECONOMY .......................................................................................................................... 16 4.5 INDUSTRY .......................................................................................................................... 16 4.6 COMMUTER PATTERNS .................................................................................................. 17 4.7 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS .................................................................. 17 4.8 MAJOR LAKES, RIVERS, AND WATERSHEDS ............................................................ 20 5.0 RISK ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................................. 22 5.1 IDENTIFYING HAZARDS ................................................................................................. 22 5.1.1 Existing Plans ................................................................................................................ 22 5.1.2 National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Records ......................................................... 22 5.1.3 Hazard Ranking Methodology ...................................................................................... 23 5.1.4 GIS and HAZUS-MH .................................................................................................... 29 5.2 ASSESSING VULNERABILITY ........................................................................................ 30 5.2.1 Essential Facilities List .................................................................................................. 31 5.2.2 Facility Replacement Costs ........................................................................................... 31 5.3 PROFILING HAZARDS ..................................................................................................... 32 5.3.1 TORNADO HAZARD .................................................................................................. 32 HAZUS-MH Tornado Analysis ........................................................................................ 35 Tornado Analysis in Northern Lake County ................................................................... 37 Tornado Analysis in Southern Lake County ................................................................... 41 5.3.2 FLOOD HAZARD ........................................................................................................ 45 HAZUS-MH Analysis Using 100-Year Flood Boundary and County Parcels ................. 51 Lake County (Incorporated and Unincorporated) .......................................................... 52 Page 3 of 303 Lake County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Adopted: October 2010 Town of Cedar Lake ........................................................................................................ 56 City of Crown Point ........................................................................................................ 58 Town of Dyer .................................................................................................................. 60 City of East Chicago ....................................................................................................... 62 City of Gary .................................................................................................................... 65 Town of Griffith .............................................................................................................. 68 City of Hammond ............................................................................................................ 71 Town of Highland ........................................................................................................... 75 City of Hobart ................................................................................................................. 78 City of Lake Station ......................................................................................................... 80 Town of Lowell ................................................................................................................ 82 Town of Merrillville ........................................................................................................ 84 Town of Munster ............................................................................................................. 86 Town of New Chicago ..................................................................................................... 89 Town of Schererville ....................................................................................................... 90 Town of Schneider .......................................................................................................... 93 Town of St. John .............................................................................................................. 95 City of Whiting ................................................................................................................ 97 Town of Winfield ............................................................................................................. 97 5.3.3 EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ........................................................................................ 100 HAZUS-MH Earthquake Analysis .................................................................................. 107 Results for 7.1 Magnitude Earthquake Wabash Valley Scenario ................................. 107 Results for 5.5 Magnitude Earthquake in Lake County ................................................ 109 Results 5.0 Magnitude 500-Year Probabilistic Scenario .............................................. 111 Results Annualized Risk Scenario ................................................................................. 112 5.3.4 THUNDERSTORM HAZARD ................................................................................... 112 5.3.5 WINTER STORM HAZARD ..................................................................................... 124 5.3.7 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RELEASE HAZARD ................................................ 129 HAZUS-MH Hazardous Materials Release Analysis ..................................................... 132 East Chicago Analysis .................................................................................................. 132 Gary/Hammond Analysis .............................................................................................. 142 5.3.8 FIRE HAZARD ........................................................................................................... 150 6.0 MITIGATION STRATEGIES ............................................................................................... 155 6.1 COMMUNITY CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 155 6.1.1 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) ......................................... 155 6.1.2 PLANS

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    303 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us