Enamel Microwear Texture Properties of IGF 11778 (Oreopithecus Bambolii) from the Late Miocene of Baccinello, Italy

Enamel Microwear Texture Properties of IGF 11778 (Oreopithecus Bambolii) from the Late Miocene of Baccinello, Italy

doie-pub 10.4436/JASS.91006 ahead of print JASs Reports doi: 10.4436/jass.89003 Journal of Anthropological Sciences Vol. 91 (2013), pp. 201-217 Enamel microwear texture properties of IGF 11778 (Oreopithecus bambolii) from the late Miocene of Baccinello, Italy Frank L’Engle Williams Department of Anthropology, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3998, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA e mail: [email protected] Summary - Late Miocene Oreopithecus bambolii has been posited as a folivore from its pronounced molar shearing crests. However, scanning electron microscopy yields conflicting results with one study ofOreopithecus showing folivory and another indicating a coarser diet was consumed. To address this debate, the dietary proclivities of the well-known IGF 11778 Oreopithecus bambolii specimen are reconstructed by comparing the enamel texture properties of this specimen to extant Alouatta palliata (n = 11), Cebus apella (n = 13), Gorilla gorilla (n = 9), Lophocebus albigena (n = 15), Pan troglodytes (n = 17) and Trachypithecus cristatus (n = 12). Dental microwear is captured by scanning facet 9, a Phase II facet on the hypoconid surface, using white-light confocal microscopy at 100x. The scanning was followed by scale-sensitive fractal analysis, yielding four texture characteristics. These were ranked before ANOVA with post-hoc tests of significance and multivariate analyses were conducted. Oreopithecus specimen IGF 11778 does not match any of the extant taxa consistently but in some analyses is associated with Lophocebus, and secondarily with Pan, Gorilla and Cebus outliers suggesting mixed-fruit and hard-object feeding characterized at least a portion of its diet. The partially open habitat of late Miocene Baccinello may have had resources with mechanically resistant foods, or foods found near ground level were consumed. Hard, brittle foods, insects, and or extraneous grit may have contributed to the greater use-wear complexity of the enamel surface observed in IGF 11778 compared to extant folivores. IGF 11778 does not exhibit the degree of anisotropy characterizing Trachypithecus and Alouatta. The partial resemblance of IGF 11778 to some great ape specimens may indicate intermittent extractive and or terrestrial foraging. Keywords – Lophocebus, Hard-object feeding, Leaf consumption, Hominoid, Miocene apes. Introduction 1986a,b; Jungers, 1987; Köhler & Moyà-Solà, 1997; Moyà-Solà et al., 1999, 2005; Rook et al., The “1958” or Florence skeleton, is a remark- 1996, 1999, 2004; Sarmiento, 1987; Sarmiento ably complete but severely crushed specimen & Marcus, 2000; Straus, 1962; Susman, 2004, found within the lignitic deposits of Baccinello, 2005; Szalay & Delson, 1979; Szalay & Langdon, Tuscany. The fossil preserves the upper and lower 1987; Wunderlich et al., 1999). limb skeleton, as well as jaws, teeth and cranial Given its unusually primitive morphology fragments providing insight into the relation- (Begun, 2002), the phylogenetic placement ship between the gnathic elements, cranial size of IGF 11778 and other fossils attributed to and locomotion for a single individual. While Oreopithecus has been equivocal (Delson, 1986; more is known about IGF 11778 than any other Rook et al., 1996), echoing debates about the Miocene hominoid individual (Begun, 2002), taxonomic attribution of the first Oreopithecus debate about its diet, taxonomy, anatomy and fossil discovered at Monte Bamboli in 1872 locomotion remain unresolved (Aiello, 1981; (Gentili et al., 1998). A revitalization of inter- Delson, 1986; Drapeau & Ward, 2007; Harrison, est in Oreopithecus occurred with the recovery the JASs is published by the Istituto Italiano di Antropologia www.isita-org.com 202 Enamel microwear textures of IGF 11778 of IGF 11778 (Hürzeler, 1958; Straus, 1958). Macaca and colobines such as Mesopithecus entered Hürzeler (1958, 1960) suggested Oreopithecus Europe using different routes (Gentili et al., 1998; bambolii belonged within the human line- Harrison, 1986a). Oreopithecus was probably the age based on a morphological analysis of IGF last surviving taxon of a broad radiation of west- 11778 and other specimens. Classified within ern European Miocene hominoids. All of them the Cercopithecoidea from its cuspidate molars except Oreopithecus appear to have become extinct and other dental characteristics (Delson, 1986; by about 9.6 Ma during the “Vallesian Crisis” Szalay & Delson, 1979), Oreopithecus was also where deciduous species began to dominate the referred to the Hominoidea on the basis of post- formerly tropical/subtropical landscapes, reflect- cranial characteristics (Rook et al., 1996; Straus, ing increased seasonality (Rook et al., 2000). 1958), and to its own family, the Oreopithecidae Oreopithecus survived the “Vallesian Crisis” (Carnieri & Mallegni, 2003; Harrison, 1986b; in part because of its isolation, in part from its Hürzeler, 1958). useful morphological adaptations but eventu- A reconstruction of the skull of IGF 11778 ally became extinct around 7 Ma when the indicated a resemblance to the great apes Tuscan-Sardinia paleobioprovince reconnected (Clarke, 1997). The preservation of several with peninsular Europe (Casanovas-Vilar et long bones allowed for the relative lengths to al., 2011). The occurrence of Oreopithecus was be compared to other primates, and IGF 11778 bracketed within a time interval between 9.5 and is most similar to female Pongo (Jungers, 1987) 6.0 Ma using biochronological controls from suggesting slow quadramanous arboreal clam- continental Europe (Rook et al., 2000). It was bering. Body size for IGF 11778 from femoral among the most abundant fossil taxa within the head circumference was estimated to be 32 kg pre-Messinian mammal-bearing biostratigraphic with 95% confidence limits providing a range of units of southern Tuscany (Rook et al., 2011). 30.2 - 33.9 kg (Jungers, 1987). This was sur- Baccinello, from which IGF 11778 derives, was prisingly large because the teeth of Oreopithecus dated to the upper Miocene, corresponding to are proportionally small (Jungers, 1990; Rook et MN 12 and MN 13 (Begun, 2002; Gentili et al., 2004). Oreopithecus bambolii can be char- al., 1998). A mean 40Ar/39Ar date of 7.55 ± acterized as microdont given the relatively small 0.03 Ma was obtained from an exposed tephra cheek teeth and canines with respect to recon- from the Passonaio section of the Baccinello- structed body mass (Alba et al., 2001). However, Cinigiano basin, corresponding to the middle of the use of tooth size as a proxy for body size is the Oreopithecus-bearing succession (Rook et al., complicated by outliers, such as Australopithecus 2000). More recently, paleomagnetostratigraphy and Paranthropus (Jungers, 1987). Nevertheless, has been applied to the Baccinello-Cinigiano tooth size, shape and microwear provide unique basin and yielded dates over 8.1 Ma for the old- insights into the dietary ecology of extinct forms. est deposits and between 7.1 and 6.7 Ma for the youngest (Rook et al., 2011). Paleogeographic evidence suggested that the Paleoecology, chronology and environment Oreopithecus inhabited was varied paleogeography and likely included swampy, forested areas and drier uplands (Azzaroli et al., 1986). Oreopithecus Oreopithecus is considered highly autapomor- from Baccinello is part of the Baccinello-Cinigiano phic in its craniodental and postcranial morphol- basin bordered by the Ombrone River valley ogy, possibly stemming from its endemic isolation and the Amiata Mountain in southern Tuscany in the late Miocene Tuscan-Sardinia bioprovince (Benvenuti et al., 2001; Rook et al., 2000) and (Begun, 2002; Gentili et al., 1998). The unique is distinct from other late Miocene bioprovinces fauna of Italy during the late Miocene suggests in Italy (Rook et al., 2006). The Baccinello that Oreopithecus and early papionins such as deposits include four vertebrate-bearing levels. F. L’Engle Williams 203 The V1, V2 and V3 layers were the first to be requirements derived from the consumption of identified as distinct from the F1 and F2 lay- large quantities of leaves or terrestrial herbaceous ers bearing only molluscan faunas. An older vegetation as in Gorilla (Head et al., 2011), or vertebrate-bearing biostratigraphic unit was later leaves, large numbers of insects and other fauna identified as V0 (Benvenuti et al., 2001; Rook et as in Pan (McGrew, 1992). Considering the esti- al., 1996). Oreopithecus bambolii was found in mated body size of Oreopithecus, the relative brain the V0, V1 and V2 biostratigraphic units, but size was small (Harrison, 1986b) perhaps the was replaced by Mesopithecus in V3 (Matson et result of secondary de-encephalization related to al., 2012). The endemic mammalian taxa of the a diet highly concentrated on folivorous resources Tuscan-Sardinian insular region from V0, V1 (Begun, 2002). The high-cusped molars and and V2 differed from continental European and small incisors of Oreopithecus are similar to those African forms and have been identified as the of extant colobines which show a number of Oreopithecus Zone Faunas (Bernor et al., 2001; adaptations to folivory (Szalay & Delson, 1979). Chesi et al., 2009; Delfino & Rook, 2008; Rook Researchers have also relied on dental micro- et al., 2006), an ecological isolate for over 2 Ma. wear to reconstruct the dietary preferences of The extinction of Oreopithecus may have Oreopithecus. For example, Carnieri & Mallegni possibly derived from increased variability in (2003) found a diet consistent with folivory. Ungar flooded zones and in fluvial discharge

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us