The Category of Modules Have Enough Injectives Fix R a Commutative Ring with 1 and Let M Be an R-Module

The Category of Modules Have Enough Injectives Fix R a Commutative Ring with 1 and Let M Be an R-Module

The category of modules have enough injectives Fix R a commutative ring with 1 and let M be an R-module. We want to find an injective R-module I(M) and an injective map e : M → I(M). 1. Construction of I(M) We saw how to construct injective objects in the category of R-Mod. We first note that if we take the divisible group Q we may not get something in- teresting. The problem happens when R is, say for example, Z/pZ. In this case H(Q) = homAbelianGroups(Q, Z/pZ) = 0 and hence this does not give anything useful. However if we take the divisible group to be Q/Z things are much better. Lemma 1. Q Q I := H = homA G R, = 0 0 Z belian roups Z for all rings R. For the proof we use the fact that Q/Z is divisible. Proof. Consider the group homomorphism γ : Z → R given by 1 → 1. There are two cases: either γ is injective, or it has a non-trivial kernel K =∼ kZ, k ≥ 2. Note that k cannot be 1 as γ(1) = 1 and hence γ cannot be the zero map. In case γ is not injective, we have an injective map Z/kZ ֒→ R. Now consider the diagram Z / kZ ÑR 1 Ñ 1→[ k ] Ñ ÐÑ Q Z . Divisibility of Q/Z guarantees the existence of the dotted arrow. Therefore, we have a nontrivial (why?) map from R → Q/Z. In case γ is injective, consider any non-trivial map Z → Q/Z (for example, 1 1 → [ 2 ]) and then it extends to R by the same argument as in the previous case. Existence of a nontrivial map in both the cases imply that I0 = 0. Definition 2. For M an object in R-Mod, define an indexing set A := homR-Mod(M,I0). Define I(M) := I0. YA For sake of making things clear, for α ∈ A and x ∈ I(M), let the α-th component of x be denoted by xα. Corollary 3. Since I0 is defined as H(Q/Z), it is an injective R-module. Hence I(M), being a product of injective R-modules, is an injective R-module too. 2. M embeds into I(M) α Define eM : M → I(M) = A I0 by (eM (m)) = α(m) where α ∈ A = homR-Mod(M,I0). Q Exercise 4. Check that eM : M → I(M) is an R-module homomorphism. Proposition 5. eM is injective. 1 2 Proof. We have to show that eM (m) = 0 implies m = 0. But eM (m) = 0 just means f(m)=0 for all f ∈ homR-Mod(M,I0). We now prove by contradiction. Suppose m = 0. We construct an f : M → I0, an R-module homomor- phism such that f(m) = 0. Note that such an f belongs to homR-Mod(M,I0) = ∼ homR-Mod(M, homAbelianGroups(R, Q/Z)) = homAbelianGroups(M, Q/Z). Exercise 6. Check that if we construct a group homomorphism g : M → Q/Z belonging to the last group above satisfying g(m) = 0, the corresponding map f belonging to homR-Mod(M,I0) satisfies f(m) = 0. To construct such a g look at the abelian group homomorphism Z → M given by 1 → m. Check that the arguments in lemma 1 gives such a g. .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us