Is the Convex Polytope in Rn+1 Defined As the Convex Hull of All Permutations of the Vector (X1

Is the Convex Polytope in Rn+1 Defined As the Convex Hull of All Permutations of the Vector (X1

PERMUTOHEDRA, ASSOCIAHEDRA, AND BEYOND ALEXANDER POSTNIKOV Abstract. The volume and the number of lattice points of the permutohedron Pn are given by certain multivariate polynomials that have remarkable com- binatorial properties. We give 3 different formulas for these polynomials. We also study a more general class of polytopes that includes the permutohedron, the associahedron, the cyclohedron, the Stanley-Pitman polytope, and various generalized associahedra related to wonderful compactifications of De Concini- Procesi. These polytopes are constructed as Minkowsky sums of simplices. We calculate their volumes and describe their combinatorial structure. The coef- ficients of monomials in Vol Pn are certain positive integer numbers, which we call the mixed Eulerian numbers. These numbers are equal to the mixed volumes of hypersimplices. Various specializations of these numbers give the usual Eulerian numbers, the Catalan numbers, the numbers (n+1)n−1 of trees (or parking functions), the binomial coefficients, etc. We calculate the mixed Eulerian numbers using certain binary trees. Many results are extended to an arbitrary Weyl group. 1. Permutohedron Let x1; : : : ; xn+1 be real numbers. The permutohedron Pn(x1; : : : ; xn+1) is the convex polytope in Rn+1 defined as the convex hull of all permutations of the vector (x1; : : : ; xn+1): Pn(x1; : : : ; xn+1) := ConvexHull((xw(1); : : : ; xw(n+1)) j w 2 Sn+1); where Sn+1 is the symmetric group. Actually, this is an n-dimensional polytope that belongs to some hyperplane H ⊂ Rn+1. More generally, for a Weyl group W , we can define the weight polytope as a convex hull of a Weyl group orbit: PW (x) := ConvexHull(w(x) j w 2 W ); where x is a point in the weight space on which the Weyl group acts. For example, for n = 2 and distinct x1; x2; x3, the permutohedron P2(x1; x2; x3) (type A2 weight polytope) is the hexagon shown below. If some of the numbers x1; x2; x3 are equal to each other then the permutohedron degenerates into a trian- gle, or even a single point. Date: November 21, 2004; based on transparencies dated July 26, 2004. Key words and phrases. Permutohedron, associahedron, Minkowsky sum, mixed volume, Weyl's character formula, Hall's marriage theorem, wonderful compactification, nested families, generalized Catalan numbers, Stanley-Pitman polytope, parking functions, hypersimplices, mixed Eulerian numbers, binary trees, shifted tableaux, Gelfand-Zetlin patterns. 1 2 ALEXANDER POSTNIKOV (x1; x2; x3) P2(x1; x2; x3) = Question: What is the volume of the permutohedron Vn := Vol Pn? n+1 Since Pn does not have the full dimension in R , one needs to be careful with definition of the volume. We assume that the volume form Vol is normalized so that the volume of a unit parallelepiped formed by generators of the integer lattice Zn+1 \ H is 1. More generally, we can ask the following question. n+1 Question: What is the number of lattice points Nn := Pn \ Z ? We will see that both Vn and Nn are polynomials of degree n in the variables x1; : : : ; xn+1. The polynomial Vn is the top homogeneous part of Nn. The Ehrhart polynomial of Pn is E(t) = Nn(tx1; : : : ; txn), and Vn is its top degree coefficient. We will give 3 totally different formulas for these polynomials. Let us first mention the special case (x1; : : : ; xn+1) = (n+1; : : : ; 1). The polytope Pn(n + 1; n; : : : ; 1) = ConvexHull((w(1); :::; w(n + 1)) j w 2 Sn+1) is the most symmetric permutohedron. It is invariant under the action of the symmetric group Sn+1. For example, for n = 2, it is the regular hexagon: regular hexagon subdivided into 3 rhombi The polytope Pn(n + 1; : : : ; 1) is a zonotope, i.e., Minkowsky sum of line intervals. It is well known that n 1 • Vn(n + 1; : : : ; 1) = (n + 1) − is the number of trees on n + 1 labelled vertices. Indeed, Pn(n + 1; : : : ; 1) can be subdivided into parallelepipeds of unit volume associated with trees. This follows from a general result about zonotopes. • Nn(n + 1; : : : ; 1) is the number of forests on n + 1 labelled vertices. In general, for arbitrary x1; : : : ; xn+1, the permutohedron Pn(x1; : : : ; xn+1) is not a zonotope. We cannot easily calculate its volume by subdividing it into par- allelepipeds. PERMUTOHEDRA, ASSOCIAHEDRA, AND BEYOND 3 2. First Formula Theorem 2.1. Fix any distinct numbers λ1; : : : ; λn+1 such that λ1 +· · ·+λn+1 = 0. We have n 1 (λw(1)x1 + · · · + λw(n+1)xn+1) Vn(x1; : : : ; xn+1) = n! (λw(1) − λw(2))(λw(2) − λw(3)) · · · (λw(n) − λw(n+1)): w Sn 2X+1 Notice that all λi's in the right-hand side are canceled after the symmetrization. More generally, let W be the Weyl group associated with a rank n root system, and let α1; : : : ; αn be a choice of simple roots. Theorem 2.2. Let λ be any regular weight. The volume of the weight polytope is f (λ, x)n Vol PW (x) = ; jW j (λ, w(α )) · · · (λ, w(αn)) w W 1 X2 where the volume is normalized so that the volume of the parallelepiped generated by the simple roots αi is 1, and f is the index of the root lattice in the weight lattice. Idea of Proof. Let us use Khovansky-Pukhlikov's method [PK]. Instead of counting the number of lattice points in P , calculate the sum Σ[P ] of formal exponents ea over lattice points a 2 P \ Zn. We can work with unbounded polytopes. For example, for a simplicial cone C, the sum Σ[C] is given by a simple rational expression. Any polytope P can be explicitly presented as an alternating sum of simplicial cones Σ[P ] = Σ[C1] Σ[C2] · · · over vertices of P . Applying this method to the weight polytope, we obtain the following claim. Theorem 2.3. For a dominant weight µ, the sum of exponents over lattice points of the weight polytope PW (µ) equals w(µ) a e Σ[PW (µ)] := e = ; w(α ) w(αn) (1 − e− 1 ) · · · (1 − e− ) a PW (µ) (L+µ) w W 2 X\ X2 where L be the root lattice. Compare this claim with Weyl's character formula! If we replace the product over simple roots αi in the right-hand side of Theorem 2.3 by a similar product over all positive roots, we obtain exactly Weyl's character formula. Theorem 2.2 and its special case Theorem 2.1 and be deduced from Theorem 2.3 in the same way as Weyl's dimension formula can be deduced from Weyl's character formula. Remark 2.4. The sum of exponents Σ[PW (µ)] over lattice points of the weight polytope is obtained from the character ch Vµ of the irreducible representation Vµ of the associated Lie group by replacing all nonzero coefficients in ch Vµ with 1. For example, in type A, ch Vµ is the Schur polynomial sµ and Σ[Pn(µ)] is obtained from the Schur polynomial sµ by erasing the coefficients of all monomials. 4 ALEXANDER POSTNIKOV 3. Second Formula Let us use the coordinates y1; : : : ; yn+1 related x1; : : : ; xn+1 by y1 = −x1 y = −x + x 8 2 2 1 y = −x + 2x − x > 3 3 2 1 > · · · < n n n yn+1 = − 0 xn + 1 xn 1 − · · · n x1 > − Write V = Vol>P (x ; : : : ; x ) as a polynomial in the variables y ; : : : ; y . n :> n 1 n+1 1 n+1 Theorem 3.1. We have 1 Vn = y S · · · y Sn ; n! j 1j j j (S1X;:::;Sn) where the sum is over ordered collections of subsets S1; : : : ; Sn ⊂ [n + 1] such that, for any distinct i1; : : : ; ik, we have jSi1 [ · · · [ Sik j ≥ k + 1. This theorem implies that n! Vn is a polynomial in y2; : : : ; yn+1 with positive integer coefficients. For example, V1 = Vol ([(x1; x2); (x2; x1)]) = x1 − x2 = y2 and 2 2 2V2 = 6 y2 + 6 y2 y3 + y3. Remark 3.2. The condition on subsets S1; : : : ; Sn in Theorem 3.1 is very similar to the condition in Hall's marriage theorem. One just needs to replace the inequality ≥ k + 1 with ≥ k to obtain Hall's marriage condition. It is not hard to prove the following analog of Hall's theorem. Dragon marriage problem: There are n + 1 brides and n grooms living in a medieval village. A dragon comes to the village and takes one of the brides. We are given a collection G of pairs of brides and grooms that can marry each other. Find the condition on G that ensures that, no matter which bride the dragon takes, it will be possible to match the remaining brides and grooms. Proposition 3.3. (Dragon marriage theorem) Let S1; : : : ; Sn ⊂ [n + 1]. The fol- lowing three conditions are equivalent: (1) For any distinct i1; : : : ; ik, we have jSi1 [ · · · [ Sik j ≥ k + 1. (2) For any j 2 [n+1], there is a system of distinct representatives in S1; : : : ; Sn that avoids j. (This is a reformulation of the dragon marriage problem.) (3) One can remove some elements from Si's to get the edge set of a spanning tree in Kn+1. Theorem 3.1 can be extended to a larger class of polytopes discussed below. 4. Generalized permutohedra Let ∆[n+1] = ConvexHull(e1; : : : ; en+1) be the standard coordinate simplex in n+1 R . For a subset I ⊂ [n + 1], let ∆I = ConvexHull(ei j i 2 I) denotes the face of the coordinate simplex ∆[n+1]. Let Y = fYI g be a collection of parameters YI ≥ 0 for all nonempty subsets I ⊂ [n + 1].

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us