Potential Fields: Context

Potential Fields: Context

Potential fields: context As of 2002, fifty percent of the world’s seismic fleet was recording gravity and/or magnetic data; a rapid surge took place (this figure was double that of 2000). Some reasons: In the exploration industry: • Cost effective — compared to seismics • Complementary to seismic data in e.g. sub-salt or sub-basalt, where it is difficult to image • New technology/interpretation techniques (e.g. GPS, gradiometers) has brought about an improvement in accuracy (position and signal) In planetary physics • New LEO-satellites can deliver unprecedented accuracy for under- standing planetary mass distributions, ocean flow, rebound after deglacia- tion, even mass redistribution due to global warming! • Gravity and magnetic missions provide unique information on our sis- ter planets Energy, Work and Potential F Figure 1: Force field F Work done by field in moving particle δx is F · δx: δW = Fxdx + Fydy + Fzdz (1) Total work, W , in moving from x0 to x1 is x1 W = F · dx (2) Zx0 1 In general the work done depends on the path chosen. Also in general the work done in traversing a circuit is non-zero, we write this as W = F · dx 6= 0. There areH force fields for which the work done is independent of the path. These are called conservative force fields, and for these F · dx = 0. H Example of a non-conservative field y B B at (1,1) 1 A x Figure 2: Path 1 Let F = x2y2i + xyj Calculate work done in moving A to B along path 1. 1 1 W = Fxdx + Fydy (3) Z0 Z0 1 1 = 0+1 ydy = (4) Z0 2 Now calculate the work done in using different path 2. y 2 B B at (1,1) A x Figure 3: Path 2 2 1 1 W = Fydy + Fxdx (5) Z0 Z0 1 2 1 = 0+1 x dx = (6) Z0 3 The work done is different — hence the force is non-conservative. It also follows that the work done in going round circuit by paths 1 and 1 1 1 2, with path 2 traversed in the negative sense, = 2 − 3 = 6 . In the other 1 direction the work = − 6 . Example of a conservative field Let F = yi + xj For our previous paths we now find: W1 = 1 (7) W2 = 1 (8) and the work is independent of the path in general. One can show that for the work to be independent of the path, there must exist a function such that the force F = ∇φ Depending on the convention used φ can be either plus or minus the work function. Then F =+∇W . We’ll see how this fits with gravity fields in a moment. If F =+∇W , then ∇∧ F = 0 (vector identity). Now consider the surface integral ∇∧ F · dS. We know this is zero, but: R ∇∧ F · dS = F · dl = 0 (9) Z I by Stokes’s theorem. If the integral of the work done around a closed path is zero, then F has zero curl, and is said to be irrotational. Figure 4: Conditions associated with potentials 3 Equipotential surfaces An equipotential surface is one on which the potential remains constant: φ(x,y,z)= const If ˆs is a unit vector lying tangent to an equipotential surface of F, then ∂φ ˆs · F = ∂s and must vanish. Therefore field lines are always perpendicular to their equipotential surface. No work is done in moving a particle along an equipo- tential. The distance between equipotential surfaces is a measure of the density of field lines. Thus the force field F has the greatest intensity in regions where equipotential surfaces are closest. Examples of potentials Gravity field Newton proposed the law of gravitation in 1687: Gm1m2 |F| = r2 where m1 and m2 are two masses separated by a distance of r. m r^ r ^ r is directed from the source to the test mass Figure 5: Definitions of m, r and ˆr The force of one particle is directed towards the other particle; G is a constant of proportionality, the gravitational constant −11 3 −1 −2 G = 6.67 × 10 m kg s Let m1 be a test particle of unit mass. Then the force on it due to m2 = m is: −Gm F = ˆr (10) r2 where ˆr is a unit vector directed from the source mass to the test mass. 4 Epot r Figure 6: Potential variation with r Take unit mass from infinity to r, then the work done by the field is: work done by field = + F · dr (11) Z r Gm = − 2 dr (12) Z∞ r Gm = (13) r = U (14) This is the negative of the particle’s potential energy. So Gm E (r)= − pot r where Epot is the potential energy. We have chosen the constant of integration so that the particle has zero P.E. at ∞. Now the g field is given by: −Gm g =+∇U = ˆr (15) r2 where m is the mass causing g and ˆr is the vector from m to the observation point. NB The literature is confusing. The sign convention is arbitrary. We follow Blakely. He uses γ for G. Telford et al, amongst others, chose g = −∇U. Other conservative potentials Any central force F = f(r)ˆr can be represented as the gradient of a potential. 5 One example arising in geophysics is the centrifugal potential, for which: 2 F = rω ˆr (16) It has a potential φ = 1/2ω2r2 Units In S.I. g has units ms−2 (it is an acceleration). An old system used 1 Gal = 1 cms−2 = 10−2ms−2. 1 mGal is ≈ 10−6 the acceleration of gravity at the Earth’s surface. Beware: gravity unit (g.u.) is also used, 1 g.u. = 0.1 mGal. 6.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us