Molecular Mechanisms of the Preventable Causes of Cancer in the United States

Molecular Mechanisms of the Preventable Causes of Cancer in the United States

Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW Molecular mechanisms of the preventable causes of cancer in the United States Erica A. Golemis,1 Paul Scheet,2 Tim N. Beck,1,3 Ed Scolnick,4 David J. Hunter,5 Ernest Hawk,6 and Nancy Hopkins7 1Program in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA; 2Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA; 3Molecular and Cell Biology and Genetics Program, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19129, USA; 4Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA; 5Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Medical Sciences Division, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom; 6Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas 77030, USA; 7Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Biology Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA Annually, there are 1.6 million new cases of cancer and cause skin cancer, only a small fraction of the public is nearly 600,000 cancer deaths in the United States alone. aware that smoking increases the incidence of cancer in The public health burden associated with these numbers more than a dozen sites or that viruses cause essentially has motivated enormous research efforts into understand- all cervical cancers, all head and neck cancers (HNCs) ing the root causes of cancer. These efforts have led to the not caused by smoking, and most liver cancers not caused recognition that between 40% and 45% of cancers are as- by obesity or hepatotoxins (such as chronic alcohol use). sociated with preventable risk factors and, importantly, While the long latency between cancer-initiating insult have identified specific molecular mechanisms by which and diagnosable disease means that measurable decreases these exposures modify human physiology to induce or in cancer incidence would take some time to manifest promote cancer. The increasingly refined knowledge of (e.g., see Pirie et al. 2013), nevertheless, over the next these mechanisms, which we summarize here, emphasiz- two decades, a highly significant reduction of mortality es the need for greater efforts toward primary cancer pre- could be observed with widespread adoption of prevention vention through mitigation of modifiable risk factors. It strategies. also suggests exploitable avenues for improved secondary One purpose of writing this review for basic scientists is prevention (which includes the development of therapeu- to draw greater attention to the field of cancer prevention tics designed for cancer interception and enhanced tech- by noting the impact of prevention on cancer outcomes at niques for noninvasive screening and early detection) the individual and population levels to date as well as its based on detailed knowledge of early neoplastic pathobiol- potential for the future. Our hope is that a concise but de- ogy. Such efforts would complement the current empha- tailed summary of current knowledge of the mechanisms sis on the development of therapeutic approaches to of action of known carcinogens and preventable causes of treat established cancers and are likely to result in far cancer may stimulate further research, leading to the greater gains in reducing morbidity and mortality. identification of additional preventable causes of cancer and also identification of mechanism-based interventions to prevent carcinogens from causing cancer. We view such Prevention and early detection, along with continual a review as timely, as spectacular advances in understand- improvements in cancer treatment, have contributed ing the genetic and cellular basis of cancer have shed light substantially to declining U.S. cancer death rates. Less on these issues and could lead to promising new research widely known is that proven methods of prevention and directions in prevention and early detection. There is a early detection could further reduce the incidence of adult need for more basic scientists to work in this area, and cancers in the U.S. by at least a third to a half and reduce we hope that this review will motivate such efforts. cancer deaths by ≥50%. Furthermore, while it is widely Typically, the development of cancer in adults is the known that smoking causes lung cancer and that sunlight result of multiple mutations in many genes involved in controlling the growth of cells and altered metabolic changes in tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment [Keywords: cancer mechanisms; cancer prevention; early detection] that facilitate or accelerate the ultimate growth of the Corresponding authors: [email protected], [email protected] Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.314849.118. Free- © 2018 Golemis et al. This article, published in Genes & Development,is ly available online through the Genes & Development Open Access available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 Internation- option. al), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. GENES & DEVELOPMENT 32:1–35 Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 0890-9369/18; www.genesdev.org 1 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Golemis et al. cancer (Hanahan and Weinberg 2011; Pickup et al. 2014). motes cancer through systemic changes associated with Examples of these principles are shown by examining the the aging process (Campisi 2013; Aunan et al. 2017; Palm- incidence of human cancers, many of which increase dra- er et al. 2018). matically with age. For instance, the incidence of cancer With the current knowledge, prevention becomes more of the large intestine increases by a factor of ∼1000 effective if one can identify the extrinsic causes of cancer between the ages 30 and 80 (Cairns 1978). How can we ex- and remove them or understand and either retard or block plain this? Very early studies of carcinogenesis in animals intrinsic causes of cancer. Early detection when cancers began to yield insights into understanding the biology be- are minimally symptomatic (or screening, which relates hind this observation. The studies showed a long lag be- to the even earlier detection of presymptomatic cancers tween the application of a carcinogen (a chemical that or cancer precursors) can work for some types of cancer causes cancer, commonly by introducing a change in because of the long time frame over which many cancers DNA) and the actual detection of the cancer (Yamagiwa develop and the fact that at least some cancers remain suf- and Ichikawa 1918). These studies also demonstrated a ficiently contained so that, when first detected, they can second crucial principle: the cooperativity of such “initia- be completely excised (Alam and Ratner 2001). Another tor” agents that mutate DNA and “promoter” agents that approach—called “interception”—proposes to use knowl- act after the mutational event, often to stimulate the edge of the events that give rise to cancers to treat the dis- growth of initiated cells (Filler et al. 2007). ease at earlier stages, including even before a cancer can be Such observations led to the proposal in the 1950s that detected (Blackburn 2011). cancer is the end result of a series of events within a single We begin this review with a discussion of “primary pre- cell (Fisher and Hollomon 1951; Nording 1953; Armitage vention,”which wereferto simplyas “prevention.” Prima- and Doll 1954; Fisher 1958). Mathematical modeling ry prevention meanspreventingpeople from getting cancer suggested that as many as six events might be needed to in the first place by eliminating or reducing carcinogenic produce many human adult cancers, such as colon cancer exposures; for example, by smoking cessation or vaccina- (Armitage and Doll 1957; for discussion, see Cairns 1978). tion. We review the environmental and behavioral carcin- Today, decades of research in animal models and humans ogens currently known to be responsible for a large fraction support the multistep model of carcinogenesis and reveal of U.S. cancer deaths, their mechanisms of action, and suc- many of the changes and processes involved (Hanahan cesses to date in eliminating exposure to these agents. We and Weinberg 2011). Changes in specific genes—i.e., then review prospects for preventing cancer by drugs or oncogenes (which drive the growth of cells) or tumor other mechanism-based interventions. We examine the suppressor genes (which retard the abnormal growth of importance of identifying high-risk individuals who can cells)—are followed by stimulated growth to expand the most benefit from prevention or early detection. We then population of initiated cells. As this expansion occurs, briefly turn to early detection itself and discuss the signifi- the potential for additional events within an initiated cant problems associated with population screening. We cell increases until that cell acquires the ability to escape review successful screening methods in use in the U.S. growth controls, avoid the normal mechanisms of pro- and mechanistic reasons for their success. We conclude grammed cell death, escape immune surveillance, remodel with the prospect for novel screening methods based on ad- a microenvironment in which to thrive, and metastasize. vances in the genetics and molecular biology of cancer. In The changes in oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes may the final section, we consider how much cancer is biologi- be changes affecting their DNA sequence or epigenetic cally intrinsic versus how much is caused by exposure to changes that control the expression of these genes. environmental, occupational, and behavioral carcinogens For most human cancers, it is not possible to practically and the role of aging in cancer and the possibility of pre- infer how many independent events are needed to produce venting or delaying cancer by delaying aging itself. all of the changes that result in cancer.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    36 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us