Transit IDEA Program Light Rail Transit / Street Grade Crossing Safety System Final Report for Transit IDEA Project 68 Prepared by: Carl E. Conti, SIL4 Systems, Inc. January, 2014 Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) Programs Managed by the Transportation Research Board This IDEA project was funded by the Transit IDEA Program. The TRB currently manages the following three IDEA programs: • The NCHRP IDEA Program, which focuses on advances in the design, construction, and maintenance of highway systems, is funded by American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) as part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). • The Safety IDEA Program currently focuses on innovative approaches for improving railroad safety or performance. The program is currently funded by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). The program was previously jointly funded by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and the FRA. • The Transit IDEA Program, which supports development and testing of innovative concepts and methods for advancing transit practice, is funded by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) as part of the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP). Management of the three IDEA programs is coordinated to promote the development and testing of innovative concepts, methods, and technologies. For information on the IDEA programs, check the IDEA website (www.trb.org/idea). For questions, contact the IDEA programs office by telephone at (202) 334-3310. IDEA Programs Transportation Research Board 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 The project that is the subject of this contractor-authored report was a part of the Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) Programs, which are managed by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) with the approval of the Governing Board of the National Research Council. The members of the oversight committee that monitored the project and reviewed the report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance. The views expressed in this report are those of the contractor who conducted the investigation documented in this report and do not necessarily reflect those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, or the sponsors of the IDEA Programs. This document has not been edited by TRB. The Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, the National Research Council, and the organizations that sponsor the IDEA Programs do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of the investigation. Light Rail Transit / Street Grade Crossing Safety System Final Report Transit IDEA Project 68 Prepared for Transit IDEA Program Transportation Research Board National Research Council Prepared by Carl E. Conti SIL4 Systems, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA January 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following are the names and addresses of the participants of the Expert Review Panel for this project. The Regional Expert Review Panel consists of a select group of experts, comprised of technical specialists, within the Light Rail Transit Safety community. They will provide both technical product guidance, and facilitate transfer of IDEA results to practice. A list of members is presented here: Robert Huych Pam McCombe Safety Department Safety Engineering Consultant Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth. Parsons Brinckerhoff 1240 West 6th Street 100 E. Pine St. Cleveland, OH, 44113-1331 Orlando, FL 32801 Carol A. Doering Walter Heinrich Safety Outreach Specialist Rail Safety Manager SOUND TRANSIT Metropolitan Transit Auth. – Harris County 401 S. Jackson Street 1900 Main St. Seattle, WA 98104 P.O. Box 61429 Houston, TX 77208-1429 Govind R. Sulibhavi Project Manager - MTA Edward Kramer Suite 602 Safety Auditor 6 St. Paul Street Metro Transit - St. Louis Baltimore, MD 21213 707 North First Street St. Louis, MO 63102 Included in the panel are Safety specialists from four (4) Transit Authorities as well as a person experienced public outreach/information programs and processes as this may be a key element in an overall “increased Hazard/Safety Awareness” program. This panel reviewed the previous Stage Reports and their input has been included in this report. This document is the Final Report documenting the results of this project. It includes the results of all stages of this project. This report is being sent to the Panel for review and comment/feedback. We held a teleconference with the Expert Panel and the feedback/recommendations gleaned from this teleconference as well as electronic commentary are incorporated in this Final Report in the pertinent sections. Transit IDEA PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIR CHAIR IDEA PROGRAMS STAFF FRED GILLIAM STEPHEN R. GODWIN, Director for Studies and Special Programs Gilliam and Associates JON M. WILLIAMS, Program Director, IDEA and Synthesis Studies DEMISHA WILLIAMS, Senior Program Assistant MEMBERS GREGORY COOK Veolia Transportation EXPERT REVIEW PANEL JOHN FAYOS ROBERT HUYCH, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth. Critical Link CAROL DOERING, Sound Transit PAUL E. JAMIESON, P.E. GOVIND SULIBHAVI, MTA Wabtec Passenger Transit PAM MCCOMBE, Parsons Brinckerhoff ANTHONY M. KOUNESKI WALTER HEINRICH, Metropolitan Transit Auth. – Harris County AMK& Associates EDWARD KRAMER, Metro Transit - St. Louis FRANK LONYAI L.A. County Metropolitan Transportation Authority PAMELA MCCOMBE Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority PAUL MESSINA Port Authority Trans-Hudson KATHERINE F.TURNBULL Texas A&M University JOHN P. WALSH Clever Devices, Ltd. FTA LIAISON ROY WEI SHUN CHEN Federal Transit Administration HENY A. NEJAKO Federal Transit Administration APTA Liaison LOUIS F. SAnders American Public Transportation Association DHS Liaison BRUCE LOURYK Department of Homeland Security TRB LIAISON JAMES BRYANT, JR. Transportation Research Board TRB TCRP Staff STEPHAN A. PARKER, Senior Program Officer Transit Cooperative Research Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pg. Cover Page ......................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements – Expert Review Panel ...................................................................... ii Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. iii 0 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 4 1 Stage 1 Results ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1 SURVEY.................................................................................................................. 5 1.1.1 LRV and Cars Running Parallel ................................................................. 9 1.1.2 Cars and LRV at Perpendicular Intersections ............................................. 10 1.1.3 Pedestrian Safety ........................................................................................ 12 2 Stage 2 Results ............................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Component Procurement and System Build ............................................................ 14 2.2 Component Selection and Procurement ................................................................... 14 2.2.1 Carborne Components and System Build .................................................. 15 2.2.2 Highway-Rail Crossing (HRC) Components ............................................. 17 2.3 Task 6: Software Development ............................................................................... 19 2.3.1 Vehicle Monitoring Platform (VMP) Software ......................................... 19 2.3.2 On-Board Comms Module (VCP) Software .............................................. 19 2.3.3 Digital Video recorder (DVR) Software ................................................... 19 2.3.4 Human Machine Interface (HMI) Software ............................................... 19 2.3.5 Vehicle Simulator Software ........................................................................ 19 2.4 Task 7: Field Trial Prep II ...................................................................................... 20 2.5 Task 8: Test Planning ............................................................................................. 20 2.6 Task 9: Component and System testing, Data Collection and Analysis ................. 23 2.6.1 Static Testing – Communications and Streaming Video ...................... 23 2.6.2 Antenna Static Range Testing (Streaming Video) ................................ 25 2.6.3 Static Testing Summary ........................................................................ 26 2.6.4 Dynamic Testing – Communications and Streaming Video ................. 27 2.6.5 Dynamic Testing Summary .................................................................. 30 2.7 Conclusions of Stage 2 .......................................................................................... 30 3 Stage 3 Results ............................................................................................................ 34 3.1 Task 10: Pre-Trail Test Plan .................................................................................... 34 3.2 Task 11: Field Trial Preparation — Stage 3 ...........................................................