Positions of 10 Central and Eastern European Countries on Eu Institutional Reforms

Positions of 10 Central and Eastern European Countries on Eu Institutional Reforms

POSITIONS OF 10 CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES ON EU INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS: ANALYTICAL SURVEY in the framework of the CEEC-DEBATE project The debate on the finalité politique of the European Union in the applicant countries from Central and Eastern Europe – measures accompanying other EU activities to prepare the IGC 2004 Funded by the European Commission under the Fifth Framework Programme Edited by Christian Franck and Dorota Pyszna-Nigge Authors: · Mirela Apostol, Synergy, Bucharest, Romania · Vladimir Bilcik, Slovak Foreign Policy Association (SFPA), Slovakia · Irena Brinar, IIR University of Ljubljana, Slovenia · Ainars Dimants, European Movement Latvia · Piret Ehin, EuroCollege, University of Tartu, Estonia · Dovile Jakniunaite, Institute of International Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University, Lithuania · Petr Krotohvil, Institute of International Relations, Prague, The Czech Republic · Krassimir Nikolov, University of Sofia, Bulgaria · Rafal Trzaskowski, European Institute Lodz/European Centre Natolin, Poland · Viljar Veebel, EuroCollege, University of Tartu, Estonia · Krisztina Vida, IWE Budapest, Hungary Louvain-la-Neuve/Brussels June 2003 Table of content: Introduction.......................................................................................................................4 Questionnaire .....................................................................................................................6 National Report Bulgaria..................................................................................................8 1. Results of work of the European Convention ....................................................................8 2. Institutions ...................................................................................................................10 3. Decision-making ..........................................................................................................22 4. Awareness of the European Convention.........................................................................24 National Report Czech Republic....................................................................................27 1. Results of work of the Convention .................................................................................28 2. Institutions ...................................................................................................................29 2.1. Non-paper on the reform of the EU institutions ........................................................30 2.2. The IIR research project “Debate about the Future of Europe and ÈR”......................31 2.3. “Europeum Paper”.................................................................................................32 3. Decision-making ..........................................................................................................33 4. Czech debate and its priorities: role of national parliaments, CFSP and EMU...................35 5. Awareness of the European Convention.........................................................................36 National Report Estonia..................................................................................................39 1. Results of work of the European Convention ..................................................................39 2. Institutions ...................................................................................................................41 3. Decision-making ..........................................................................................................44 4. Priorities of the Estonian debate ....................................................................................45 5. Awareness of the European Convention.........................................................................48 National Report Hungary ...............................................................................................50 1. Results of work of the European Convention ..................................................................50 2. Reform of Institutions ...................................................................................................51 3. Decision-making ..........................................................................................................52 4. Hungarian priorities: CFSP, rights of minorities, EU external borders..............................53 5. Awareness of the European Convention.........................................................................54 National Report Lithuania..............................................................................................56 1. Results of work of the European Convention ..................................................................56 2. Institutions ...................................................................................................................57 3. Decision-making ..........................................................................................................59 4. Lithuanian debate: CFSP, neighbourhood policy and withdrawal from the EU..................59 5. Awareness of the European Convention.........................................................................60 National Report Latvia ...................................................................................................63 1. Results of work of the European Convention............................................................63 2. Institutions .................................................................................................................64 3. Decision-making........................................................................................................67 4. Priorities of the debate in Latvia ...............................................................................69 5. Awareness of the European Convention...................................................................69 National Report Poland ..................................................................................................70 1. Results of work of the European Convention ..................................................................70 2. Reform of EU Institutions .............................................................................................71 2 3. Decision-making ..........................................................................................................75 4. Poland’s specific interests .............................................................................................77 4.1. Strengthening of the Common Foreign and Security Policy/European Security and Defence Polic y.............................................................................................................77 4.2. Relationship between smaller and bigger countries ..................................................79 4.3. Division of competencies .......................................................................................79 4.4. Other particularities - a reference to God in the EU Constitutional Treaty..................80 5. Awareness of the European Convention.........................................................................80 National Report Romania...............................................................................................82 1. Results of work of the European Convention ..................................................................82 2. Institutions ...................................................................................................................85 3. Decision-making ..........................................................................................................89 4. Debate in Romania and its priorities ..............................................................................91 5. Awareness of the European Convention.........................................................................91 National Report Slovakia................................................................................................93 1. Results of work of the Convention on the Future of Europe .............................................93 2. Institutions ...................................................................................................................93 3. Decision-making ..........................................................................................................94 4. Other issues: the mode and contents of domestic debate..................................................95 5. Awareness of the Convention on the Future of Europe ....................................................97 National Report Slovenia................................................................................................98 1. Results of work of the European Convention............................................................98 2. Institutions ...................................................................................................................99 3. Decision-making......................................................................................................102 4. Priorities of the Slovenian debate............................................................................103 5. Awareness of the European Convention.................................................................104 Representatives of the CEECs in the Convention......................................................109 The report can be downloaded from the following

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    111 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us