Lattice Nonlinear Schrödinger

Lattice Nonlinear Schrödinger

Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odinger: history and open problems Kun Hao and Vladimir Korepin Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies January 20, 2021 V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 1 / 30 Continuous model The model has many names: Lieb-Liniger, Bose gas with delta interaction, Tonks-Girardeau, nonlinear Sch¨odinger.It has application in quantum optics. It was build in optical lattice by N. J. van Druten https://arxiv.org/pdf/0709.1899.pdf The Hamiltonian is: Z y y y H = dx(@x @x + κψ ); (x); y(y) = iδ(x y) f g − It is integrable both in classical and quantum cases. It has infinitely many conservation laws and Lax representation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lax_pair. @t Ln = Mn+1(λ)Ln(λ) − Ln(λ)Mn(λ) An integer n is a discrete space variable x = n∆ and ∆ is lattice spacing. V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 2 / 30 R matrix We shall discuss the quantum case. Lax representation follows from Yang-Baxter equation. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0910.0295.pdf O O R(λ, µ) Ln(λ) Ln(µ) = Ln(µ) Ln(λ) R(λ, µ) The R(λ, µ) solves the Yang-Baxter equation : C.N. Yang Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, (1967) 1312-1314 https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1312 Yang found the following solution: R(λ, µ) = i1 + (µ − λ)Π This is the same R matrix, which describes spin 1=2 XXX Heisenberg chain. Here Π is permutation. C.N. Yang Phys. Rev. 168, (1968) 1920 https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.168.1920 Note Note that for λ − µ = i the R(λ, µ) = i (1 − Π) is degenerate. It is 1D projector. V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 3 / 30 QISM formulation The model was embedded into quantum inverse scattering method https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_inverse_scattering_method. We shall use algebraic Bethe Ansatz https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9605187 The orthogonality and completeness of the Bethe Ansatz eigenstates was proved by Teunis C. Dorlas in 1993. An approximate L operator on a dense lattice was discovered by Faddeev , Sklyanin and Takhtajan in 1979 iλ∆ y 1 2 ipκχn 2 Ln(λ) = − − iλ∆ + O(∆ ); ipκχn 1 + 2 An integer n is a discrete space variable x = n∆ and ∆ is lattice spacing. The χn is the quantum field: y [χn; χm] = ∆ δnm χ = ∆ in the limit ∆ 0. The λ is the spectral parameter! and κ is a coupling constant. V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 4 / 30 Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation Exact lattice Lax operator (all orders in ∆) was constructed by A.G. Izergin and V. E. Korepin in Doklady Akademii Nauk, 1981 https://arxiv.org/pdf/0910.0295.pdf see also Nuclear Physics B 205 [FS5], 401, 1982 iλ∆ κ y y ! 1 2 + 2 χj χj ipκχj %j Lj (λ) = − −iλ∆ κ y : ipκ%j χj 1 + 2 + 2 χj χj y κ y 1 [χ ; χ ] = ∆δ and % = (1 + χ χ ) 2 ; j l j;l j 4 j j here κ > 0, and ∆ > 0. The same R matrix. V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 5 / 30 Equivalence of NLS and XXX chain with negative spin We can rewrite the L operator as XXX Heisenberg chain Zeitschrift f¨urPhysik 49, (1928) 619-636 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01328601: XXX z k k Lj = −σ Lj = iλ + Sj ⊗ σ + y − z κ y Sj = ipκχ %j ; Sj = ipκ%j χj ; Sj = (1 + χ χj ): − j 2 j representation of SU(2) algebra with negative spin s = 2 . − κ∆ The σ are Pauli matrices. V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 6 / 30 Antipode and quantum determinant The monodromy matrix and transfer matrix: A(λ) B(λ) T0(λ) L0L(λ) ::: L01(λ) = ; τ(λ) = tr0 T0(λ): ≡ C(λ) D(λ) N N R(λ, µ)(T0(λ) T0(µ)) = (T0(µ) T0(λ)) R(λ, µ) The antipode of quantum monodromy matrix is: −1 −L y t y T (λ) = dq (λ)σ T (λ + i)σ 2 dq(λ) = ∆ (λ ν)(λ ν + i)=4 ν = 2i=∆ − − − This is similar to Cramer's formula http://pi.math.cornell.edu/~andreim/Lec17.pdf The difference is a shift of the spectral parameter by i. The denominator is the quantum determinant: L detqT (λ) = A(λ)D(λ + i) B(λ)C(λ + i) = dq (λ) This was discovered in 1981− in https://arxiv.org/pdf/0910.0295.pdf Remark When λ − µ = i the R matrix turns into one dimensional projector. V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 7 / 30 XXX chain with spin s = 1 − PL The Hamiltonian is: = k=1 Hk;k+1 The density of the HamiltonianH is Hk;k+1 = ( Jk;k+1) (Jk;k+1 + 1) + (2): − − − Here (x) = d ln Γ(x)=dx and ~ ~ Jk;k+1(Jk;k+1 + 1) = 2Sk Sk+1 ⊗ Can be solved by Vieta's formulas. QCD describes deep inelastic scattering. The scattering of a lepton on a baryon is a sum of Feynman diagrams. In leading logarithmic approximation ladder diagrams dominate. Quarks exchange gluons. The Hamiltonian describing interactions of the gluons is this spin chain. L. Lipatov https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9311037.pdf L. Alvarez-Gaume, https://arxiv.org/pdf/0804.1464.pdf Our paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.00800.pdf This is a part of larger trend: spin chains are related to 4D Yang-Mills N. A. Nekrasov, S. L. Shatashvili https://arxiv.org/pdf/0908.4052.pdf V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 8 / 30 Bethe equations An example is XXX chain with spin s = 1. The Bethe equations are https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethe_ansatz− : L N L N λk + is Y λk λj + i s=−1 λk i Y λk λj + i = − − = − λ is λ λ i λ + i λ λ i k j=1 k j −−−! k j=1 k j − j6=k − − j6=k − − k = 1; ; N ··· These are periodic boundary conditions. The energy is: N N X 1 d λj + i X 2 E ln = 2− ; ≡ i dλj λj i λ + 1 j=1 − j=1 j V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 9 / 30 Analysis of Bethe equations Theorem 1. All solutions of Bethe equations for s = −1 are real numbers. L N λk − i Y λk − λj + i = ; k = 1; ··· ; N: λk + i λk − λj − i j=1; j6=k Proof: Let us use the following properties: λ − i λ − i LHS: ≤ 1; when Imλ ≥ 0; ≥ 1; when Imλ ≤ 0; λ + i λ + i λ + i λ + i RHS: ≥ 1; when Imλ ≥ 0; ≤ 1; when Imλ ≤ 0; λ − i λ − i If we denote the one with maximal imaginary part as λmax 2 fλj g, then Im λmax ≥ Im λj ; j = 1; ··· ; N: For λk = λmax L N λmax − i Y λmax − λj + i = ≥ 1: λmax + i λmax − λj − i j=1 Due to LHS, this results in: Im λj ≤ Im λmax ≤ 0 Similarly, one has 0 ≤ Im λmin ≤ Im λj ! so Im λj = 0 V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 10 / 30 Solution exists and unique The logarithm of Bethe equations for the model s = 1, − N X 2πnk = θ(λk λj ) + L θ (λk ) ; − j=1 Here nk are different integer (or half integer) numbers: Pauli principle http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~korepin/PDF_files/Pauli.pdf iκ + λ θ(λ) = θ( λ) = i ln ; π < θ(λ) < π; Im λ = 0 − − iκ λ − − 2κ θ0(λ µ) = K(λ, µ) = ; K(λ) = K(λ, 0): − κ2 + (λ µ)2 − V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 11 / 30 Yang's action is convex Theorem 2. The solutions of the logarithmic form Bethe equations exist. Logarithmic Bethe equations are the extremums of the Yang action: N N N X 1 X X S = L θ (λ ) + θ (λ − λ ) − 2π n λ ; 1 k 2 1 k j k k k=1 k;j k=1 R λ θ1(λ) = 0 θ(µ)dµ. Bethe equations: @S=@λj = 0. N @2S X = δjl [LK(λj ) + K(λj ; λm)] − K(λj ; λl ) @λj @λl m=1 Consider some real vector vj . The quadratic form is positive: 2 N N X @ S X 2 X 2 vj vl = LK(λj )vj + K(λj ; λl )(vj − vl ) ≥ 0 @λj @λl j;l j=1 j>l The K(λj ) are positive. The action is convex: it has unique minimum. Solution of Bethe equation exists and unique. V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 12 / 30 Side remark The same second derivative appears later in the theory. The square of the norm of the Bethe wave function is a determinant: @2S ΦN ΦN = det N h j i @λj @λl M. Gaudin conjectured in 1972. V.E. Korepin proved in 1982 http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~korepin/PDF_files/norm.PDF N @2S X = δjl [LK(λj ) + K(λj ; λm)] K(λj ; λl ) @λ @λ − j l m=1 V. E. Korepin (YITP) Lattice nonlinear Schr¨odingerequation January 20, 2021 13 / 30 Open problem: Is to analyze the integral equation in the limit of κ 0 The K(λ, µ) 2πδ(λ µ): the integral cancel the! LHS ...? ! − The thermodynamic limit at zero temperature For positive κ all λj has to be different: Pauli principle in the momentum space is valid.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    38 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us