Notes on LU an LU Factorization of an M × N Matrix Is Its Expression in The

Notes on LU an LU Factorization of an M × N Matrix Is Its Expression in The

Linear Algebra Grinshpan Notes on LU An LU factorization of an m × n matrix is its expression in the form of a product of an m × m unit lower triangular matrix L and an m × n upper triangular matrix U: 1 2 1 0 1 2 EXAMPLE = 3 5 3¯ 1 0 −1 ¯ If A = LU; then U is a row echelon form of A obtained through the succession of elementary row operations [ row i of A ] − Lij [ row j of A ]; i = j + 1; : : : ; m; for each j = 1; : : : ; m − 1: Here Lij are the entries of L (below the diagonal). The factor L is always invertible; its inverse is again a unit lower triangular matrix. The factor U is invertible if and only if the matrix A itself is invertible. If it is, its inverse is also upper triangular. 21 1 0 03 21 0 03 21 1 0 03 EXAMPLE 41 1 1 05 = 41 1 05 40 0 1 05 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 Given A = LU; we may deal with a linear system Ax = b in two takes: solve for Ux by forward substitution and then solve (if possible) for x by backward substitution. This approach is computationally efficient. Not every matrix can be row reduced without row interchanges and so not every matrix has an LU factorization. To go around this problem, one permutes the rows of a matrix (pivoting 0 1 a 0 x y operation). For instance, it is not possible to write in the form : the 1 0 b c 0 z 1 0 relations ax = 0; ay = 1; bx = 1 are inconsistent. However, presents no difficulty. 0 1 If A does not have an LU factorization, but P is a permutation matrix such that PA has one, PA = LU; then A can be written in the form A = P −1LU = P >LU; which has many of the same virtues. 20 2 23 20 1 03 21 0 03 22 2 2 3 EXAMPLE 42 2 25 = 41 0 05 40 1 05 40 2 2 5 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 −2 The following example shows that more than one LU factorization may be possible. 21 1 03 21 0 03 21 1 03 EXAMPLE 41 1 05 = 41 1 05 40 0 05 ; correct for any x. 0 0 0 0 x 1 0 0 0 This is not the case for invertible matrices. Indeed, if A = LU = L~U~ is invertible, then L~−1L = UU~ −1: Since L~−1L is unit lower triangular and UU~ −1 is upper triangular, the preceding equality, 21 0 03 2∗ ∗ ∗3 4∗ 1 05 = 40 ∗ ∗5 ; ∗ ∗ 1 0 0 ∗ can hold only if the matrix on each side is the identity. Hence L = L~ and U = U:~ So both L and U are uniquely determined. It is sometimes possible to make U unit upper triangular at the expense of inserting a diagonal matrix factor in the middle. 21 2 33 21 0 03 21 2 3 3 21 0 03 21 0 03 21 2 33 ¯ ¯ EXAMPLE 44 5 65 = 44 1 05 40 −3 −65 = 44 1 05 40 -3 05 40 1 25 7 8 9 7 2 1 0 0 0 7 2 1 0¯ 0 0 0 0¯ 1 ¯ ¯ This is an LDU factorization. The pivot entries are grouped on the diagonal of D: When A is symmetric, this is reflected in its LDU factorization. 2 4 1 0 2 4 1 0 2 0 1 2 EXAMPLE = = 4 5 2 1 0 −3 2 1 0 −3 0 1 In this case, L = U > and so A = LDL>; highlighting the symmetry. When A is invertible, LDU leads to a quick factrorization of the inverse: A−1 = U −1D−1L−1: 2 4−1 1 2−1 2 0 −1 1 0−1 1 −2 1=2 0 1 0 EXAMPLE = = 4 5 0 1 0 −3 2 1 0 1 0 −1=3 −2 1.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us