3 Fourier and Laplace Transforms

3 Fourier and Laplace Transforms

3 Fourier and Laplace Transforms The complex exponentials exp(i2⇡nx/L) are orthonormal and easy to dif- ferentiate (and to integrate), but they are periodic with period L. If one wants to represent functions that are not periodic, a better choice is the complex exponentials exp(ikx), where k is an arbitrary real number. These orthonormal functions are the basis of the Fourier transform. The choice of complex k leads to the transforms of Laplace, Mellin, and Bromwich. 3.1 Fourier transforms The interval [ L/2,L/2] is arbitrary in the Fourier series pair (2.46) − 1 ei2⇡nx/L L/2 e i2⇡nx/L f(x)= f and f = f(x) − dx. (3.1) n p n p n= L L/2 L X1 Z− What happens when we stretch this interval without limit, letting L ? !1 We may use the nearest-integer function [y] to convert the coefficients f into a function of a continuous variable fˆ(y) f such that fˆ(y)=f n ⌘ [y] n when y n < 1/2. In terms of this function fˆ(y), the Fourier series (3.1) | − | for the function f(x)is 1 n+1/2 ei2⇡[y]x/L ei2⇡[y]x/L f(x)= fˆ(y) dy = 1 fˆ(y) dy. (3.2) p p n= n 1/2 L L X1 Z − Z1 Since [y] and y di↵er by no more than 1/2, the absolute value of the di↵erence between exp(i⇡[y]x/L) and exp(i⇡yx/L) for fixed x is i2⇡[y]x/L i2⇡yx/L i2⇡([y] y)x/L ⇡ x e e = e − 1 | | (3.3) − − ⇡ L which goes to zero as L . So in this limit, we may replace [y]byy and !1 126 Fourier and Laplace Transforms express f(x) as ei2⇡yx/L f(x)= 1 fˆ(y) dy. (3.4) pL Z1 We let y = Lk/(2⇡)sok =2⇡y/L and find for f(x) the integral Lk eikx L L Lk dk f(x)= 1 fˆ dk = 1 fˆ eikx . (3.5) 2⇡ pL 2⇡ 2⇡ 2⇡ p2⇡ Z1 ✓ ◆ Z1r ✓ ◆ Now in terms of the Fourier transform f˜(k) defined as L Lk f˜(k)= fˆ (3.6) 2⇡ 2⇡ r ✓ ◆ the integral (3.5) for f(x) is the inverse Fourier transform dk f(x)= 1 f˜(k) eikx . (3.7) p2⇡ Z1 To find f˜(k), we use its definition (3.6), the definition (3.1) of fn, our ˜ ˆ ˆ formulas f(k)= Lk/(2⇡)f(Lk/(2⇡)) and f(y)=f[y], and the inequality 2⇡[Lk/2⇡]/L k ⇡/2L to write | − p| L/2 i2⇡[ Lk ] x L/2 ˜ L L e− 2⇡ L ikx dx f(k)= f[ Lk ] = f(x) dx f(x)e− . 2⇡ 2⇡ 2⇡ L/2 pL ⇡ L/2 p2⇡ r r Z− Z− This formula becomes exact in the limit L !1 1 ikx dx f˜(k)= f(x) e− (3.8) p2⇡ Z1 and so we have the Fourier transformations 1 ikx dk 1 ikx dx f(x)= f˜(k) e and f˜(k)= f(x) e− . (3.9) p2⇡ p2⇡ Z1 Z1 The function f˜(k)istheFourier transform of f(x), and f(x)isthein- verse Fourier transform of f˜(k). In these symmetrical relations (3.9), the distinction between a Fourier transform and an inverse Fourier transform is entirely a matter of conven- tion. There is no rule for which sign, ikx or ikx, goes with which transform − or for where to put the 2⇡’s. Thus one often sees 1 ikx 1 ikx dx f(x)= f˜(k) e± dk and f˜(k)= f(x) e⌥ (3.10) 2⇡ Z1 Z1 3.1 Fourier transforms 127 as well as 1 ikx dk 1 ikx f(x)= f˜(k) e± and f˜(k)= f(x) e⌥ dx. (3.11) 2⇡ Z1 Z1 One often needs to relate a function’s Fourier series to its Fourier trans- form. So let’s compare the Fourier series (3.1) for the function f(x) on the interval [ L/2,L/2] with its Fourier transform (3.9) in the limit of large L − setting kn =2⇡n/L =2⇡y/L 1 ei2⇡nx/L 1 eiknx dk f(x)= f = f = 1 f˜(k) eikx . (3.12) n p n p p n= L n= L 2⇡ X1 X1 Z1 ˆ ˜ Since fn = f(y)=f[y], by using the definition (3.6) of f(k), we have Lk 2⇡ f = f = f = fˆ(y)=fˆ = f˜(k). (3.13) n [n] [y] 2⇡ L ✓ ◆ r Thus, to get the Fourier series from the Fourier transform, we multiply the series by 2⇡/L and use the Fourier transform at kn divided by p2⇡ 1 1 2⇡ 1 f˜(k ) f(x)= f eiknx = n eiknx. (3.14) p n L p L n= n= 2⇡ X1 X1 ˜ Going the other way, we set f(k)= L/2⇡fn = L/2⇡f[Lk/2⇡] and find dk pL f[Lk/p2⇡] f(x)= 1 f˜(k) eikx = 1 eikxdk. (3.15) p2⇡ 2⇡ pL Z1 Z1 Example 3.1 (The Fourier Transform of a Gaussian Is a Gaussian). The Fourier transform of the gaussian f(x)=exp( m2 x2)is − 1 dx ikx m2 x2 f˜(k)= e− e− . (3.16) p2⇡ Z1 We complete the square in the exponent: k2/4m2 1 dx m2 (x+ik/2m2)2 f˜(k)=e− e− . (3.17) p2⇡ Z1 As we’ll see in Sec. 5.14 when we study analytic functions, we may replace x by x ik/2m2 without changing the value of this integral. So we can drop − the term ik/2m2 in the exponential and get k2/4m2 1 dx m2 x2 1 k2/4m2 f˜(k)=e− e− = e− . (3.18) p2⇡ p2 m Z1 128 Fourier and Laplace Transforms Thus the Fourier transform of a gaussian is another gaussian 1 dx ikx m2 x2 1 k2/4m2 f˜(k)= e− e− = e− . (3.19) p2⇡ p2 m Z1 But the two gaussians are very di↵erent: if the gaussian f(x)=exp( m2x2) − decreases slowly as x because m is small (or quickly because m is big), !1 then its gaussian Fourier transform f˜(k)=exp( k2/4m2)/mp2 decreases − quickly as k because m is small (or slowly because m is big). !1 Can we invert f˜(k) to get f(x)? The inverse Fourier transform (3.7) says 1 dk ikx 1 dk 1 ikx k2/4m2 f(x)= f˜(k) e = e − . (3.20) p2⇡ p2⇡ mp2 Z1 Z1 By again completing the square in the exponent m2x2 1 dk 1 (k i2m2x)2/4m2 f(x)=e− e− − (3.21) p2⇡ mp2 Z1 and shifting the variable of integration k to k + i2m2x,wefind m2x2 1 dk 1 k2/(4m2) m2x2 f(x)=e− e− = e− (3.22) p2⇡ mp2 Z1 which is reassuring. Using (3.18) for f˜(k) and the connections (3.12–3.15) between Fourier series and transforms, we see that a Fourier series for this gaussian is in the limit of L x 2 2 1 2 2 m x 2⇡ 1 k /(4m ) iknx f(x)=e− = e− n e (3.23) L p n= 4⇡m X1 in which kn =2⇡n/L. 3.2 Fourier transforms of real functions If a function f(x) is real, then the complex conjugate of its Fourier transform (3.8) 1 dx ikx f˜(k)= f(x) e− (3.24) p2⇡ Z1 is its Fourier transform evaluated at k − 1 dx ikx f˜⇤(k)= f(x) e = f˜( k). (3.25) p2⇡ − Z1 3.2 Fourier transforms of real functions 129 It follows (exercise 3.1) that a real function f(x) satisfies the relation 1 f(x)= 1dk 1 f(y) cos k(y x) dy. (3.26) ⇡ 0 − Z Z1 If f(x) is both real and even, then 2 f(x)= 1cos kx dk 1f(y) cos ky dy (3.27) ⇡ Z0 Z0 if it is even, and 2 f(x)= 1sin kx dk 1f(y)sinky dy (3.28) ⇡ Z0 Z0 if it is odd (exercise 3.2). Example 3.2 (Dirichlet’s Discontinuous Factor). Using (3.27), one may write the square wave 1 x < 1 | | f(x)= 1 x =1 (3.29) 8 2 | | 0 x > 1 < | | as Dirichlet’s discontinuous factor: 2 sin k cos kx f(x)= 1 dk (3.30) ⇡ k Z0 (exercise 3.3). Example 3.3 (Even and Odd Exponentials). By using the Fourier-transform formulas (3.27 & 3.28), one may show that the Fourier transform of the even exponential exp( β x )is − | | β x 2 1 β cos kx e− | | = dk (3.31) ⇡ β2 + k2 Z0 while that of the odd exponential x exp( β x )/ x is − | | | | x β x 2 1 k sin kx e− | | = dk (3.32) x ⇡ β2 + k2 | | Z0 (exercise 3.4). 130 Fourier and Laplace Transforms 3.3 Dirac, Parseval, and Poisson Combining the basic equations (3.9) that define the Fourier transform, we may do something apparently useless: we may write the function f(x)in terms of itself as 1 dk ikx 1 dk ikx 1 dy iky f(x)= f˜(k) e = e e− f(y). (3.33) p2⇡ p2⇡ p2⇡ Z1 Z1 Z1 Let’s compare this equation dk f(x)= 1 dy 1 exp[ik(x y)] f(y) (3.34) 2⇡ − Z1 ✓Z1 ◆ with one (2.116) that describes Dirac’s delta function f(x)= 1 dy δ(x y) f(y).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    31 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us