Wide Association Analysis of Populus Trichocarpa Identifies Key Polymorphisms Controlling Morphological and Physiological Traits

Wide Association Analysis of Populus Trichocarpa Identifies Key Polymorphisms Controlling Morphological and Physiological Traits

Research Multitrait genome-wide association analysis of Populus trichocarpa identifies key polymorphisms controlling morphological and physiological traits Hari B. Chhetri1 , David Macaya-Sanz1, David Kainer2, Ajaya K. Biswal3,4, Luke M. Evans1, Jin-Gui Chen2, Cassandra Collins5, Kimberly Hunt5, Sushree S. Mohanty3, Todd Rosenstiel6, David Ryno4, Kim Winkeler5, Xiaohan Yang2, Daniel Jacobson2, Debra Mohnen3,4, Wellington Muchero2, Steven H. Strauss7, Timothy J. Tschaplinski2, Gerald A. Tuskan2 and Stephen P. DiFazio1 1Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; 2Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA; 3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; 4Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; 5ArborGen, Inc., 2011 Broadbank Ct., Ridgeville, SC 29472, USA; 6Department of Biology, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, USA; 7Department of Forest Ecosystems & Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Summary Author for correspondence: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have great promise for identifying the loci that Stephen P. DiFazio contribute to adaptive variation, but the complex genetic architecture of many quantitative Tel: +1 304 293 5314 traits presents a substantial challenge. Email [email protected] We measured 14 morphological and physiological traits and identified single nucleotide Received: 7 December 2018 polymorphism (SNP)-phenotype associations in a Populus trichocarpa population distributed Accepted: 22 February 2019 from California, USA to British Columbia, Canada. We used whole-genome resequencing data of 882 trees with more than 6.78 million SNPs, coupled with multitrait association to New Phytologist (2019) detect polymorphisms with potentially pleiotropic effects. Candidate genes were validated doi: 10.1111/nph.15777 with functional data. Broad-sense heritability (H2) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56 for morphological traits and 0.08 to Key words: adaptation, drought tolerance, 0.36 for physiological traits. In total, 4 and 20 gene models were detected using the genome-wide association studies (GWAS), single-trait and multitrait association methods, respectively. Several of these associations were leaf morphology, pleiotropy, Populus. corroborated by additional lines of evidence, including co-expression networks, metabolite analyses, and direct confirmation of gene function through RNAi. Multitrait association identified many more significant associations than single-trait associa- tion, potentially revealing pleiotropic effects of individual genes. This approach can be particu- larly useful for challenging physiological traits such as water-use efficiency or complex traits such as leaf morphology, for which we were able to identify credible candidate genes by com- bining multitrait association with gene co-expression and co-methylation data. Introduction Martınez et al., 2006; Ingvarsson & Street, 2011). Of the total land area on Earth, c. 31% is occupied by forests, which are of A long-standing question in evolutionary biology is the role of great ecological and economic importance (MacDicken et al., selection in shaping the spatial and temporal patterns of pheno- 2016). Therefore, understanding the factors affecting variation in typic variation (Weigel & Nordborg, 2015). In the era of traits that are important for environmental adaptation is of genomics, it is now possible to identify the molecular mecha- utmost importance, particularly in the context of rapidly chang- nisms underlying phenotypic variation on the landscape. Due to ing climates (Aitken et al., 2008). their wide geographical distribution and climatic gradients, forest Association genetics has emerged as a major tool for identify- trees are an excellent model system for testing how genetic drift, ing the genomic regions underlying traits of interest (Ingvarsson and selection affect genetic variation within a species (Neale & & Street, 2011). Using natural populations that have undergone Savolainen, 2004; Ingvarsson & Street, 2011; Neale & Kremer, many generations of recombination between ancestral haplotypes 2011; Ingvarsson et al., 2016). Forest trees generally have large allows at fine scale the identification of the genomic region affect- effective population sizes, extensive gene flow, high genetic varia- ing a trait. Nevertheless, one of the major downsides of associa- tion, and local adaptation (Neale & Savolainen, 2004; Gonzalez- tion mapping is the requirement for large numbers of loci and No claim to US Government works New Phytologist (2019) 1 New Phytologist Ó 2019 New Phytologist Trust www.newphytologist.com New 2 Research Phytologist individuals (Visscher et al., 2017). With recent advances in multitrait GWAS is a substantially more powerful approach than sequencing technologies, acquiring genomic data at a whole- single-trait GWAS in identifying molecular determinants of genome scale has become much more feasible. Nevertheless, quantitative traits, although much remaining heritable variation despite the high heritability of many morphological traits, only a remains to be identified. small proportion of heritability is explained by SNPs in most GWAS analyses, suggesting insufficient statistical power Materials and Methods (Solovieff et al., 2013). Power analyses indicated that most associ- ation studies in forest trees are orders of magnitude too small to Plantation establishment and phenotyping detect the effects of alleles of small effect and low frequency (Visscher et al., 2017) that collectively account for a large fraction The P. trichocarpa association population consisted of 1084 trees of the heritability of complex traits (Boyle et al., 2017). collected from natural populations in western Washington, Ore- While increasing sample size of GWAS populations is clearly gon (OR) and California States, and in BC (Fig. 1). The trees were desirable, it is costly and, in some cases, may not be feasible. clonally propagated from stem cuttings and planted in a common Alternatively, approaches that can improve the power of GWAS garden in Corvallis, OR in July 2009 (Evans et al., 2014). The from the same inputs can be used. One approach is to use gene- plantation consists of three blocks in a completely randomised 9 and pathway-based analysis, in which GWAS is performed on a design and the trees were planted at 2 3 m spacing. The planta- set of SNPs or genes (Kim et al., 2016). Another option is to take tionwascoppicedinDecember2010andagaininDecember a multitrait approach, in which GWAS is performed with multi- 2013. Coppiced plants were allowed to resprout and grow for one ple related traits combined in a multivariate framework. season, after which they were pruned to a single leader in January Recently, the latter approach has gained some popularity because of the following year (2012 and 2015, respectively). it offers substantial increase in power compared with the standard In December 2013, 759 trees were sampled for carbon isotope univariate approach (Porter & O’Reilly, 2017). One of the big analysis. Wood cores (12 mm) were taken from breast height of advantages of multitrait GWAS is that missing information in the tree and the 2012 growth ring was selected for analysis. one of the phenotypes in the multitrait set can be complemented Cross-sections of the wood tissue representing the entire growth – by the other phenotypes (Ritchie et al., 2015). The increased ring (c. 1.2 1.8 mg) representing early, intermediate and late ° power of multitrait GWAS depends in part on correlation among wood were sampled. The wood samples were oven-dried at 65 C traits (Porter & O’Reilly, 2017) and the combination of weak for at least 72 h, weighed and wrapped in a tin capsule before genetic effects across the traits (Casale et al., 2015). Multitrait sending to the Appalachian Ecology Laboratory in Frostburg, d13 GWAS also takes advantage of pleiotropic effects of polymor- Maryland, USA for analysis. Carbon isotope composition ( C) phisms, thereby increasing statistical power even when the traits was estimated as follows: have low correlation (Broadaway et al., 2016; Hackinger & R Zeggini, 2017). Finally, unlike analyses based on principal com- d13C ¼ sample À 1 Â 1000; ponents, multitrait GWAS effectively captures indirect genetic Rstandard effects for which a SNP affects one phenotype through its effects 13 12 on a functionally related phenotype (Stephens, 2013; Porter & where, Rsample and Rstandard are the C/ C ratios in a sample O’Reilly, 2017). and standard, respectively. Here we used the model species P. trichocarpa to explore the In July 2014, leaf characteristics were measured for 1056 trees utility of multitrait GWAS to detect genetic variants controlling (one complete block plus a subset of replicates; Table 1). The first adaptive traits. The genus Populus has a wide distribution in the and second fully expanded leaves (counting from the apex) were northern hemisphere and is dioecious, wind pollinated, and collected from a branch receiving full sunlight. One of the leaves highly heterozygous. Populus are also fast growing, easy to propa- was used for measuring petiole length and diameter with a digital gate, and demonstrate interspecific hybrid vigour, all of which caliper and then scanned using a hand-held scanner. Images were makes the genus a model system with high economic potential analysed to estimate leaf area, leaf length, leaf width and leaf

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us