Bioremediation of Drill Cuttings in an Arid Climate Bioremediation of Drill

Bioremediation of Drill Cuttings in an Arid Climate Bioremediation of Drill

Bioremediation Of Drill Cuttings In An Arid Climate RemTec 2003 OCTOBER 15-17, 2003 BANFF, ALBERTA Approach • Project Objectives • Preliminary Tasks • Environmental Constraints • Current Progress Approach Project Objectives • Technology transfer with local company • To conduct the project in a safe and environmentally prudent manner • To bioremediate the organic constituents in oil- based drill cuttings. • Determine the most optimum onsite technique. Background • Independent E& P company • Operate in 13 Countries • Operations in Egypt since 1995 • 11,500 BOE/Day • 165 Employees Background Background Background Background Tasks Preliminary Tasks: • Identify local contractors • Determine site location • Identify heavy equipment availability • Collect and analyze soil samples • Collect and analyze oil-based drill cuttings Constraints Environmental Constraints: • Arid climate • High evaporation rate • Extreme temperatures • Lack of nutrients • Lack of microorganisms Construction System Design: • Area: 1 Hectare • 20 ml liner • Soil berms-3 ft high • Plot layout Construction Construction Construction Construction Treatments 4 Test Amendments Plastic Cover & Plastic Cover & Fertilizer 3 Manure 4 Straw Cover & Straw Cover & Fertilizer 2 Manure 1 Treatments Treatments Treatments Treatments Treatments Monitoring Program Field Monitoring pH Moisture content Temperature Conductivity • Monitoring determined frequency of aeration, watering, and nutrients Monitoring Program Laboratory Results Lab Analysis Program: • Background samples to obtain baseline data of trace metals and chloride concentrations. • Oil based drill cuttings will be sampled for oil content, trace metals, and chlorides. Laboratory Results Lab Analysis Program Continued: Chemical and biological analysis TPH Heavy metals (leachable) Chloride (or major anions) Phosphates Nitrates Standard Plate Count Laboratory Results Microbial Identification: Chicken Manure • Curtobacterium Albidum Bacillus sp • Thiobacillus versutus • Enterobacter agglomerans aerogenic Hydrocarbon Degraders • Acinetobacter lwoffi • Pseudomonas putida • Pseudomonas aminovorans Total Soil Bacteria Count - 11,000,000 MPN/gm Laboratory Results Section 1 - 2001 160,000 140,000 120,000 g/g) µ 100,000 EPH(nC10-nC19) 80,000 EPH(nC19-nC32) 60,000 Concentration ( 40,000 20,000 0 January April June November Sample Date Laboratory Results Section 2 - 2001 160,000 140,000 120,000 g/g) µ 100,000 EPH(nC10-nC19) 80,000 EPH(nC19-nC32) 60,000 Concentration ( 40,000 20,000 0 January April June November Sample Date Laboratory Results Section 3 - 2001 160,000 140,000 g/g) 120,000 100,000 80,000 EPH(nC10-nC19) 60,000 EPH(nC19-nC32) 40,000 Concentration ( 20,000 0 April June January November Sample Date Laboratory Results Section 4 - 2001 160,000 140,000 g/g) 120,000 100,000 EPH(nC10-nC19) 80,000 60,000 EPH(nC19-nC32) Concentration ( 40,000 20,000 0 April June January November Sample Date Current Progress System Re-design: • Plastic covering was discontinued and straw was replaced. • Fertilizer was discontinued and manure was continued. Original Fertilizer Original Manure 2 1 Holding Area for Future Cuttings 4 3 Current Progress Section 1 - 2003 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 EPH(nC6-nC19) 80,000 EPH(nC19-nC28) 60,000 40,000 Concentration (mg/g) 20,000 0 January April June November April ** Sample Date ** April stats are TPH (nC6-nC12) and TPH (nC12-nC28) Total TPH (C6-C35) = 7600 Current Progress Section 2 - 2003 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 EPH(nC6-nC19) 80,000 EPH(nC19-nC28) 60,000 40,000 Concentration (mg/g) 20,000 0 January April June November April ** Sample Date ** April stats are TPH (nC6-nC12) and TPH (nC12-nC28) Total TPH (C6-C35) =1200 Current Progress Project Objectives: Initial Goal Achieved Not Achieved Technology transfer √ Conduct project safely √ Bioremediate OBM √ Determine optimum technique √ Current Progress • September 2003: Started C-1 OBM Cuttings bioremediation. • Bioremediation has become the Devon’s preferred waste management method in Egypt. • Bioremediation has been approved by Egypt’s EEAA permitting process. Comments & Questions.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    37 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us