The 2020 Annual Meeting of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society

The 2020 Annual Meeting of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society

DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22298 ABSTRACTS The 2020 Annual Meeting of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society 1 | Accounting for cumulative effects of 2 | Racial differences in methylation time‐varying exposures in the analyses of pathway‐structured predictive models and gene‐environment interactions breast cancer survival Michal Abrahamowicz*, Coraline Danieli Tomi Akinyemiju1*, Abby Zhang2, April Deveaux1, Lauren Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Wilson1, Stella Aslibekyan3 Montreal, Canada 1Duke University, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA; 2Duke University, College of Arts and Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA; 3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Assessing gene‐environment interactions requires Department of Epidemiology, Birmingham, Alabama, USA careful modeling of how the environmental exposure affects the outcome.[1] For interactions with time‐ varying exposures, such as air pollution, one needs to Background: Black women are more likely to develop account for cumulative effects.[1,2] We propose, and aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtypes and have poorer validate in simulations, flexible modeling of interac- prognosis compared with White women. Differential tions between genetic factors and time‐varying ex- DNA methylation (DNAm) is associated with BC mor- posures with cumulative effects. Weighed cumulative tality; race‐stratified analysis of DNAm‐derived gene exposure (WCE) models cumulative effects through pathways may help to identify biological mechanisms weighed mean of past exposure intensities.[3] The driving survival disparities. weight function w(t), that quantifies the relative im- Methods: Publically available breast cancer clinical portance of exposures at different times, is estimated and DNA methylation data were downloaded from with cubic B‐splines. Interactions with genotype or TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov). We adapted a two‐ sex, are assessed by comparing fit to data of three stage approach (Zhang, 2017) to incorporate pathway alternative WCE models.[3] Model 1 assumes no in- information into a predictive survival model: calculating teractions that is, common w(t) for all subgroups. a pathway risk score with Bayesian hierarchical Cox Model 2 assumes the same shapes of subgroup‐specific modeling using methylation and gene expression data, w(t)'s but different effect strengths. Model 3 assumes then combining clinical data and pathway risk scores into past exposure effects cumulate differently across the an integrated prediction model. subgroups, implying different shapes of w(t).Like- Results: We included 982 (169 AA, 813 White) pa- lihood ratio tests help identify the model most tients and analyzed 19,775 genes with methylation data. consistent with the data.[3] Using the KEGG pathway annotations, we mapped 2,760 Simulation results validate the proposed models genes to 64 pathways. Among the 982 patients, the and tests. We illustrate real‐life advantages of the WCE mortality event rate was 15.6%. The overall survival (OS) modeling by re‐assessing interactions between sex and predictive model including all patients showed upregu- low‐doseradiationincancer.[4] Flexible cumulative lation of AMPK, estrogen, and focal adhesion pathways, effects modeling may yield novel insights regarding and downregulation of platelet activation. MAPK sig- interactions between genotype and time‐varying naling and cell cycle pathway were upregulated in pre- exposures. dictive models among whites and among blacks. [1] McAllister et al, AJE 2019:753‐61 Pathways that were uniquely associated with OS in race‐ [2] Cruz‐Fuentes et al, Brain and Behavior 2014: stratified models were oxytocin and lysosomal signaling 290‐297 in whites, and Rap1, glycolysis, and insulin signaling in [3] Danieli & Abrahamowicz, SMMR 2019:248‐262 blacks. Pathway associations in the progression‐free [4] Danieli et al, AJE 2019:1552‐1562. survival (PFS) model mirrored the OS model. Genetic Epidemiology. 2020;44:469–533. www.geneticepi.org © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | 469 470 | ABSTRACTS Conclusion: Significant differences in pathway sig- frequency estimates within databases, such as gnomAD, natures predictive of OS and PFS between whites and to match the global ancestry proportions of a target blacks may highlight specific biological mechanisms sample or individual. The resulting estimated ancestry underlying aggressive BC in Black women, and present proportions have high accuracy and precision, but are new targets for intervention. limited by the ancestry groups present in the reference data set. Simply put, if the ancestry group is not within the reference data set, the proportion of that ancestry 3 | Effect of population stratification on cannot be estimated. SNP‐by‐environment interaction Here, we update our method by estimating the pro- portion of reference ancestries and the least‐square error 1 2,3 1,4,5 Jaehoon An *, Christoph Lange , Sungho Won while leaving out one reference ancestry at a time. This 1Department of Public Health Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, enables us to estimate a “missing” ancestry's proportion 2 Korea; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public and similarity (i.e., Fst) with the given reference popu- Health, Boston, Massachusetts; 3Channing Division of Network Medicine, 4 lations. We use the ancestry proportion estimates, in- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; cluding for the hidden ancestry, to update allele 5Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, frequencies to match a target sample or individual. We Seoul, Korea evaluate our method in both simulations and real data using 1000 Genomes as reference data, and gnomAD as our target sample. Our method improves the utility and Proportions of false‐positive rates in genome‐wide asso- equity of genetic databases of allele frequencies especially ciation analysis are affected by population stratification, for admixed samples and individuals. and if it is not correctly adjusted, the statistical analysis can produce the large false‐negative finding. Therefore, various approaches have been proposed to adjust such problems in genome‐wide association studies. However, 5 | Multi‐omic strategies for in spite of its importance, a few studies have been con- transcriptome‐wide prediction and ducted in genome‐wide single‐nucleotide polymorphism association studies (SNP)‐by‐environment interaction studies. In this report, 1 2 we illustrate in which scenarios can lead to the false‐ Arjun Bhattacharya , Hudson J. Santos , Michael I. 1,3 positive rates in association mapping and approach to Love maintaining the overall type‐1 error rate. 1Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2Department of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 3Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 4 | Estimation of non‐reference ancestry proportions in genotype frequency data Traditional predictive models for transcriptome‐wide as- sociation studies (TWAS) consider only single nucleotide Ian S. Arriaga‐Mackenzie1*, Audrey E. Hendricks1,2 polymorphisms (SNPs) local to genes of interest and 1 Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver; perform parameter shrinkage entirely with a regulariza- 2Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus tion process. These approaches ignore the effect of distal SNPs or the functionality of the SNP‐gene interaction. Here, we outline multi‐omic strategies for transcriptome Large, publicly available genotype frequency databases, imputation from germline genetics for testing gene‐trait such as the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), associations by prioritizing distal SNPs to the gene of are invaluable resources in the study of health and dis- interest. In one extension, we identify mediating bio- ease. However, summarizing data into genotype fre- markers (CpG sites, microRNAs, and transcription fac- quencies can mask heterogeneity, such as population tors) highly associated with gene expression and train structure, within and between samples. This limits the predictive models for these mediators using their cis‐ utility of this data, especially for ancestrally diverse po- genotypes. Imputed values for mediators are then in- pulations. We have recently developed a method that can corporated into the eventual model as fixed effects with estimate ancestry proportions in summary data using cis‐genotypes to the gene included as regularized effects. allele frequencies from reference ancestries. The esti- In the second extension, we assess trans‐ eQTLs for their mated ancestry proportions can be used to update allele mediation effect through mediators local to these ABSTRACTS | 471 trans‐SNPs. Highly mediated trans‐eQTLs are then up- pressure) improves performance over CM to characterize weighted in the eventual transcriptomic prediction direct/indirect SNP associations. By application to the model. We empirically show the utility of these exten- Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, we illustrate sions in TCGA breast cancer data and in ROSMAP brain feasibility and obtain results for multiple T1DCs com- tissue data, showing considerable gains in percent var- paring contemporaneous and cumulative effects of iance explained of approximately 1–2%. We then use HbA1c according to established HbA1c exposure effects.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    65 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us