Northern Indiana Ohio Passenger Rail Corridor Feasibility Study And

Northern Indiana Ohio Passenger Rail Corridor Feasibility Study And

NORTHERN INDIANA/OHIO PASSENGER RAIL CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLAN 1.1 OVERVIEW OF EXISTING TRAVEL MARKET ............................................................................ 1-1 1.2 STUDY PROCESS ........................................................................................................... 1-8 1.3 REPORT STRUCTURE .................................................................................................... 1-10 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 2-1 3.1 OVERVIEW OF EXISTING TRAVEL MARKET ........................................................................... 3-1 3.2 BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE COMPASS™ TRAVEL MARKET FORECAST MODEL .............................. 3-1 3.3 ZONE DEFINITION ........................................................................................................ 3-3 3.4 SOCIOECONOMIC BASELINE AND PROJECTIONS ..................................................................... 3-4 3.5 EXISTING TRAVEL MODES ............................................................................................... 3-6 3.6 ORIGIN-DESTINATION TRIP DATABASE .............................................................................. 3-9 3.7 FUTURE TRAVEL MARKET STRATEGIES ............................................................................. 3-11 3.7.1 FUEL PRICE FORECASTS ..................................................................................... 3-11 3.7.2 VEHICLE FUEL EFFICIENCY FORECAST .................................................................... 3-13 3.4.3 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONGESTION ......................................................................... 3-14 3.8 CORRIDOR TRAVEL MARKET FORECASTS WITHOUT PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE ........................... 3-15 3.9 CORRIDOR TRAVEL MARKET FORECASTS WITH PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE ................................. 3-17 4.1 CONTEXT OF THE ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT ....................................................................... 4-1 4.2 HISTORICAL CONTEXT FOR THE STUDY .............................................................................. 4-2 4.3 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT CATEGORIES AND UNIT COSTS .............................................. 4-4 4.4 INFRASTRUCTURE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 4-8 4.4.1 COLUMBUS TO CP MOUNDS .................................................................................. 4-8 4.4.2 CP MOUNDS TO DUNKIRK .................................................................................. 4-14 4.4.3 DUNKIRK TO FORT WAYNE ................................................................................. 4-18 Prepared by Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. December 2012 | Page ii NORTHERN INDIANA/OHIO PASSENGER RAIL CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLAN 4.4.4 FORT WAYNE TO TOLLESTON .............................................................................. 4-28 4.4.5 130-MPH ENHANCEMENTS TO THE FORT WAYNE TO TOLLESTON SEGMENT .................... 4-34 4.4.6 COMPARISON TO 2007 OHIO HUB PLAN ............................................................... 4-36 4.5 ROLLING STOCK COST ................................................................................................. 4-37 4.6 CAPITAL COST SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 4-38 4.7 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ................................................................................................ 4-38 5.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 TRAIN TECHNOLOGY ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................................. 5-2 5.3 TRAIN PERFORMANCE AND SCHEDULE – DIESEL – 110 AND DIESEL 130 .................................... 5-3 5.4 TRAIN TIMETABLE AND CYCLING ...................................................................................... 5-5 5.5 OPERATING COSTS ........................................................................................................ 5-8 5.5.1 VARIABLE COSTS .............................................................................................. 5-11 5.5.2 FIXED ROUTE COSTS ......................................................................................... 5-14 5.6 2030 OPERATING COST RESULT .................................................................................... 5-19 6.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................ 6-1 6.2 FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES ............................................................................. 6-2 6.2.1 KEY ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................................................. 6-4 6.2.2 ESTIMATE OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS .......................................................................... 6-5 6.3 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 6-9 6.3.1 FINANCIAL RESULTS ............................................................................................ 6-9 6.3.2 ECONOMIC RESULTS .......................................................................................... 6-15 6.4 DIESEL 130 SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE COST SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ..................................... 6-30 7.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 7-1 7.2 THE CHARACTER OF THE OVERALL ECONOMY ...................................................................... 7-1 Prepared by Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. December 2012 | Page iii NORTHERN INDIANA/OHIO PASSENGER RAIL CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLAN 7.3 ASSESSING SUPPLYSIDE BENEFITS ..................................................................................... 7-4 7.4 DATA SOURCES AND STUDY DATABASE ............................................................................. 7-6 7.5 SUPPLY SIDE ANALYSIS RESULTS: DERIVING ECONOMIC RENT ELASTICITIES ................................ 7-7 7.5.1 CALCULATING SENSITIVITIES ................................................................................. 7-7 7.5.2 PRELIMINARY RESULTS ...................................................................................... 7-10 7.5.2.1 JOB TYPE CREATION ........................................................................... 7-11 7.5.3 INCOME BENEFITS ............................................................................................ 7-12 7.5.4 PROPERTY VALUES ........................................................................................... 7-13 7.6 TRANSFER PAYMENT ANALYSIS RESULT ........................................................................... 7-13 7.6.1 FEDERAL AND STATE INCREASED INCOME TAX BASE ................................................. 7-13 7.7 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 7-14 7.7.1 ECONOMIC BENEFITS TO THE ECONOMY (SUPPLYSIDE ANALYSIS) ................................. 7-14 8.1 OVERALL FINDINGS ....................................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 FINANCIAL BENEFITS ...................................................................................................... 8-4 8.3 BENEFIT COST .............................................................................................................. 8-4 8.4 ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (SUPPLYSIDE) ........................................................................ 8-5 Prepared by Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. December 2012 | Page iv NORTHERN INDIANA/OHIO PASSENGER RAIL CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLAN The purpose of this Feasibility Study and Business Plan is to evaluate the case for developing high- speed rail operations in the Northern Indiana/Ohio Passenger Rail Corridor between Chicago, Fort Wayne, and Columbus. The Chicago-Fort Wayne-Columbus corridor (Exhibit 1-1) was initially proposed in the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative (MWRRI) 2004 (Phase 5) which is federally approved and was incorporated into the Ohio and Lake Erie Regional Rail: Ohio Hub Study (2007) as an incremental corridor. These proposals were for 110 mph Diesel technology service linking Chicago with Northwest Indiana, Northeast Indiana, and Central Ohio (Exhibits 1-2 and 1-3). Prepared by Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. December 2012 | Page 1-1 NORTHERN INDIANA/OHIO PASSENGER RAIL CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLAN Prepared by Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. December 2012 | Page 1-2 NORTHERN INDIANA/OHIO PASSENGER RAIL CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLAN Prepared by Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. December 2012 | Page 1-3 NORTHERN INDIANA/OHIO PASSENGER RAIL CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLAN The proposed service parallels some of the most congested highway corridors in the US including I-80, I-94 and I-90 in the Chicago, Northwest Indiana (Gary) area, where all the east-west connections for the northern part of the country are forced together by Lake Michigan. This creates a major bottleneck, which will only become more congested in the future. In addition, the

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    211 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us