Giedrė Mickūnaitė Lithuania: let’s celebrate the anniversary of greatness [A stampa in Fifteen-Year Anniversary Reports, a cura di M. Sághy, “Annual of Medieval Studies at CEU” (Central European University, Budapest), ed. by J. A. Rasson and B. Zsolt Szakács, vol. 15 (2009), pp. 257-263 © dell’autore – Distribuito in formato digitale da “Reti Medievali”]. LITHUANIA: LET’S CELEBRATE THE ANNIVERSARY OF GREATNESS Giedrė Mickūnaitė Such an academic discipline as “medieval studies” does not exist in Lithuania; however, the Middle Ages are present on the academic, cultural, and political scene and lately this presence has increased somewhat. St. Bruno of Querfurt is at fault here. According to the “Annals of Quedlinburg”, the bishop parted with his life in confi nio Rusciae at Lituae in the year 1009. Th e decapitation of St. Bruno not only earned him the martyr’s glory, but also entered Lithuania into the world of the written word; in 2009 the country celebrates a millennium of its name. I do not know whether it was someone from academia who passed the millennium idea to politicians, but academics have received their share of the funding granted by the so-called Millennium Directorate1 for research, conferences, and publications. Th us, regardless of nonexistent “medieval studies”, some of the millenarian research has been concerned with the Middle Ages and most of it is associated with yet another political initiative: the (re?) building of the grand ducal palace in Vilnius. Since the parliament passed the special rebuilding law in 1994, additional energy has been dedicated to archaeological and scholarly eff ort. I shall not dwell here on the controversial sides of this (re?)construction,2 but will discuss its contribution to historical research. Archaeological excavations have not only provided new objects ranging from fragments of wall paintings executed in the Byzantine style and objects decorated with images on courtly subjects, but also off ered data rectifying earlier interpretations of the urban development of Vilnius and the building of grand ducal residences there.3 In addition to excavations, scholars have been summoned to search for sources related to the palace under construction 1 “Directorate for the Commemoration of the Millennium of Lithuania under the Auspices of the Offi ce of the President of the Republic of Lithuania,” http://www.lietuvai1000.lt/index.en.htm 2 For a critical analysis of the (re?)construction see Lietuvos Didžiosios Kunigaikštystės Valdovų rūmų atkūrimo byla: vieno požiūrio likimas [Th e Case of the Reconstruction of the Palace of the Lithuanian Grand Dukes: Th e Fate of One Viewpoint], ed. Alfredas Bumblauskas (Vilnius: V U leidykla, 2006); the offi cial position is given in Napalys Kitkauskas, Lietuvos Didžiosios Kunigaikštystės valdovų rūmai [Th e Palace of the Lithuanian Grand Dukes] (Vilnius: Kultūra, 2009). 3 Vilniaus Žemutinės pilies rūmai [Th e Palace in the Lower Castle of Vilnius], 5 vols. (Vilnius: L II and “Lietuvos pilys, 1989–2003). 257 Giedrė Mickūnaitė and thus materials not yet used for the study of Lithuanian history have been brought to light.4 Th ese millenarian ambitions, in fact, had a kind of rehearsal in 2003, when the 750th anniversary of the coronation of Lithuania’s fi rst and only king, Mindaugas (r. 1253–1263), was celebrated. In addition to a statue of the king, studies and collection of sources pertaining to his reign have been published.5 Th e king’s jubilee pushed the popular understanding of Lithuania’s history back to the thirteenth century and was used to propagate the idea that since the Catholic baptism of Mindaugas in 1251 the country has preferred Western civilization. By the same token, the pagan past, well popularized in the Soviet period, has lost favor for the sake of the civilizing role of Latin Christianity. Luckily, the long tradition of research into pre-Christian beliefs was crowned with the four volumes of Sources on Baltic Religion and Mythology.6 Lithuania, like many other EU countries of the former Soviet block, aspires to mediate between Europe’s East and West; however, in contrast to its rivals, Lithuania claims to have historical experience, the “multiethnic and multi- religious” Grand Duchy, which makes her fi t for the mediator’s role. For this popular understanding of the country’s more remote, but not necessarily medieval, past credit must be given to professor Alfredas Bumblauskas, who in addition to teaching history at Vilnius University, authors and presents shows on history on national TV. Today the Grand Duchy is part of national pride, in contrast to the interwar period, which regarded the polonised Grand Duchy as somewhat inferior for not being a nation state. 4 Vilniaus Žemutinė pilis XIV a. – XIX a. pradžioje: 2002–2004 m. istorinių šaltinių paieškos [Th e Lower Castle of Vilnius from the Fourteenth to the Early Nineteenth Century: Th e Search for Historical Sources, 2002–2004], ed. Raimonda Ragauskienė (Vilnius: Pilių tyrimo centras, 2006); Vilniaus Žemutinė pilis XIV a. – XIX a. pradžioje: 2005–2006 m. tyrimai [Th e Lower Castle of Vilnius from the Fourteenth to the Early Nineteenth Century: Research from 2005–2006], ed. Liudas Glemža (Vilnius: Pilių tyrimo centras, 2007). 5 Edvardas Gudavičius, Mindaugas (Vilnius: Žara, 1998); Mindaugo knyga: istorijos šaltiniai apie Lietuvos karalių [Th e Book of Mindaugas: Historical Sources about the King of Lithuania], ed. Artūras Dubonis et al. (Vilnius: Lietuvos istorijos instituto leidykla, 2005); Mindaugas karalius [King Mindaugas], ed. Vytautas Ališauskas (Vilnius: Aidai, 2008). 6 Baltų religijos ir mitologijos šaltiniai/Sources of Baltic Religion and Mythology/Quellen der baltischen Religion und Mythologie, ed. Norbertas Vėlius, 4 vols. (Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla, 1996–2005). 258 Lithuania: Let’s Celebrate the Anniversary of Greatness As to why the Middle Ages has not constituted a separate fi eld in studying national history,7 my answer is twofold: on the one hand because of the scarcity of medieval sources; on the other because the Middle Ages is a chronological part of the history of the Grand Duchy. To my mind, the latter assumption should be given more credibility, as Lithuania’s troubled statehood has placed the state atop the historical hierarchy. Th erefore, the periodization of the past follows the existence of the state. Hence, the thirteenth to eighteenth centuries are known as the Grand Duchy of Lithuania; the long nineteenth century is a time under the tsarist yoke, which was swept away by the establishment of the republic in 1918, which was broken by three consecutive occupations, and today’s Republic of Lithuania continues what was terminated in 1940. Th e period before the thirteenth century is termed prehistory and largely relies on archaeological research. Luckily, the above populist picture has quite a number of exceptions that make quality contributions to medieval studies. Critical editions of the Lithuanian Metrica and its research are augmenting and providing not only written sources, but also giving insights into how the grand ducal chancellery operated and on the growing authority of a written document.8 Grand Duke Gediminas’ (r. 1316–1341) letters addressed to merchants and artisans along the Baltic coast as well as those to the papacy have received a new critical edition meticulously prepared by Stephen C. Rowell.9 Narrative sources also enjoy scholarly attention resulting in critical translations and novel interpretations on their compilations and changing functions.10 Pieces of Neo-Latin literature 7 In Lithuania, non-national history is hardly thinkable for several reasons, among which I would specify: (1) a general lack of resources; (2) the historical research of Lithuanian authors on non-Lithuanian subjects cannot compete with translations on the same topics; and (3) Lithuanian academics have lobbied successfully to have Lithuanian studies (termed Lituanistica) listed as a priority research area which is funded under separate programmes by the Lithuanian State Science and Studies Foundation and some EU frameworks and given more points in annual ratings compiled by the Centre for Quality Assessment in Higher Education. 8 Th e Metrica served as a primary source for the work of Jurgita Kunsmanaitė, “Provisions for Widowhood in the Legal Sources of Sixteenth-Century Lithuania,” Ph.D. dissertation (Budapest: Central European University, 2009). 9 Chartularium Lithuaniae res gestas magni ducis Gedeminne illustrans/Gedimino laiškai, tr. and ed. S. C. Rowell (Vilnius: Vaga, 2003). 10 E.g., Vygandas Marburgietis [Wigand von Marburg], Naujoji Prūsijos kronika [New Prussian Chronicle], tr. and ed. Rimantas Jasas, Lituanistinė biblioteka 30 (Vilnius: Vaga, 1999); Petras Dusburgietis [Petrus de Dusburg], Prūsijos žemės kronika [Chronicle of the Prussian Land], tr. Leonas Valkūnas, ed. Romas Batūra (Vilnius: Versus aureus, 2005). 259 Giedrė Mickūnaitė have appeared in bilingual editions11 and translations of a number of early modern texts have been published. In fact, the fi eld of literature has thus far been the most international, supplying the Lithuanian audience with a series of medieval classics in translation.12 Th e third fi eld that has not only opened but is also gaining strength is the translation of Christian sources ranging from the early Church Fathers to monastic rules and publications on the religious heritage in Lithuania. Considering research, a few monographs based on doctoral dissertations must be listed as pioneering in interdisciplinary medieval studies rather than presenting historical research in the narrow sense. Darius Baronas’ study on the three martyrs of Vilnius13 opened a long-neglected inquiry into the Orthodox tradition. Baronas examines the biographies and the cult of the martyrs (killed ca. 1347) in the contexts of grand ducal policy, noble kinship, and confessions. Th e study traces the spread of devotion to the martyrs and reveals mechanisms that sustained their popularity. Th e useful appendixes off er a selection of martyrs’ lives from the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Muscovy, Byzantium, and the Balkans.