239315 TOA Patent Litigation P2 1..76

239315 TOA Patent Litigation P2 1..76

Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 1st Media, LLC v. Elec. Arts Inc. ................................................. 1-69 2 Hounds Design, Inc. v. Brezinski ........................................... 10-20 3D Sys., Inc. v. Aarotech Labs., Inc. ...................................3-29, 3-30 3M Co. v. Avery Dennison Corp. ................................................ 3-24 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United States ................................. 14-8 55 Brake, LLC v. Audi of Am. ..................................................... 3-55 A A123 Sys., Inc. v. Hydro-Quebec ........................................2-43, 2-44 aaiPharma, Inc. v. Kremers Urban Dev. Co. ............................... 4-76 A&E Prods. Grp., L.P. v. Mainetti USA, Inc. ............................... 5-44 ABB Inc. v. Cooper Indus.,LLC ................................................... 3-23 Abbott Labs. v. Andrx Pharm., Inc. ................................10-11, 10-14 Abbott Labs. v. Diamedix Corp. .................................................. 3-40 Abbott Labs. v. Geneva Pharm., Inc. ........................................... 1-43 Abbott Labs. v. Sandoz, Inc. ................................... 1-14, 2-34, 10-17 Abbott Labs., Inc. v. Baxter Pharm. Prods., Inc. .......................... 1-40 Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. Navinta LLC ...................................... 2-43 ABT Sys., LLC v. Emerson Elec. Co. ........................................... 9-34 A.C. Aukerman Co. v. R.L. Chaides Constr. Co. ..............1-25, 1-71, ................................................................. 1-72, 2-29, 5-63, 12-39 Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. ........................ 5-42 Acer Am. Corp., In re .........................................................3-46, 3-47 Achates Reference Publ’g v. Apple Inc. ...................................... 13-11 Aclara Biosciences, Inc. v. Caliper Tech. Corp. ................................... 5-35, 5-54, 5-70, 5-73 ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Commc’ns, Inc. ................8-49, 9-10, 9-32, 9-47, 12-49 Actos (Pioglitazone) Prods. Liab. Litig., In re ............................. 12-26 (Pat. Litigation, Rel. #5, 4/18) T–1 PATENT LITIGATION Acumed LLC v. Stryker Corp. .................................................... 10-33 Adams v. Burke ............................................................................ 1-76 Adang v. Fischoff ......................................................................... 1-57 Additive Controls & Measurement Sys., Inc. v. Flowdata, Inc. ..........................................................10-28, 10-38 Adenta GmbH v. OrthoArm, Inc. ............................................... 3-25 AdjustaCam, LLC v. Newegg, Inc. ......................................9-63, 9-64 Advance Transformer Co. v. Levinson ....................................... 14-36 Advanced Aero. Techs., Inc. v. United States .................14-14, 14-27 Advanced Cardiovascular Sys. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. ........ 13-11 Advanced Cardiovascular Sys., Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. .......4-62, 4-64, ............................................................................ 4-78, 5-19, 5-20 Advanced Cardiovascular Sys., Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. .......7-58, 9-55 Advanced Cardiovascular Sys., Inc. v. SciMed Life Sys., Inc. ..............................................14-41, 14-42 Advanced Commc’ns Design, Inc. v. Premier Retail Networks, Inc. ............................................ 10-18 Advanced Display Sys., Inc. v. Kent State Univ. .............12-51, 12-52 Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc. v. Rome Fastener Corp. ...................................................2-25, 9-65 Advanced Semiconductor Prods., Inc. v. Tau Lab., Inc. ............... 4-94 Advanced Software Design Corp. v. Fed. Reserve Bank of St. Louis ............................................ 14-10 Advanced Video Techs. LLC v. HTC Corp. ................................. 3-40 A.E. Finley & Assocs. v. United States ...................................... 14-26 Aero Prods. Int’l Inc. v. Intex Recreation Corp. ............................. 9-6 Aerolink Int’l v. Colonial Parking ................................................ 4-57 Aevoe Corp. v. AE Tech Co. ...................................................... 13-12 Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC v. BMW N. Am., LLC ........................ 9-44 Affymetrix, Inc., In re .................................................................. 3-46 AFP Advanced Food Prods. LLC v. Snyder’s of Hanover Mfg., Inc. ............................................. 3-55 AFGE, Local 922 v. Ashcroft ..................................................... 12-26 Agfa Corp. v. Creo Prods., Inc. ...........................................5-9, 12-44 Agilent Techs., Inc. v. Affymetrix, Inc. ...................................... 14-33 Agilent Techs., Inc. v. Micromuse, Inc. ....................................... 3-39 Aiken v. Bus. & Indus. Health Grp., Inc. .................................... 4-73 Air Turbine Tech., Inc. v. Atlas Copco AB ..........................8-12, 8-22 Air-Shields, Inc. v. Boc Grp., Inc. ................................................ 7-53 Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Cable & Wireless Internet Servs., Inc. .....................................8-31, 12-49 Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. ....................... 1-13, ............................................................................ 4-80, 7-30, 9-15 Akeva LLC v. Mizuno Corp. ........................................................ 5-59 T–2 Table of Authorities Akzo v. U.S. ITC ......................................................................... 1-40 Ala. Aircraft Indus. v. Boeing Co. ................................................ 4-97 Albert v. Kevex Corp. ................................................................. 14-36 Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co. ...................... 1-39 Alexsam, Inc. v. IDT Corp. ......................................................... 8-35 Alfred E. Mann Found. for Sci. Research v. Cochlear Corp. ........ 2-43 Ali v. Carnegie Inst. of Wash. ...........................................3-40, 14-40 Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l ..................... 1-64, 6-6, 14-65 Alldread v. City of Grenada ......................................................... 5-46 Allen v. Takeda (In re Actos (Pioglitazone) Prods. Liab. Litig.) .... 12-26 Allen Eng’g Corp. v. Bartell Indus., Inc. ...................................... 2-26 Allen Organ Co. v. Kimball Int’l, Inc. ......................................... 1-69 Allendale Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bull Data Sys., Inc. ........................... 5-37 Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex Inc. ........................................................ 8-11 Allflex USA, Inc. v. Avid Identification Sys. Inc. ....................... 13-30 Allied Mar., Inc. v. Rice Corp. ................................................... 12-59 Alloc, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n .............................................. 14-62 Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. ........................................................... 3-26 Altera Corp., In re ..............................................................3-46, 3-47 Altiris v. Symantec Corp. ............................................................ 1-14 AM Int’l, Inc. v. United States .........................................14-8, 14-12 Amado v. Microsoft Corp. ........................................................... 9-44 Amazon.com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble.com, Inc. .............10-11, 10-26 Ambrose v. Steelcase, Inc. ........................................................... 5-39 AMEC Civil, LLC v. DMJM Harris, Inc. ..................................... 5-30 Am. Calcar, Inc. v. Am. Honda Motor Co. ............................... 12-44 Am. Cyanamid Co. v. Hercules Powder Co. ............................... 5-23 Am. Express Warehousing, Ltd. v. Transamerica Ins. Co. ......... 4-102 Am. GNC Corp. v. LG Elecs. U.S.A., Inc. .................................. 4-34 Am. Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc. .......................... 1-67 Am. Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Co. v. NWI-I, Inc. ........................ 5-66 Am. Med. Sys. v. Laser Peripherals, LLC ..................................... 4-28 Am. Med. Sys., Inc. v. Med. Eng’g Corp. ...........................2-48, 9-61 Am. Permahedge, Inc. v. Barcana, Inc. ........................................ 7-17 Am. Seating Co. v. USSC Grp., Inc. ........................................... 9-25 Am. Sec. Co. v. Shatterproof Glass Co. ....................................... 2-56 Am. Standard, Inc. v. Lyons Indus. ........................................... 10-25 Am. Standard, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc. ..........................................5-5, 5-23 Amgen, Inc. v. Ariad Pharm., Inc. ......................................4-51, 7-44 Amgen, Inc. v. Chugai Pharm. Co. ............................................. 1-58 Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. .......... 3-57, 5-45, 5-46 Amobi v. D.C. Dep’t of Corr. .............................................5-46, 5-49 AMP, Inc. v. Lantrans, Inc. .......................................................... 9-19 AMP, Inc. v. Molex, Inc. .............................................................. 4-63 (Pat. Litigation, Rel. #5, 4/18) T–3 PATENT LITIGATION AMP Plus, Inc. v. Juno Lighting, Inc. ........................................ 13-13 Ampicillin Antitrust Litig., In re ............................................5-3, 5-8 Amstar Corp. v. Envirotech Corp. ..................................12-58,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    76 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us