Probing the Black Hole Metric. I. Black Hole Shadows and Binary Black-Hole Inspirals Dimitrios Psaltis,1 Colm Talbot,2 Ethan Payne,3, 4 and Ilya Mandel3, 4, 5 1Steward Observatory and Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 2LIGO Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia 4OzGrav: The ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia 5Birmingham Institute for Gravitational Wave Astronomy and School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom In General Relativity, the spacetimes of black holes have three fundamental properties: (i) they are the same, to lowest order in spin, as the metrics of stellar objects; (ii) they are independent of mass, when expressed in geometric units; and (iii) they are described by the Kerr metric. In this paper, we quantify the upper bounds on potential black-hole metric deviations imposed by observations of black-hole shadows and of binary black-hole inspirals in order to explore the current experimental limits on possible violations of the last two predictions. We find that both types of experiments provide correlated constraints on deviation parameters that are primarily in the tt-components of the spacetimes, when expressed in areal coordinates. We conclude that, currently, there is no evidence for a deviations from the Kerr metric across the 8 orders of magnitudes in masses and 16 orders in curvatures spanned by the two types of black holes. Moreover, because of the particular masses of black holes in the current sample of gravitational-wave sources, the correlations imposed by the two experiments are aligned and of similar magnitudes when expressed in terms of the far field, post- Newtonian predictions of the metrics. If a future coalescing black-hole binary with two low-mass (e.g., 3M ) components is discovered, the degeneracy between the deviation parameters can be broken∼ by combining the inspiral constraints with those from the black-hole shadow measurements. I. INTRODUCTION vations [4{6], and cosmological tests [7] explore dynami- cal metrics. A different distinction between metric tests Over the past century, numerous predictions of the the- separates those that involve vacuum metrics from the ory of General Relativity (GR) have been tested against ones in which the coupling of matter with the gravita- multiple experiments and astrophysical observations [1]. tional field plays an important role. The latter category Even though all these investigations aim to test the same includes not only the cosmological tests, for which the theory, they nevertheless address different combinations feedback of matter to the gravitational field determines of its ingredients, different aspects of its predictions, and the evolution of structure formation, but also, e.g., tests are performed on widely different scales. A very stringent of scalar-field gravity with pulsars, in which the presence constraint imposed in one setting does not necessarily of matter in the strong gravitational fields of the neu- preclude the importance of testing different predictions trons stars gives rise to dipole radiation (which has not of the theory in a different setting. been observed) [8, 9]. At one level, it is common to distinguish gravitational Even though the breadth of gravitational tests explores tests between those that test Einstein's equivalence prin- many aspects of the underlying theory and its predic- ciple and those that test the field equation [1]. The for- tions, it is usually impossible to assess the relative sig- mer search for violations of the weak equivalence princi- nificance of any one particular upper limit on possible arXiv:2012.02117v1 [gr-qc] 3 Dec 2020 ple, of the local Lorentz invariance, and of the local po- deviations. This is true because there is no compelling sition invariance. The latter assume the validity of Ein- alternative to GR that is based on fundamental physics stein's equivalence principle and, therefore, that space- arguments and that leaves observable signatures at the time is endowed by a metric and that test particles and scales of most experiments. In other words, without a photons follow geodesics in this metric. These tests then plausible alternative to the theory to guide the tests and use observations to map the metric of an object and test our thinking, it is not viable to ask how large a deviation whether its parameters are consistent with GR predic- one would expect from any test. Moreover, it is impossi- tions. ble to guess at what scale would such deviations become Among metric tests, there is a critical distinc- observable. tion between those that measure parameters of time- For these reasons, a wide variety of gravitational independent metrics and those that probe the dynam- tests have been performed with objects and in settings ics of the theory. For example, all solar-system tests that probe a vast range of scales: from sub-mm length and many of the tests involving binary pulsars explore scales to the size of the observable Universe, from the equilibrium metrics [2], whereas gravitational-wave tests GM=Rc2 10−9 potentials [10] of terrestrial experi- with pulsar timing [3], direct gravitational-wave obser- ments to the∼ order-unity potentials of black holes, and 2 from the GM=R3c2 10−12 cm−2 curvature scales of galaxy [18]. Comparing the observed shadow size to that neutron stars to the ∼10−57 cm−2 curvature scale of the predicted for the mass of the black hole that was known cosmological constant∼ [11]. a priori from stellar dynamics has led to constraints on The differences in the qualitative character between the possible deviation of the black-hole spacetime from the gravitational tests, the observables used, and the the Kerr metric [19]. These constraints were expressed in tools employed hamper our ability to cross compare the terms of upper limits on parameters of metrics that have resulting constraints of any deviations from GR. If a spe- been designed to be different from Kerr, while ensuring cific modification to the GR field equations is considered, that no pathologies are present outside the horizons [20{ then the complete theory can be used to make predic- 23]. They were further translated into constraints on the tions for and be compared against all types of observa- post-Newtonian expansions of these metrics, in order to tions and astrophysical systems. However, translating compare them with earlier, weak-field tests. empirical constraints on general modifications from one A common denominator among many of these avenues setting to another poses serious challenges. For example, of testing GR with black holes or other stellar objects it is very hard to ask in a theory-independent way how is the set of constraints they impose on the equilib- the results of cosmological tests affect the predictions for rium metrics of objects with different compositions and the gravitational-wave emission from coalescing neutron masses. However, as discussed above, these constraints stars. Perhaps more importantly for the design of fu- are expressed in different ways that are specific to each ture experiments, it is often impossible to understand test because, e.g., they are merged with parameters that whether existing constraints on modifications from GR quantify the dynamics of the theory (as is the case of already preclude the detection of beyond-GR phenom- the gravitational-wave tests) or employ complexity that ena in a previously unexplored setting. is necessary to avoid pathologies (as is the case of the In recent years, a new set of gravitational tests has shadow tests). emerged that probe a previously unexplored regime: that The aim of this series of papers is to combine all ex- of the near-field regions of astrophysical black holes. The isting tests of metrics of astrophysical objects in order LIGO/Virgo detection of gravitational waves from coa- to test three important GR predictions for the metrics lescing black holes and neutron stars has led to tests of of black holes, i.e., that: (i) the metric of a black hole, the dynamics of GR with stellar-mass objects, during the expanded to first order in spin, is identical (when ex- inspiral and ringdown stages of the events [4{6][12]. The pressed in geometric units) to that of a slowly spinning constraints from gravitational-wave tests are typically ex- star, i.e., it is the Schwarzschild spacetime with the first- pressed in terms of upper limits on deviations from the order frame-dragging terms; (ii) all black holes, indepen- GR predictions on a set of parametric post-Newtonian dent of mass or curvature, are described by the same terms in the waveform expression. These terms amal- metric; and (iii) the black-hole spacetime is described by gamate both potential deviations in the metrics of the the Kerr metric. individual black holes from the Kerr solution (when they The approach we will follow here is to use the con- are at large distances) as well as potential deviations in straints that are imposed with each type of test and the strength, polarization, and angular distribution of calculate their implications for the values of the vari- the radiated gravitational waves, i.e., the dynamics of ous terms in a parametric post-Newtonian expansion of the theory. the equilibrium black-hole metrics. It is important to Moving to the larger masses and smaller curvatures of emphasize here that, in many cases involving black-hole the supermassive black holes in the centers of galaxies, tests, we will not be testing post-Newtonian expansions the monitoring of the orbits of stars within a few thou- of the metrics. Instead, we will be constraining the pa- sand Schwarzschild radii from the black hole in the center rameters for regular, well behaved metrics that deviate of the Milky Way, Sgr A*, has led to application of two from the GR predictions and then use these constraints classical GR tests to this black-hole environment: the to place bounds on deviations of the corresponding post- measurement of the gravitational redshift (which leads Newtonian parameters of these metrics.