A Pediatric Case with an Unstabilized Neck Treated with Skeletal Muscle Electrical Stimulation and KAATSU Training®

A Pediatric Case with an Unstabilized Neck Treated with Skeletal Muscle Electrical Stimulation and KAATSU Training®

CASE REPORT A pediatric case with an unstabilized neck treated with skeletal muscle electrical stimulation and KAATSU training® H. Iwashita Int. J. KAATSU Training Res. 2015; 11: 7-12 [Objectives] In recent years, a larger percentage of children qualify as physically or mentally challenged (challenged children, hereafter) and neck stabilization is a major issue in this population. We performed belt electrode skeletal muscle electrical stimulation (B-SES) in combination with KAATSU training, in a severely challenged child with lissencephaly to investigate treatment safety and how this might be effective in achieving neck stabilization. We present our results below. [Methods] A patient with lissencephaly was treated twice a week for 15 weeks with B-SES and KAATSU training on an outpatient basis. Using the growth and development stage and Ushijima’s (1996) neck stabilization evaluation criteria for children with Severe Motor and Intellectual Correspondence to: Disabilities, we assessed our patient based on recorded videos. H. Iwashita, [Results] In a challenged child with severe motor developmental delay who was unable to take part Komone Acupuncture Clinic, in voluntary training, upper body KAATSU training with B-SES led to increased muscle tone and 3-10-18 Mukaihara, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0036, improved neck stabilization. Japan [Conclusions] B-SES with KAATSU training may be an effective treatment for children with severe [email protected] physical and mental challenges who lack signs of neck stabilization. However, it will be necessary to study this treatment in a larger number of cases using more assessment methods in the future. See end of article for authors’ affiliations Key words: lissencephaly, neck stabilization, KAATSU training, skeletal muscle electrical stimulation INTRODUCTION about this treatment and confirmed that they gave Severely challenged children are defined as children their consent. who suffer a combination of severe mental and physical challenges. Rehabilitation in these severely 2. Case challenged children is difficult since spontaneous Patient: A 2 year-4 month-old boy. training is hard to establish and they will not be Diagnosis: Lissencephaly (broad gyrus), responsive to various instructions, etc. so that West syndrome compared to children with other types of challenges, Chief complaint: flaccid quadriplegia acquisition of training movements is difficult. Family history: no remarkable findings. Ordinarily in an infant, the neck stabilizes at around Past medical history: During pregnancy, there were no 4 months of age, and this provides the foundation particular abnormalities and the patient was delivered for further motor development. This factor is thought vaginally at 38 weeks 6 days weighing 2680 g. to often impact subsequent motor development History of present illness: (Kawaguchi et al., 2006). However, there are currently The patient had severe flaccid quadriplegia, spending no effective rehabilitation methods for those infants most of his life bedridden and was barely able to turn and children whose necks have not stabilized. We over on his own. He required full assistance for both instituted KAATSU training in a patient with meals and elimination. Mild joint contractures were lissencephaly and succeeded in achieving neck noted in both hands and feet and it was difficult for stabilization in a patient with flaccid quadriplegia, him to control his muscles. Although he could not and herein report our experience. understand or communicate through language, he was able to express his feelings through facial 1. Research-related concerns expressions. He was experiencing 5 to 10 epileptic This research was conducted with the consent of the seizures a day. patient’s primary physician, and before starting this study, we provided the parents with information 8 A pediatric case with an unstabilized neck treated with skeletal muscle electrical stimulation and KAATSU training® 3. Methods wrapped around the thorax-brachial-antebrachial/ a) Exercise conditions epigastric-lower abdominal areas. B-SES is an EMS KAATSU belts were wrapped around the uppermost device that allows musculature in all areas between areas of the axillary and femoral regions, and the the belts to be exercised as a substitute for active KAATSU master (KAATSU Japan CO., Ltd.) was exercise (Fig. 1). B-SES is characterized by exercising employed. Simultaneously, belt electrode -skeletal more muscles than traditional EMS and there is less muscle electrical stimulation (B-SES, Homer ion pain induced by electrical stimulation and thus it can Institute, Inc.) belts (Hamada et al., 2004) were be used in children without placing too much of a (a)Traction Response (b) Sitting tonic labyrinthine reflex Table 1. GMFM evaluation of KAATSU training, botulinum toxin therapy, and bilateral muscle release in the hip in our patient Bilateral muscle KAATSU training Botulinum toxin therapy release in the hip Before After 1 First Second Third (c) Spontaneous movement At the After 3 surgery mo start mo Before After 3 Before After 3 Before After 3 injection mo injection mo injection mo A: Lying and 41/51 51/51 43 43 45 50 50 50 45 51 rolling (80.0%) (100%) (84.3) (84.3) (88.2) (98.0) (98.0) (98.0) (88.2) (100) 28/60 36/60 11 20 20 26 26 29 20 29 B: Sitting (46.6) (60.0) (18.3) (33.3) (33.3) (43.3) (43.3) (48.3) (33.3) (48.3) C: Crawling and 5/42 8/42 0 3 3 7 7 6 3 9 kneeling (11.9) (19.0) (7.1) (7.1) (16.6) (16.6) (14.2) (7.1) (21.4) Fig.1. Before KAATSU training H. Iwashita 9 burden on them. Upper arm training was started at a common items to measure primarily spontaneous Base Standard KAATSU Units (SKU) pressure of 30- movement. Procedures and evaluation criteria are 40 SKU/ optimal pressure 60-70SKU. Since this shown in Table 1. The patient was evaluated, patient could not talk, we determined the appropriate compared, and investigated before the start of KAATSU pressure based on the color of the hands, pulse, and training and after 15 weeks of treatment. the child’s facial expressions. After deciding on the 2) Videos optimal pressure, pressurization and depressurization Cerebral palsy in severely challenged children leads was repeated 3 times, and after passive ROM training, to delays in motor development, maturation of B-SES was applied. B-SES intensity was the minimum sensation perception, and cognition, excess muscle intensity at which muscular contraction could be tone resulting in abnormalities in the posture tone, confirmed (11-15 mA), and this was continued for 10 and various other factors complicating the issue (Bax minutes. In addition, during training, we carefully et al., 2005). For this reason, the mechanism of action kept the patient under observation for any changes in is difficult to assess, so evaluating videos made it his physical state. During depressurization, we made possible to conduct a more comprehensive evaluation sure that his head was kept lower than the heart to and investigation. minimize any vagal reflex. Results b) Evaluation 1. Results of neck stabilization assessment in a 1) Evaluation of neck stabilization in a child with child with severe mental and psychological severe mental and physical challenges during challenges. development Results from our patient are shown in Table 2. If Evaluation was made in accordance with Ushijima’s we focused on changes in scores for each of the (1996) neck stabilization evaluation criteria for evaluation items, there were only minor increases of 1 children with Severe Motor and Intellectual to 2 points each, which made it seem as if not much Disabilities. Assessed items were traction response, had changed. However, we studied these evaluation tonic labyrinthine reflex while seated, and spontaneous criteria in further detail. First, looking at the traction movement on elbows. Although various kinds of tests response, the patient could not move his head at all are used to assess neck stabilization, we used the most and was described as, “no head lag was observed” Table 1. a: Traction Response b: Sitting tonic labyrinthine reflex c: Spontaneous movement on elbows Procedure Assessment criteria Child is placed in a supine position symmetrical on both Ⅰ.head lag not observed. sides. Trying to avoid touching the back of the child’s Ⅱ.traction response 45 degree head lag observed. a hands, touch the palms with thumbs and hold the wrists. Ⅲ.< 30 degree head lag observed. Then while calling out to the child, slowly pull the child up Ⅳ.head control observed. 90 degrees into a sitting position. Have the child sit with both sides aligned symmetrically Ⅰ.Head goes back and bring the trunk up into an upright position and observe Ⅱ.Head remains upright 1 or 2 times. b how well the child can maintain this position on his own. Ⅲ.Head remains upright more than 3 seconds. Ⅳ.Head remains upright more than 5 seconds. Ⅴ.Head remains upright more than 10 seconds. Have the child on his elbows and while drawing his Ⅰ.No response or movement. attention by calling, or using a toy or electronic sound, Ⅱ.Rotates laterally. record the response. See if he raises his head and measure Ⅲ.Raises head 1 or 2 times. c how long he can maintain this position. Ⅳ.Can raise head up and maintain position more than 3 seconds. Ⅴ.Can keep head up 15 seconds or longer. Table 2. Results of neck stabilization assessment Baseline After 15 weeks Traction Response 1 / 4 (25%) 2 / 4 (50%) Sitting tonic labyrinthine reflex 2 / 5 (40%) 4 / 5 (80%) Spontaneous movement 2 / 5 (40%) 4 / 5 (80%) Total 5 /14 (36%) 10/14 (71%) 10 A pediatric case with an unstabilized neck treated with skeletal muscle electrical stimulation and KAATSU training® before the start of treatment. After 15 weeks, “traction down and the patient could not move against gravity. response is observed with a 45º head lag” showing the After 15 weeks, however, the patient was able to resist patient was now able to move against gravity.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us