CPC(HEP & NP), 2009, 33(X): 1|7 Chinese Physics C Vol. 33, No. X, Xxx, 2009 Mass differences and neutron pairing in Ca, Sn and Pb isotopes B. S. Ishkhanov,1;2 S. V. Sidorov,1 T. Yu. Tretyakova,2;1) E. V. Vladimirova2 1 Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia 2Skobeltzyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia Abstract Various estimates of the even-odd effect of the mass shell of atomic nuclei are considered. Based on the experimental mass values of the Ca, Sn, and Pb isotopes, the dependence of the energy gap on the neutron number is traced and the relationship of this characteristic to the properties of external neutron subshells is shown. In nuclei with closed proton shells, effects directly related to neutron pairing and effects of nucleon shells are discussed. Key words nucleon interaction, models of atomic nuclei, nucleon pairing in atomic nuclei PACS 21.10.Dr, 21.30.Fe, 29.87.+g 1 Introduction ual interaction | an effective short-range interaction, which leads to an increase of the binding energy of a pair of nucleons when summation of their spins gives The creation of the shell model of the atomic nu- the total moment J = 0. The pairing of identical nu- cleus [1, 2] is one of the most significant achievements cleons makes it possible to explain many experimental of theoretical nuclear physics. The first attempts at facts, including the spin J P = 0+ of all even-even nu- its development were based on the model of atomic clei and the enhanced stability of even-even isotopes electron shells. The prospects for this approach were [3{5]. not that obvious, since there is a significant difference between the electrons in the atom and the nucleons in 2 Even-odd staggering and nucleon the atomic nucleus. In the case of an atom, the elec- pairing trons are in the strong Coulomb field of the atomic nucleus, and the interactions of electrons with one The increasing of stability of even-even nuclei another are a correction to the total potential (the leads to the stratification of the mass surface on three \screening" of the nuclear field by the electrons is arXiv:1705.08329v2 [nucl-th] 30 Jul 2017 components: one for even-even nuclei, one for odd- very important). In the case of an atomic nucleus, odd nuclei and one intermediate for nuclei with odd the total self-consistent field is the result of nucleon- mass number A. A systematic study of the binding nucleon interactions and effectively takes its proper- energies of a nucleus B(A) shows that for even-even ties into account. Accordingly, the total atomic nu- nuclei the following rule is fulfilled: cleus potential changes with transitions from isotope 1 to isotope. B(A) > [B(A+1)+B(A−1)]: (1) For a correct description of the properties of 2 atomic nuclei, in addition to changing the mean-field The observed even-odd mass staggering (EOS) has potential it is also necessary to take into account the been extensively explored in the literature [6{10]. residual interaction. This, in spite of its small value, The EOS effect is generally associated with the pair- is crucial in determining the specific properties of the ing gap ∆, as suggested by BCS theory. To estimate system of nucleons. In the first approximation, the its value various more or less averaged equations are so-called pairing forces are considered as the resid- used: three-, four- or five-point [4, 11{14] formulas 1) E-mail: [email protected] c 2017 Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd c 2009 Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd No. X 2 (so-called indicators): even-even nucleus and the doubled neutron separa- tion energy S (Z;N − 1) from the neighboring odd (−1)N n ∆(3)(N) = [S (N)−S (N +1)]; (2) nucleus (N −1;Z) [26]: n 2 n n N ∆nn(N) = S2n(N)−2Sn(N −1) = (4) (−1) ∆n (N) = [−Sn(N +1)+2Sn(N)−Sn(N −1)]; 4 = Sn(N)−Sn(N −1) = (5) (3) = 2∆(3)(N −1); (5) 1 (4) (4) n ∆n (N) = 2 [∆n (N)+∆n (N +1)] = (−1)N where S2n(N) = B(N) − B(N − 2). This definition = [3Sn(N +1)−3Sn(N)+ (4) 8 considers the nucleus as a core with a pair of external +S (N −1)−S (N +2)]; n n \valence" nucleons, and does not take into account where Sn(N) = B(N)−B(N −1) is the neutron sepa- how the mean-field potential changes when \valence" ration energy of a nucleus (N;Z). In the formulas (2 nucleons are added or removed. - 4) for neutron EOS, the proton number Z is fixed. It is known that the ∆nn(N) dependence for even- Similar formulas (here and below) for protons can even nuclei is much smoother, and it produces an EOS be obtained by fixing the neutron number N and re- estimate lower than that given by other formulas. placing N by Z. It is seen from the formulas above Also, unlike the others, this characteristic is dimin- that the expression (3) is also an averaging between ished for closed-shell nuclei, which corresponds to the (3) (3) ∆n (N) and ∆n (N −1). common expectation that the pairing at shell closure The relations (2) and (3) were originally obtained should decrease in connection with the level density in order to get an analytic dependence of EOS on A reduction. It can be expected that ∆nn(N) includes to introduce it as an additional pairing term to the the mean field contributions to the least extent, but it semi-empirical Bethe-Weizs¨acker mass surface for- is apparently impossible to completely exclude their (3) mula. From this point of view, the values of ∆n influence [8, 10]. In Ref. [20] it was noted that, as fluctuate much more strongly depending on A, but ∆nn(N) includes the second differences of the bind- the result of their approximation differs slightly from ing energies, its value may be non-zero even without (4) the results for ∆n [4]. So, the four-point formula EOS. (3) became the basis for describing the EOS effect, and consequently for describing the pairing effect, for 3 Seniority model a long time. In some modern calculations even more smoothing formulas are used, taking into account five With the pairing phenomena taken into account, [12, 13, 15] or six experimental binding energies of iso- the A-nucleon system Hamiltonian is: topes [11]. An increase of the number of isotopes does ^ ^ ^ not significantly affect the EOS calculation result, but H = H0 +Hpair; (6) ^ the expansion of the range of experimental data in the where H0 is the intrinsic singe-particle Hamiltonian, region far from stability can lead to the usage of ex- determined by the nucleus mean-field, and the resid- perimental data with significant errors. Modern mass ual interaction corresponds to the monopole pairing: formulae use more complicated pair approximations H^ = −GP^yP:^ (7) depending not only on power of A but also on isospin pair relations [17, 18]. The relationship between differ- Here G is the pairing strength parameter, and P^y ent variants of the EOS estimation, as well as various and P^ denote the pair creation and annihilation op- (4) variants of the ∆ (A) approximation for protons and erators. A rough experimental estimate gives Gn = neutrons, are considered in Refs. [10, 19{21]. 25=A MeV for neutrons and Gp = 17=A MeV for pro- Many studies are devoted to the evaluation of tons [3]. both the direct nucleon pairing contribution to the The seniority model [27, 28] is one of the simplest EOS and the contributions of other microscopic ef- models. It describes the filling of a shell with the fects [6, 8, 22{25]. It is shown [8, 23] that the best total angular momentum j over a closed core. Fol- estimation for identical nucleons pairing in the even lowing Ref. [8], let us consider n nucleons moving in N nucleus is the three-point indicator (2) for neigh- a 2Ω-fold degenerated shell (2Ω = 2j+1), described by (3) bor odd neutron number ∆n (N+1). This conclusion the Hamiltonian in Eq. (7). The energy eigenvalues corresponds to the direct determination of the two- in the seniority model can be expressed in terms of neutron pairing ∆nn(N) as the difference between the nucleon number n and seniority ν (the number of un- two-neutron separation energy S2n(Z;N) from the paired nucleons (quasiparticles) in the configuration No. X 3 considered): 25 d3/2 f7/2 p3/2 p1/2 a) 1 E(n;ν) = − G(n−ν)(2Ω−ν −n+2): (8) S 4 20 p The nuclear ground state has seniority ν = 0 for even ) 15 V nucleon number n (all nucleons are paired), and ν = 1 e M ( for odd number n. The value of EOS according to the S 10 formula for the three-point indicator (2) is: 5 ( Sn 1 GΩ+ 1 G for even n, ∆(3)(n) = 2 2 (9) τ 1 0 N 2 GΩ for odd n. 15 20 25 30 35 40 The index τ = n;p denotes the nucleon type.