Bugs & Drugs REFERENCES November 2018 GENERAL 1. Anon

Bugs & Drugs REFERENCES November 2018 GENERAL 1. Anon

Bugs & Drugs REFERENCES November 2018 GENERAL 1. Anon. Drugs for bacterial infections. Treatment Guidelines Med Lett 2010;8: 43-52. 2. Blondel-Hill E, Nigrin J. Guide to antimicrobial susceptibility testing & reporting. Dynacare Kasper Medical Laboratories/BC Children's Hospital. 2017. 3. Gattis WA. A selected review of antimicrobial concentrations within tissues of the bone, eye, and lung. Antimicrobics Infect Dis Newslett 1994;13:75-86. 4. Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM, eds. The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy 2017. Sperryville, VA: Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc. 2017. 5. Gorbach SL, Mensa J, Gatell JM. 1999 pocket book of antimicrobial therapy & prevention. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins1999. 6. Lovgren M, Talbot JA. Antimicrobial-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Can J Infect Dis 1999;10:27-9A. 7. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, and Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s principles & practice of infectious diseases. 7th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc. 2009. 8. Taketomo CK, Hodding JH, Kraus DM. Pediatric Dosage Handbook. 12th ed. 2005-06. 9. Yu VL, Merigan TC, Barriere SL, eds. Antimicrobial therapy and vaccines. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins 1999. ANTIMICROBIAL SPECTRUM OF ACTIVITY 1. Cho JC, Fiorenza MA, Estrada SJ. Ceftolozane/tazobactam: a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. Pharmacotherapy 2015;35:701-15. 2. Craig WA, Andes DR. In vivo activities of ceftolozane, a new cepahalosporin, with and without tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae, including strains with extended- spectrum β-lactamases, in the thighs of neutropenic mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57:1577-82. 3. Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, Sader HS, et al. Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with various resistance patterns isolated in U.S. hospitals (2011-2012). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57:6305-10. 4. Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM, eds. The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy 2018. Sperryville, VA: Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc. 2018. 5. Grayson ML, Crowe SM, McCarthy JS, et al, eds. Kucers’ the use of antibiotics 6th edition: A Clinical Review of Antibacterial, Antifungal and Antiviral Drugs. 2010 CRC Press, Boca Raton FL. 6. Scott LJ. Ceftolozane/tazobactam: a review in complicated intra- abdominal and urinary tract infections. Drugs 2016;76:231-42. 7. Solomkin J, Hershberger E, Miller B, et al. Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole for complicated intra-abdominal infections in an era of multidrug resistance: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cIAI). Clin Infect Dis 2015;60:1462-71. 8. Sucher AJ, Chahine EB, Cogan P, et al. Ceftolozane/tazobactam: a new cephalosporin and β-lactamase inhibitor combination. Ann Pharmacother 2015;49:1046-56. 9. Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, et al. Manual of clinical microbiology, 10th edition, 2011. Washington, DC: ASM Press 2011. 10. Wagenlehner FM, Umeh O, Steenbergen J, et al. Ceftolozane/ tazobactam compared with levofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary-tract infections, including pyelonephritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cUTI). Lancet 2015;385:1949-56. 11. Zhanel GG, Chung P, Adam H, et al. Ceftolozane/tazobactam: a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Drugs 2014;74:31- 51. PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ANTIMICROBIALS 1. Ambrose PG, Bhavnani SM, Rubino CM, et al. Pharmacokinetics- pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy: it’s not just for mice anymore. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:79-86. 2. Andes D. In vivo pharmacodynamics of antifungal drugs in treatment of candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:1179-86. 3. Andes D, vanOgtrop ML, Peng J, et al. In vivo pharmacodynamics of a new oxazolidinone (linezolid). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:3484-9. 4. Craig WA. Does the dose matter? Clin Infect Dis 2001;33(suppl 3):S233-7. 5. Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:1-12. 6. Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. Pharmacodynamic approaches to optimizing beta-lactam therapy. Crit Care Clin 2011;27:77-93. 7. Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM, eds. The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy 2012. Sperryville, VA: Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc. 2012. 8. Michalopoulos AS, Falagas ME. Colistin: recent data on pharmacodynamics properties and clinical efficacy in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care 2011;1:30-5. 9. Roberts JA, Lipman F. Pharmacokinetic issues for antibiotics in the critically ill patient. Crit Care Med 2009;37:840-51. 10. Wilby KJ, Nasr ZG, Elazzazy S, et al. A review of clinical outcomes associated with two meropenem dosing strategies. Drugs R D 2017;17:73-8. 11. Wispelway B. Clinical implications of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40(suppl 7):S439-47. EXTENDED INTERVAL AMINOGLYCOSIDE DOSING/MONITORING GUIDELINES 1. Ali MZ, Goetz MB. A meta-analysis of the relative efficacy and toxicity of single daily dosing versus multiple daily dosing of aminoglycosides. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:796-809. 2. Ariano RE. A critical evaluation of “once daily” aminoglycoside therapy. Health Sciences Centre Drug Info Bulletin 1993;15(6). 3. Bailey TC, Little JR, Littenberg B, et al. A meta-analysis of extended- interval dosing versus multiple daily dosing of aminoglycosides. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:786-95. 4. Bates RD, Nahata MC. Once-daily administration of aminoglycosides. Ann Pharmacother 1994;28:757-66. 5. Bertino JS, Rotschafer JC. Editorial response: single daily dosing of aminoglycosides-a concept whose time has not yet come. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:820-23. 6. Blaser J, Konig C, Simmen HP, et al. Monitoring serum concentrations for once-daily netilmicin dosing regimens. J Antimicrob Chemother 1994;33:341-8. 7. Conly JM, Gold W, Shafran SD. Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing: a new look at an old drug. Can J Infect Dis 1994;5:205-6. 8. Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Giotis ND, Baliatsa DV, et al. Extended- interval aminoglycoside administration for children: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2004;114:e111-8. 9. Craig WA. Once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides. Can J Infect Dis 1994;5:28C-33C. 10. Gilbert DN. Editorial response: meta-analyses are no longer required for determining the efficacy of single daily dosing of aminoglycosides. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:816-19. 11. Gilbert DN. Minireview: once-daily aminoglycoside therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991;35:399-405. 12. Hatala R, Dinh T, Cook DJ. Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing in immunocompetent adults: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:717-25. 13. Hatala R, Dinh TT, Cook DJ. Single daily dosing of aminoglycosides in immunocompromised adults: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:810-15. 14. Hemsworth S, Nunn AJ, Selwood K, et al. Once-daily netilmicin for neutropenic pyrexia in paediatric oncology. Acta Paediatr 2005;94:268-74. 15. Hitt CM, Klepser ME, Nightingale CH, et al. Pharmacoeconomic impact of once-daily aminoglycoside administration. Pharmacotherapy 1997;17:810-14. 16. Kirkpatrick CMJ, Duffull SB, Begg EJ. Once-daily aminoglycoside therapy: potential ototoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:879-80. 17. Knoderer CA, Everett JA, Buss WF. Clinical issues surrounding once- daily aminoglycoside dosing in children. Pharmacother 2003;23:44- 56. 18. Levison ME. New dosing regimens for aminoglycoside antibiotics. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:693-4. 19. Marra F, Partovi N, Jewesson P. Aminoglycoside administration as a single daily dose: an improvement to current practice or a repeat of previous errors? Drugs 1996;52:344-70. 20. Nicolau DP, Freeman CD, Belliveau PP, et al. Experience with a once-daily aminoglycoside program administered to 2,184 adult patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:650-5. 21. Prins JM, Buller HR, Kuijper EJ, et al. Once versus thrice daily gentamicin in patients with serious infections. Lancet 1993;341:335-9. 22. Smyth A, Tan KHV, Hyman-Taylor P, et al. Once versus three-times daily regimens of tobramycin treatment for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis - the TOPIC study: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:573-8.VandenBussche HL, Klepser MR. Editorial. Lancet 2005;365:547-8. 23. Sung L, Dupuis LL, Bliss B, et al. Randomized controlled trial of once- versus thrice-daily tobramycin in febrile neutropenic children undergoing stem cell transplantation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1869-77. 24. Tomlinson RJ, Ronghe M, Goodbourne C, et al. Once daily ceftriaxone and gentamicin for the treatment of febrile neutropenia. Arch Dis Child 1999;80:125-31. 25. Zaske DE. Aminoglycosides. In: Evans WE, Schentag JJ, Jusko WJ, eds. Applied pharmacokinetics: principles of therapeutic drug monitoring. Vancouver, WA: Therapeutics; 1992;14:1-47. VANCOMYCIN DOSING/MONITORING GUIDELINES 1. Ariano RE, Fine A, Sitar DS, et al. Adequacy of a vancomycin dosing regimen in patients receiving high-flux hemodialysis. Am J Kid Dis 2005;46:681-7. 2. Bauer LA. Applied Clinical Pharmacokinets. Chapter 5: Vancomycin. McGraw-Hill, 2001. 3. Brown M, Polisetty R, Gracely EJ, et al. Weight based loading of vancomycin in patients on hemodialysis. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:164- 6. 4. Edwards D, Pancorbo S. Routine monitoring of serum vancomycin concentrations: waiting for proof of its value. Clin Pharm 1987;6:652- 4. 5. Fekety R. Vancomycin and teicoplanin. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    173 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us