Thrissur DETAILS OF APPEAL (FLOOD – REBUILD) TALUK WISE Thrissur Taluk Whether included in Reason for Sl. No. Appeal No. Village Name Details of Order IKM List rejection (Yes / No) Appeal rejected and Chandrika 1 1697 Urakam Yes percentage decreased to Prabhakaran 30 - 59 No damage found 2 32/18 Urakam Shamsudheen V K Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found 3 31/18 Arattupuzha Nalinakshiyamma Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and 4 20/18 Urakam Mahadevan T R Yes changed to Complete Loss (>75%) No damage found 5 21/18 Urakam Viju T V Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found Kanakam 6 23/18 Urakam Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Sadanandan originally assessed No damage found Vijayalakshmi 7 110388/18 Ollur Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Lakshmanan originally assessed No damage found 8 28/18 Kurumbilavu Sajini Sunil Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found 9 21667 Veluthur Prema Paramel Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found Kochumon 10 108578/18 Kizhuppillikkara Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Chennangattu originally assessed Page 1 Thrissur No damage found 11 108604/18 Kizhuppillikkara Subrahmanian M C Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found 12 109869/18 Vadakkumuri Sathyavruthan Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found 13 106761/18 Chazhoor Indira Eroli Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found 14 111490/18 Ayyanthole Leela K S Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed Appeal rejected and 15 Kuttur Thanka Velayudhan Yes percentage decreased to 30 - 59 109783, No damage found 16 192/18, Madakkathara Chacko Paul Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what 130783 originally assessed Appeal allowed and 17 54/18 Cherppu Sudharama K C Yes percentage increased to 30 - 59 Appeal rejected and 18 98/18 Anthikkad Mohanan K N Yes percentage decreased to 30 - 59 Appeal allowed and 19 99/18 Anthikkad Ammini Pulikkal Yes changed to Complete Loss (>75%) Appeal rejected and 20 11486/18 Pananchery Valsala R Yes percentage decreased to upto 15 Appeal allowed and 95/18 21 Puthur Chandrika Kuttan Yes percentage increased to (121547) 30 - 59 Appeal allowed and Jayarajan M N 22 100/18 Thrissur Yes percentage increased to Vasudevan M N 60 - 74 Sankuru Valeparambil (H), Verification is 23 67/18 Manalur 5/339, Yes Old house demolished going on at RDO 9746630624, level Vellanthadam Road Page 2 Thrissur Amina, W/o Ibrahim, Verification is 24 66/18 Cherppu Churakkulam (H) leela Old house demolished going on at RDO 17/214, level 8086795436 Appeal allowed and Kumaran 25 Viyyur Yes changed to Complete Loss Kodakkattil (>75%) Appeal allowed and 26 172/18 Urakam Antony Chirayath Yes percentage increased to 60 - 74 No damage found Komalam 27 223/18 Urakam Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Kizhakkut originally assessed Appeal rejected and Kochupennu 28 331/18 Urakam Yes percentage decreased to Veliyath 16 - 29 Appeal allowed and Subrahmanian 29 281/18 Paralam Yes changed to Complete Loss Koduvalappil (>75%) No damage found 30 280/18 Paralam Mani Elayedath Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found Marathakavally 31 360/18 Pallippuram Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Chulliparambil originally assessed Appeal allowed and Radha 32 384/18 Venginissery Yes percentage increased to Cheerakodan 16 - 29 Appeal allowed and Velayudhan 33 239/18 Arattupuzha Yes percentage increased to (Sutha Kundur) 30 - 59 Valsala Appeal allowed and 34 230/18 Arattupuzha (Vinodkumar Yes percentage increased to Madappattu) 60 - 74 Appeal allowed and Ramachandran K S 35 338/18 Arattupuzha Yes changed to Complete Loss (Sarojini Koomully) (>75%) No damage found 36 179/18 Arattupuzha Lalitha K S Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and 37 167/18 Arattupuzha Saktheedharan K K Yes percentage increased to 16 -19 Appeal allowed and Bindu Rajeevan (K 38 216/18 Arattupuzha Yes percentage increased to K Koran) 30 - 59 Page 3 Thrissur Appeal allowed and Beevi, 39 4183/18 Oorakam Yes percentage increased to Vellaramparambu 60-74% No damage found Manikandan, 40 4343/18 Chazhur Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what Pathadath originally assessed No damage found 41 118117/18 Manalur Rappayi Devassy Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found 42 4095/18 Alappad Thanka Kochumon Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and Chakku (Jijo), 43 3952/18 Pallippuram Yes percentage increased to Chittattukaran 30-59% Appeal allowed and George (Alphonsa), 44 3953/18 Pallippuram Yes percentage increased to Chittattukaran 60-74% No damage found 45 4426/18 Edakkunni Raju T A Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found 46 4476/18 Peringavu Rajendran K C Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found 47 4277/18 Kizhakkumury Valliyamma Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what originally assessed Appeal allowed and 48 3999/18 Cherpu Thankamani K S Yes percentage increased to 30-59% No damage found Haridas K G 49 498/18 Alappad Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what (Sobhana) originally assessed No damage found 50 608/18 Alappad Vasanthi Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what originally assessed Page 4 Thrissur 499/18, 155/18, No damage found 51 367/18, Peechi Leela Raman Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what 3322/18(N originally assessed ) No damage found 500/18, 52 Peechi Jose V Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what 157/18 originally assessed Appeal allowed and 53 578/18 Peechi Aleyamma Yes percentage increased to 30-59% No damage found Mohanan, 54 952/18 Marathakkara Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what Puliyadan originally assessed No damage found Kochakkan, 55 951/18 Marathakkara Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what Puliyadan originally assessed No damage found Subhadra (Shabu), 56 1096/18 Avinissery Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what Kaippara originally assessed Chandran, Appeal allowed and 57 961/18 Puthur Mulangattuparambi Yes percentage increased to l 30-59% No damage found Vijaya 58 979/18 Kainoor Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Unnikrishnan originally assessed No damage found Malathi 59 977/18 Kainoor Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Unnichekkan originally assessed Appeal allowed and Chakki 60 592/18 Paralam Yes percentage increased to Puthenpurakkal 60-74% No damage found Kumaran K S, 61 591/18 Paralam Yes Appeal rrejected in excess of what Kundoor originally assessed No damage found Kali K C, 62 590/18 Paralam Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Koduvalappil originally assessed Page 5 Thrissur No damage found Latha Sunil, 63 583/18 Urakam Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Muttichur originally assessed Appeal allowed and 64 582/18 Alappad Vilasini Thalappully Yes percentage increased to 30 - 59% No damage found Velayudhan 65 577/18 Peramangalam Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Manakkalath originally assessed No damage found Viswambaran 66 490/18 Karamuck Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Vanneri (Vimala) originally assessed Rappai No damage found 67 488/18 Karamuck Chirayakandath Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what (Kuriakose) originally assessed Ramani T S, Appeal Allowed and 68 932/18 Kainoor Meppulithazhath H, Yes changed to fully damaged 9605814592 prakashan, Appeal Allowed and 69 285/18 marathakkara yes champulli house changed to fully damaged fathimakutti,periya Appeal Allowed and 70 1097/18 thrissur yes veettil H changed to fully damaged Appeal allowed and Haidrose,Panikkass 71 287/18 Thannyam Yes percentage increased to ery H 30-59% Appeal allowed and vijayakumari,menil 72 617/18 inchamudi yes percentage increased to akathu H 30-59% Mani.K.C,Kollinal No damage found 73 915/18 Kainoor H, 1/246, Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what 9446356552 originally assessed Radha Suresh,Kizhakkara No damage found 74 751/18 Puzhakkal H, 8/362B, Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what 9846204425, originally assessed 7559856026 No damage found 75 191/18 Karamuku Baiju,Karippayil H Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed Page 6 Thrissur No damage found Manitha(Sudheer 76 161/18 Manalur Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what kumar),Mampulli H originally assessed No damage found Nisha 77 180/18 Karamukku Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Rajesh,Kundayi H originally assessed No damage found Smitha(Sebastian T 78 153/18 Manalur Yes Appeal Rejected in excess of what P),Thalakkottukara originally assessed No damage found Santha,Menothpara 79 185/18 Manalur Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what mbil H originally assessed No damage found francis thomas 80 981/18 kainoor yes Appeal rejected in excess of what karalathukaran H originally assessed No damage found Banumathi, 81 982/18 kainoor Yes Appeal rejected in excess of what Kaattilaparambil H originally assessed No damage found sindhu k 82 994/18 marathakkara yes appeal rejected in excess of what r,kodippurathu H, originally assessed No damage found balan,padathupura 83 995/18 puthur yes appeal rejected in excess of what kkalH originally assessed sekeena abdul No damage found 84 540/18 chazoor rehiman,kodancher yes appeal rejected in excess of what y H originally assessed No damage found 85 458/18 pallipuram ayyappathu H yes appeal rejected in excess of what originally assessed No damage found rajan m 86 1100/18 marathakkara yes appeal rejected