Seaver Peters ʼ54 Dartmouth College Athletic Director, 1967-1983

Seaver Peters ʼ54 Dartmouth College Athletic Director, 1967-1983

Seaver Peters ʼ54 Dartmouth College Athletic Director, 1967-1983 An Interview Conducted by Dan Daily Hanover, NH May 23, 2001 DOH-44 Rauner Special Collections Library Dartmouth College Hanover, New Hampshire 1 Seaver Peters interview INTERVIEW: Seaver Peters INTERVIEWED BY: Daniel Daily PLACE: Hanover, New Hampshire DATE: May 23, 2001 DAILY: I'm speaking with Seaver Peters today, Class of 1954 and Athletic Director from 1967 to 1983. Mr. Peters, I wanted to start off . PETERS: "Seaver" or "Pete" is fine, by the way. DAILY: All right, Seaver. I'd like to start the interview today by hearing how you decided to come to Dartmouth. PETERS: OK. From Melrose, Mass.—I played hockey at Melrose— Dartmouth was always known as a very, very good hockey school (they dominated intercollegiate hockey for a period of time). My father went to Dartmouth, my brother went here as a part of the Navy V-6 or V-12 program. So I always liked Dartmouth because of family involvement and because of hockey. We had a very good high school hockey program; a lot of people from Melrose, Mass. came to Dartmouth and played hockey. And I applied here, [to] Clarkson—nope, nope—Colgate and St. Lawrence. [Edward J.] “Eddie”, "Jerry" Jeremiah [ʻ30], the then hockey coach, late, was in touch a couple of times, and the good fortune was I was accepted. It was that simple, and as a matter of fact a teammate of mine at Melrose High [John Titus]—we won the New Englands in high school in Melrose, and a teammate from Melrose and I came here, obviously the Class of '51—that was a pretty good class, as a matter of fact. So a combination of hockey, higher education—(I think hockey was probably the primary stimulus)—and I had a great four years here, a wonderful four years. I don't know whether you want me to go on or not, but . DAILY: Well, yes, that sounds good. Just to back up . so Coach Jeremiah recruited you. 2 Seaver Peters Interview PETERS: Yeah, and that's . DAILY: What was recruitment like in that time period? PETERS: Writing a couple of letters, really, maybe a phone call. It was that casual, relaxed, and he didn't have to do much with me. I could have gone to—I think I was accepted at St. Lawrence, I really can't remember. But—because Dartmouth was always number one, and Jerry was in touch a number of times, and our senior year at Melrose High we came up, our team came up, and played KUA [Kimball Union Academy] and the Dartmouth freshmen, and that was an important weekend for us. We happened to beat KUA and then—by a goal—three guys from that KUA team ended up at Dartmouth in the same class as I was—and then we beat the Dartmouth freshmen. They weren't a particularly good hockey team, didn't have a lot of talent. We beat them fairly easily, and I was fortunate enough to get a couple of goals, and that solidified my interest, and, I guess, Jerry's interest in my classmate, teammate, fraternity brother as it turns out, and myself, John Titus and myself. And so we were all set. We were lucky to get in, I think as I look back, but who knows? We didnʼt—how well I did in the Boards, I can't remember any of that, but it was just good fortune. I had decent—good grades in high school, but [it's] not nearly as competitive as it is now, by any means. My rationalization is that I would have been that much better educated today, but who knows? DAILY: Right. Yeah, I'd like to hear about your time here at Dartmouth, both playing hockey and as a student, kind of . PETERS: I played freshman hockey; freshmen were not eligible. It was a good freshman hockey team; [I remember] that we were undefeated. The varsity was good, and we thought we were better than they were, which we weren't by a long shot. If we ever had freshman eligibility, which they now have, I don't know as I ever would have been good enough to play. The transition year as a freshman hockey player was very, very important. We had a great group of guys and we thought we were going to tear up the college ranks in the years ahead, but we had a wonderful, wonderful freshman year. Davis Rink was the facility at that point; it was indoor natural ice, before the artificial ice came. So you had some days that you couldn't play. But it was a great year, and frankly, after the season 3 Seaver Peters Interview I remember going down to the rink because still the ice remained in there, and practiced quite a bit myself because I was worried whether I could make the varsity. Also freshman year I got very involved in intramural athletics, which was a lot of fun for me. So that was my chief involvement in athletics as a freshman, indeed as an upperclassman. I played three years of hockey, varsity hockey; we were terrible our first year (I think we won four games); then we won ten games, then we were 16 and 14 my senior year. Never quite as good as we thought we were going to be, but it was a wonderful experience. Jerry had—Jeremiah, Eddie Jeremiah, had a tough time at that point. His wife was ill and dying, and he became ill, but I guess— well, his wife was ill and it was a tough period for Jerry. He was a wonderful hockey coach and a wonderful person, but a tough period for him. I think I'm wrong when I say he was ill. He was ill when I came back here to work, not while I was an undergraduate. But it was a wonderful four years. Again, intramurals: I went and joined the then hockey fraternity. Phi Gam [Phi Gamma Delta] had the hockey captain for God knows how many years in a row, and we were all in that house, and never much feeling or allegiance to the national. More a feeling of allegiance to a great bunch of guys. I regret what's—[. an aside . .] what's now happening to fraternities, but I think they brought it on themselves. We used to hire a guy full time to make our beds, be a janitor, clean up, all that kind of thing, and they don't do that. I mean, Fraternity Row is a pigpen. You walk, drive up there— they've brought it on themselves, they've really an awful mess. But we had a lot of fun there. But back to our undergraduate days, it was—I remember we won the College foot—touch—two-hand touch football championship, played softball, and intramurals were as much fun as intercollegiate athletics. A great program, and we thoroughly enjoyed it. And senior year I was fortunate enough to be elected captain, and that was a rewarding experience as well. Also an undergraduate, what, Sphinx Senior Society—not a great student, but frankly we had comprehensive examinations then, on the academic side. I was an economics major, and I found comprehensive examinations a challenge and a really wonderful culmination; it brought everything together—I don't know how many courses; we took ten courses in economics or something, but people—I studied 4 Seaver Peters Interview for them, did reasonably well at them but not well enough to get honors or what have you. But it was great. And after the—oh, I also ought to—this is more personal than anything else—as a sophomore we all panicked and joined the R.O.T.C. That was the time of the—what, Korean War? DAILY: Yeah. PETERS: Well, as a matter of fact [David "Dave"] McLaughlin ʻ54, we were all—most of us were in Air Force R.O.T.C. So when we graduated I went in the service as a budget and accounting officer in the Air Force, two years overseas. And I say "overseas," it was in Cape Cod. Otis Air Force Base, over the canal, so that was about it. And obviously we got commission, I could pay back all my college loans and it was a wonderful two years. DAILY: I was wondering how you ended up in the Air Force. PETERS: Right. Oh, a ton of us joined. And a couple of my classmates— maybe me, but I don't think so—but a couple of my classmates owe their degree to the Air Science courses we could take, because they were guts. Oh, yeah. I mean, captains and majors in the Air Force were assigned up here to teach them, and . DAILY: They weren't tough? PETERS: No, not by a long shot! Not by a long shot. DAILY: Do any professors stand out as favorites? PETERS: Yeah. Let's see. One—one was a correspondent for the Boston Globe here. Last name was Kelly, I can't think of his first name [Eric]. The very best professor I had was in Russian history, Professor [John] Adams—I can't think of any more than that, but he was terrific, absolutely great. Economics, I'd say there were—just there like Clyde Dankert. And I loved the G.I. course, the Great Issues course. I mean, it was fabulous as a senior. I don't know whether you know anything about it, but John Dickey brought that in.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    46 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us