Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents WEEK 1 – INTRODUCTION TO THE UNIT – WHY CONFLICT OF LAWS IS CENTRAL TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW? IMPLICATIONS OF THE INTERNET, IN PERSONAM JURISIDCTION. ......... 7 Chapter 3 – Jurisdiction in personam ..................................................................................................................... 8 Distillers Co. (Bio-Chemicals) Ltd v Thomspon [1971] AC 458. .................................................................................. 11 WEEK 2 – INTERLOCUTORY RELIEF, FREEZING ORDERS AND INJUNCTIONS ........................... 13 Interlocutory relief ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 PT Bayan Resources and BCBC Singapore [2015] HCA 36 ........................................................................................... 15 INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS ............................................................................................................................ 16 Google v Equustek Solutions, 2017 SCC 34 .......................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 5 – Federal Jurisdiction ............................................................................................................................. 18 Diversity Jurisdiction ................................................................................................................................................... 18 WEEK 3 – CROSS-VESTING AND FORUM SLECTION AGREEENTS .................................................. 20 Cross-vesting ................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Re Wakim: Ex Parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511 ......................................................................................................... 21 Surviving Aspects of Cross-Vested Jurisdiction ............................................................................................... 21 How a transfer is made ............................................................................................................................................... 22 Cross-vesting and exclusive forum clauses ........................................................................................................ 23 Choice of law in cross-vested matters .................................................................................................................. 24 Gleeson v Bank of Queensland [2017] FCA 1302. ............................................................................................................. 24 Whitelum v Sisters of Mercy [2018] NSWSC 51 ................................................................................................................ 25 Capilano honey v Mulvany [2018] NSWSC 767 ................................................................................................................. 25 Forum selection agreements – chapter 7 ............................................................................................................ 26 Oceanic Sun Line v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197 ..................................................................................................................... 26 Mandatory Forum law ................................................................................................................................................. 27 7.49 Donohue v Armco [2002] 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 27 Armacel v Smurfit (2008) 248 ALR 573 ............................................................................................................................... 27 Ellinger v Guiness, Mahon [1939] 4 All ER 16 .................................................................................................................... 27 Commercial versus individual ................................................................................................................................. 28 Martinez v Bloomberg, 740 F.3d 211 (2d Cir 2014) ....................................................................................................... 28 WEEK 4 – FORUM NON CONVENIENS – RESTRAINT OF LOCAL PROCEEDNGS .......................... 29 Gleeson v Kong [2018] NSWSC 1275. .................................................................................................................................... 29 Update to Google v Aquustek ................................................................................................................................... 29 Forum non conveniens ............................................................................................................................................... 30 British test for FNC ....................................................................................................................................................... 31 Spiliada Maritime v Consulex [1987] 1 AC 436 [HL] ....................................................................................................... 31 Owusu v Jackson [2005] E.C.R. I-1383 .................................................................................................................................. 32 FNC – Australian style ................................................................................................................................................. 33 Oceanic Sun Line Shipping v fay (1988) 165 CLR 197 ................................................................................................... 33 Voth v Manildra Flour Mills (1990) 171 CLR 538. ........................................................................................................... 34 Dow Jones v Gutnick (2002) 194 ALR 433. ......................................................................................................................... 34 Garsec v Sultan of Brunei (2008) 250 ALR 682 ................................................................................................................ 35 Foreign law ....................................................................................................................................................................... 35 El Kharouf v El Khaurof [2004] NSWSC 187 ...................................................................................................................... 35 Lis alibi pendens – proceedings pending elsewhere ....................................................................................... 36 Related proceedings ..................................................................................................................................................... 36 TS Production v Drew Pictures (2008) 172 FCR 433 ...................................................................................................... 36 Anchoring effect of local law .................................................................................................................................... 36 FNC - Canada ................................................................................................................................................................... 37 FNC – American Style ................................................................................................................................................... 37 Gulf Oil Corp v Gilbert, 330 US 501 (1947) ......................................................................................................................... 37 Koster v Lumbermens Mutual, 330 US 518 (1947) .......................................................................................................... 38 Piper Aircraft Co v Reyno, 454 US 235 (1981) .................................................................................................................. 38 Montgomery v oberti 945 F.Supp.2d 1367 (SD Fl 2013) ............................................................................................. 38 Atlantic Marine v US district Court 134 S.Ct 568 (2013) .............................................................................................. 39 Haaretz.com v goldhar, 2018 scc 28 ...................................................................................................................................... 39 WEEK 5 - RESTRAINT OF FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS: ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS ......................... 40 1 Anti-Suit Injunctions .................................................................................................................................................... 40 Societe National Industrielle v Lee Kui Jak [1987] 1 AC 871 [HL] ............................................................................. 42 CSR Ltd v Cigna (1997) 189 CLR 345 .................................................................................................................................... 42 Allstate Life Insurance v ANZ Bank (1996) 64 FCR 55 ................................................................................................... 42 Pathway Investments v NAB [2012] VSC 495 .................................................................................................................... 43 1. Injunctions to Protect Jurisdiction and Processes of the Court ...........................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us