ITS2 Metabarcoding Analysis Complements Lichen Mycobiome Diversity Data

ITS2 Metabarcoding Analysis Complements Lichen Mycobiome Diversity Data

Mycological Progress (2018) 17:1049–1066 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1415-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE ITS2 metabarcoding analysis complements lichen mycobiome diversity data Elisa Banchi1 & David Stankovic1,2 & Fernando Fernández-Mendoza3 & Fabrizia Gionechetti1 & Alberto Pallavicini1 & Lucia Muggia 1,3 Received: 9 April 2018 /Revised: 12 May 2018 /Accepted: 4 June 2018 /Published online: 22 June 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Lichen thalli harbor complex fungal communities (mycobiomes) of species with divergent trophic and ecological strategies. The complexity and diversity of lichen mycobiomes are still largely unknown, despite surveys combining culture-based methods and high-throughput sequencing (HTS). The results of such surveys are strongly influenced by the barcode locus chosen, its sensitivity in discriminating taxa, and the depth to which public sequence repositories cover the phylogenetic spectrum of fungi. Here, we use HTS of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) to assess the taxonomic composition and diversity of a well- characterized, alpine rock lichen community that includes thalli symptomatically infected by lichenicolous fungi as well as asymptomatic thalli. Taxa belonging to the order Chaetothyriales are the major components of the observed lichen mycobiomes. We predict sequences representative of lichenicolous fungi characterized morphologically and assess their asymptomatic pres- ence in lichen thalli. We demonstrated the limitations of metabarcoding in fungi and show how the estimation of species diversity widely differs when ITS1 or ITS2 are used as barcode, and particularly biases the detection of Basidiomycota. The complemen- tary analysis of both ITS1 and ITS2 loci is therefore required to reliably estimate the diversity of lichen mycobiomes. Keywords Ascomycetes . Basidiomycetes . Endophytes . Fungal isolates . Ion torrent . ITS1 Introduction context in which lichens act as microhabitats where multiple fungi (representing diverse classes of Dikarya), algae, and bac- The traditional view of lichens as mutualistic, symbiotic asso- teria coexist and likely contribute to the functions of the sym- ciations between one fungus, the mycobiont, and a population biotic system as a whole (Arnold et al. 2009; Grube et al. 2009; of algae, the photobionts (Hawksworth and Honegger 1994), Muggia and Grube 2010;U’Ren et al. 2012; Grube et al. 2015; has been reviewed in a more comprehensive and integrative Spribille et al. 2016;Moyaetal.2017). The high diversity of lichen-associated fungi, and the fact that many species are found in different hosts and habitats, suggested that lichens Section Editor: Gerhard Rambold act as Bcradles of symbiotrophic fungal diversification^ Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (Harutyunyan et al. 2008;Arnoldetal.2009;U’Ren et al. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1415-4) contains supplementary 2010, 2012). Recently, the diversity of lichen-associated fungi, material, which is available to authorized users. hereafter referred to as lichen mycobiomes, has been empha- sized by both culture-based methods and high-throughput * Lucia Muggia amplicon sequencing techniques (U’Ren et al. 2010, 2012; [email protected]; [email protected] Muggia et al. 2016; Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017). 1 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via Giorgieri 10, Multiple ecological guilds of fungi can be found growing 34127 Trieste, Italy associated with lichen thalli (Arnold et al. 2009; Bates et al. 2 National Institute of Biology, Marine Biology Station, Fornače41, 2012; Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017). One group of lichen- 6330 Piran, Slovenia associated taxa is readily recognizable by their phenotypic 3 Institute of Plant Sciences, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, characters and the conspicuous symptoms of infection shown Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria by their hosts. Such taxa have long been referred to as 1050 Mycol Progress (2018) 17:1049–1066 lichenicolous fungi (Hawksworth 1979, 1981; Lawrey and the two spacers are prone to preferential amplification at dif- Diederich 2003, 2016; Hafellner 2015). While the symptom- ferent levels (Nilsson et al. 2009; Mello et al. 2011; Bellemain atic occurrence of lichenicolous fungi is restricted to a few et al. 2013; Bazzicalupo et al. 2013; Monard et al. 2013). lichen hosts, we have recently observed that some Basidiomycetes have on average longer amplicon sequences lichenicolous fungi are present in other lichens without pro- for the ITS2, and since the shorter sequences are preferentially ducing visible symptoms (Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017). A sequenced with high-throughput sequencing (HTS), the use of second component of the lichen mycobiome is formed by ITS2 would favor the detection of ascomycetes (Bellemain et species that cannot be detected morphologically, but are wide- al. 2013). On the other hand, ITS1 often contains an intron that ly present within lichen thalli and are abundantly isolated extends its sequence at the 5′-end (Martin and Rygiewicz using culture methods (Petrini et al. 1990;Girlandaetal. 2015), thereby promoting an over-representation of those se- 1997; Harutyunyan et al. 2008;Muggiaetal.2016). These quences that lack the intron (Bazzicalupo et al. 2013). Because fungi have been collectively termed endolichenic fungi due to ITS2 is more frequently represented in public databases, has a their relatedness to plant endophytes (Arnold et al. 2009); higher number of available sequences, and offers a better tax- many others are also related to plant pathogens and rock- onomic resolution, it has been proposed as the better choice inhabiting fungi (RIF; Selbmann et al. 2015;Muggiaetal. for parallel sequencing (Nilsson et al. 2009). In some cases, 2016). Finally, a third component is represented by extraneous however, no substantial differences between ITS1 and ITS2 fungi or fungal propagules found upon or incorporated within were recovered (Blaalid et al. 2013; Badotti et al. 2017). lichen thalli without playing any definite ecological role in the Finally, there are numerous studies that consider a single spac- lichen community (Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017). This er, either the ITS1 or ITS2 (Bellemain et al. 2013; Langarica- third component can be derived from other lichen mycobionts Fuentes et al. 2014; U'Ren et al. 2014; Miller et al. 2016; present in the community under focus, or from fungi known Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017). from different niches. Lichens may act in this way as complex As fungal metabarcoding studies have used different HTS banks of spores and mycelia and would function as subopti- platforms (see Cuadros-Orellana et al. 2013 for a review), mal habitats or reservoirs where the regeneration of local fun- different bioinformatic pipelines have been proposed (White gal communities can be potentially boosted (Fernández- et al. 2013; Bálint et al. 2014; Gweon et al. 2015). These have Mendoza et al. 2017). In this regard, lichen thalli may serve been developed based on experience gained from data analy- as refuges where such fungi can remain in an immature state ses of prokaryote datasets (Hibbett 2016). However, no stan- until an opportunity arises to occupy more favorable habitats dard procedure has been established so far for fungal sequence (Muggia et al. 2010; Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017). data. The analyses seem strongly dependent on the working The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region has been se- hypotheses of each study and on the type of sequence at hand. lected as formal DNA barcode for fungi due to its high inter- As the majority of studies target fungal communities to un- specific variability, conserved primer sites and presence in cover unknown diversity, an important and ongoing problem multiple copies (Blaalid et al. 2013;Schochetal.2012). Its is the definition of those sequences lacking an assigned tax- length, up to 800 base pairs (bp), is suitable for traditional onomy (Nilsson et al. 2016). For this reason, many sequences (Sanger) DNA barcoding, but exceeds the read length required still remain identified as Buncultured fungus.^ In addition, by most second-generation sequencing platforms for DNA many fungi have not yet been sequenced and cannot offer metabarcoding, which averages 200–400 bp. For this reason, reference sequences for ongoing studies (Hibbett 2016). only one of the two spacers, either ITS1 or ITS2, has been Both cases emerge as main issues in investigations of lichen sequenced so far. Even though diversity studies using these mycobiome(s) where unidentified fungi represent the largest new technologies have become more and more common in the proportion. last years (Bellemain et al. 2013; Abdelfattah et al. 2015; Previous studies processed high-throughput amplicon se- Miller et al. 2016), it is still debated whether ITS1 or ITS2 quencing data from lichens, considering thalli of different has the best taxonomic resolution. growth forms and others infected by symptomatic Few studies have dealt with the taxonomic resolution ob- lichenicolous fungi (Bates et al. 2012;U’Ren et al. 2012, tained using both the ITS1 and the ITS2 barcodes on the same 2014; Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017). These studies demon- dataset (Mello et al. 2011; Blaalid et al. 2013; Bazzicalupo et strated that lichens and their mycobiomes are suitable subjects al. 2013;Monardetal.2013;Orgiazzietal.2013). They have for implementing bioinformatic analyses of fungal been carried out on both Ascomycota (Nilsson et al. 2009; metabarcoding. Nonetheless, individual

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us