What do we talk about when we speak of cosmological redshift? Gabriel R. Bengochea1, ∗ 1Instituto de Astronom´ıa y F´ısica del Espacio (IAFE), CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires, (1428) Buenos Aires, Argentina From the first observations made by Slipher, our understanding and interpretation of the cosmo- logical redshift was evolving until reaching the current consensus, through the expanding universe and the emergence of modern physical cosmology within the framework of General Relativity. The redshift is one of the most basic concepts of astronomy, and is one of the few observational pa- rameters that can be measured directly. To refer to the temporal evolution of objects or cosmic structures in the universe, we often do so indistinctly through cosmic time or cosmological redshift. But repeatedly this connection ends up generating confusion not only among popular science com- municators but also within the professional astronomical community. In this article, we will make a pedagogical approach to the link between cosmic time and cosmological redshift, and we will also clarify several common misunderstandings around this relation. I. INTRODUCTION However, there was still no clear relation between redshift and distance. Until Hubble discovered Cepheid variable The Big Bang is our best model about how we think the stars in the Andromeda nebula [13], it was only possible universe works, and the discovery that distant galaxies to infer relative distances. Cepheids allowed Hubble to have recession velocities proportional to their distances estimate a true distance to Andromeda. Since then, we is the cornerstone of modern cosmology. Cosmological also know that those nebulae are actually galaxies more redshifts are now well understood within the framework or less similar to ours, the Milky Way. of Einstein's theory of General Relativity [1]. However, In the times of Lema^ıtre and Hubble, redshifts (and there are still misunderstandings about the concepts of blueshifts) were interpreted as a Doppler effect. In expansion and redshift, not only among popular science Doppler effects, redshifts are a consequence of velocities communicators but also within the professional astro- involved between sources and observers. First Lema^ıtre nomical community [2{7]. Sometimes, when the expan- [14], and then Hubble [15], obtained velocities of a few sion of the universe is involved, misinterpreted state- galaxies by using a linear velocity-distance law. In par- ments concerning redshift arise. ticular, Hubble took the radial velocities for 24 galaxies Being a fundamental observational parameter that can with 'known' distances and fitted them to certain relation be obtained directly with a measuring instrument, the (now known as the Hubble law), obtaining a high value redshift (denoted by z) is one of the most basic con- (similar to that of Lema^ıtrein 1927) for what we now cepts of astronomy. The observation and recording of call the Hubble constant. By the early 1930s, Hubble the spectral lines in galaxies undoubtedly reveal this phe- had measured redshifts z ' 0:02, and then a linear rela- nomenon. tion between redshift and distance was becoming clearer. The absorption lines in the spectrum of a galaxy can The conclusion was (a little later) that the universe is be used to obtain information about chemical elements expanding. present in that galaxy. Each chemical element generates Theorists almost immediately realized that these ob- a different pattern of absorption lines in the spectrum, servations could be explained by redshifts that appear at wavelengths that can be measured extremely reliably in certain cosmological solutions to Einstein equations of by spectrographs. When we identify some lines of spe- General Relativity. cific chemical elements in the spectra of the galaxies, and In a recent work [16], the authors describe some inter- compare them with the lines of spectra in experiments pretations of the Hubble law and it is remembered that carried out in a laboratory, we unequivocally find that the first suggestion for a cosmological redshift was from the patterns of the spectra of the galaxies are the same, W. de Sitter, as part of a static solution of Einstein equa- arXiv:1802.02444v2 [astro-ph.CO] 10 Feb 2018 but they are shifted with respect to those of the terres- tions [17{19]. In fact, in [20] Eddington mentioned that, trial laboratory. The most spectra are displaced towards within the de Sitter model, the displacement of spectral the red color, and therefore we refer to this phenomenon lines observed could be explained by a slowing down of as redshift. atomic vibrations, and that it would be wrongly inter- The first records of redshifts in galaxies were obtained preted as a motion of recession. Hubble himself in his by the astronomer Slipher [8{10]. Later, Wirtz and renowned work [15] writes that a possible explanation Lundmark (e.g. [11, 12]) mention the existence of spiral for the distance-redshift law could be due to the de Sit- nebulae whose redshifts seemed to increase with distance. ter effect. Humason [21] is another author who mentions that Hubble's observational results could have something to do with the de Sitter effect. Adopting Einstein's Cosmological Principle, that is, ∗ [email protected] under the assumption of isotropy and spatial homogene- 2 ity on large scales, Friedmann, Lema^ıtre,Robertson and velocities are not directly observable, therefore, we have Walker (FLRW) found solutions to Einstein field equa- never directly measured recession velocities. Apart from tions that contemplate expanding universes [14, 22{25]. redshift, for almost everything else one must adopt a the- Our modern cosmology is based on these FLRW models, ory of gravity, a cosmology with certain cosmological pa- and these solutions could be used to give a more elab- rameters, and then do the calculations to obtain recession orated theoretical sustenance to the ideas and observa- velocities, the age of the universe, and other magnitudes tions of the pioneer astronomers. In fact, today we think of interest . that the most correct interpretation of redshift is that Because of the univocal relationship between redshift which involves an expanding universe and not through z and time t in Eq. (2), we often speak of events happen- a Doppler effect, as originally thought by astronomers ing at a given redshift instead of at a given time. This is such as Slipher, Lundmark and Hubble when they used convenient because the redshift is observable and usually the equation V = cz to calculate velocities.1 has a great effect on the rates of physical processes. For Within the General Relativity framework, the cosmo- instance, we mean that the universe would have started logical redshifts arise since the proper distances between to accelerate at, say, z ' 0:6, or that the decoupling of comoving objects increase with time. But then, the ve- matter and radiation took place at z ' 1100, when the locities generated are dominantly due to the expansion universe was very young. Misinterpretations appear in of space, determined by the cosmological model chosen other circumstances, when one needs to be more specific to describe the universe, and not due to peculiar (lo- about what z and t one is referring to in that relation. cal) velocities through space. In addition, as we con- Surprisingly, many people think that an object that we sider increasingly distant objects, peculiar velocities of observe today at a given z, at an earlier time of its evo- distant galaxies becomes negligible with respect to the lution the same object was in a very (higher) different velocity of expansion of the universe at the location of z.2 such a galaxy. Therefore, although some popular litera- We usually see numerical simulations of stellar objects ture often uses the expression 'Doppler redshift' instead or about large scale structures of the universe, where we of cosmological redshift, it cannot be calculated with the are shown snapshots labeled with different values of cos- Doppler equation, as already explained by various au- mological redshift. Clearly, an univocal association is thors [2{4, 6, 27{29]. suggested, through the relation (2), with specific times Redshift z is generally defined as the change registered for the formation and the temporal evolution of the struc- between the frequency that light had at the time of emis- ture shown in such simulations. But then, it is usual for sion from an object, νem, and the frequency observed to- many people to interpret that these simulations are show- day in a detector, νobs. Now, we know that considering ing the same object passing through different redshifts a light ray coming to us from a distant galaxy along the throughout its evolution, and that this is what happens radial direction, and traveling through a null geodesic of in the real universe, according to our expanding universe the FLRW metric, by a simple cinematic analysis we find paradigm in the framework of General Relativity. that the light in its journey must change its frequency. When we read about a supermassive black hole being In this manner, the cosmological redshift z turns out to detected in a quasar at z = 7:54, adopting the current be the quotient between the value of the scale factor of concordance cosmology [33], it is mentioned then that the the universe today a0 and that corresponding to the time quasar is situated at a cosmic age of just tage = 690 Myr t of the emission a(t) [30]. This is, after the Big Bang [34]. But what do we mean when we mentioned that at redshift z the age of the universe νem a0 1 + z ≡ = (1) was tage? Only the objects that we see today with that νobs a(t) specific z were situated at a cosmic age of tage? The Then, differentiating Eq.