Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Podiceps auritus (Horned Grebe) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 4 Sources of reported national population data p. 7 Species factsheet bibliography p. 11 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Podiceps auritus (Horned Grebe) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Estonia 200-300 3 2008-2012 poor 0 0-10 2001-2012 poor - 20-50 1980-2012 poor P. a. auritus, North-east Europe (small-billed) Finland 1,500-3,300 29 2006-2012 good - 25-67 2001-2012 good - 29-63 1986-2012 good P. a. auritus, North-east Europe (small-billed) Germany 0 <1 2005-2009 good - 100 1985-2003 medium P. a. auritus, North-east Europe (small-billed) Iceland 700 9 2005 good + 10-29 2006- good + 30-50 2005-2011 medium Latvia 5-20 <1 2012 medium ? - 90-98 1994-2012 medium P. a. auritus, North-east Europe (small-billed) Lithuania 5-20 <1 2008-2012 medium + 400-1900 2001-2012 medium + 400-1900 1980-2012 medium P. a. auritus, North-east Europe (small-billed) Norway 750-850 10 2007 medium - 15-50 2003-2007 poor F 0 1980-2007 poor Russia ≥1,500- 20 2000-2004 poor ? - 10-40 1980-2012 medium Sweden 1,700-2,400 27 2008-2012 good + 50-100 2001-2012 medium - 5-35 1980-2012 medium P. a. auritus, North-east Europe (small-billed) Sweden 50-100 1 2008-2012 good + 0-100 2001-2012 poor + 0-200 1980-2012 medium P. a. auritus, North-west Europe (large-billed) Ukraine 0-5 <1 2000 medium F 10-20 1998-2010 medium F 20-50 1980-2010 medium United Kingdom 30 <1 2006-2010 good - 47 1996-2008 good - 56 1980-2008 good P. a. auritus, North-west Europe (large-billed) EU27 3,500-6,200 66 Decreasing Europe 6,400-9,200 100 Decreasing 1 See 'Sources' at end of factsheet, and for more details on individual EU Member State reports, see the Article 12 reporting portal at http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/article12/report. 2 The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 In the few cases where population size estimates were reported in units other than those specified, they were converted to the correct units using standard correction factors. 4 The robustness of regional trends to the effects of any missing or incomplete data was tested using plausible scenarios, based on other sources of information, including any other reported information, recent national Red Lists, scientific literature, other publications and consultation with relevant experts. 5 Trend directions are reported as: increasing (+); decreasing (-); stable (0); fluctuating (F); or unknown (?). 6 Trend magnitudes are rounded to the nearest integer. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Podiceps auritus (Horned Grebe) Table 2. Reported national wintering population sizes and trends in Europe1. Note that some countries within the species' wintering range did not report any data, and that only minimum totals are presented, to avoid double-counting of birds moving between countries. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (individuals)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Albania 5-25 <1 2002-2012 good F 30-60 2002-2012 good - 20-40 1980-2012 poor Armenia Present <1 2003-2013 ? ? Austria 1-2 <1 2008-2010 good 0 0 2001-2012 good 0 0 1980-2012 good Azerbaijan 10-100 1 1996-2002 medium ? ? Bulgaria 0-2 <1 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2000-2012 medium 0 0 1980-2012 medium France 382 9 2008-2012 good F 0 2000-2012 good F 0 1980-2012 medium Georgia Present <1 2012 ? ? Germany 1,100 27 2000-2005 good + 11-100 2000-2012 medium 0 0 1980-2005 poor Iceland Present <1 2012 ? ? Rep. Ireland 2 <1 2004-2009 poor ? ? FYRO Macedonia 0-5 <1 2001-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 medium 0 0 1980-2012 medium Netherlands 66-247 3 2006-2010 good + 17-316 2000-2011 good + 548-2131 1981-2011 good Norway 500-1,000 17 1994-2003 medium 0 0 2000-2013 medium ? Poland 550-700 15 2011-2012 good F 0 2005-2012 good ? Slovenia 0-2 <1 2008-2012 medium F 0-200 2001-2012 medium F 0-1000 1980-2012 medium Spain 9-29 <1 2008-2010 good 0 0 2001-2012 good + 1980-2012 medium Switzerland 2-14 <1 2008-2012 good F 0 2001-2012 good F 0 1980-2012 good Turkey 1-10 <1 2012 poor ? ? Ukraine 10-30 <1 1998-2009 medium F 10-30 1998-2009 medium F 20-40 1980-2009 medium United Kingdom 1,100 27 2004-2008 medium - 6 1999-2010 good + 64 1993-2010 medium EU27 3,200-3,600 80 Fluctuating Europe 3,700-4,800 100 Fluctuating 1 See 'Sources' at end of factsheet, and for more details on individual EU Member State reports, see the Article 12 reporting portal at http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/article12/report. 2 The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 In the few cases where population size estimates were reported in units other than those specified, they were converted to the correct units using standard correction factors. 4 The robustness of regional trends to the effects of any missing or incomplete data was tested using plausible scenarios, based on other sources of information, including any other reported information, recent national Red Lists, scientific literature, other publications and consultation with relevant experts. 5 Trend directions are reported as: increasing (+); decreasing (-); stable (0); fluctuating (F); or unknown (?). 6 Trend magnitudes are rounded to the nearest integer. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Trend maps A symbol appears in each country where the species occurs: the shape and colour of the symbol represent the population trend in that country, and the size of the symbol corresponds to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. KEY Ç Large increase (≥50%) È Large decrease (≥50%) Ç Moderate increase (20–49%) È Moderate decrease (20–49%) Ç Small increase (<20%) È Small decrease (<20%) ñ Increase of unknown magnitude ò Decrease of unknown magnitude å Stable or fluctuating 0 Unknown ¢ Present (no population or trend data) Ð Extinct since 1980 Each symbol, with the exception of Present and Extinct, may occur in up to three different size classes, corresponding to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. ñ Large: ≥10% of the European population ñ Medium: 1–9% of the European population ñ Small: <1% of the European population The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Figure 1. Breeding population sizes and short-term trends across Europe. Figure 2. Breeding population sizes and long-term trends across Europe. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Figure 3. Reported wintering population sizes and short-term trends across Europe. Note that some countries within the species' wintering range did not report any data. Figure 4. Reported wintering population sizes and long-term trends across Europe. Note that some countries within the species' wintering range did not report any data. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Podiceps auritus (Horned Grebe) Sources Albania Winter population size: Bino pers. obs. Winter short-term trend: Bino pers.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us