Tilt-Block/Half-Graben Basins Sedimentary Models for Extensional

Tilt-Block/Half-Graben Basins Sedimentary Models for Extensional

Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ at University of Leeds on August 17, 2014 Geological Society, London, Special Publications Sedimentary models for extensional tilt-block/half-graben basins M. R. Leeder and R. L. Gawthorpe Geological Society, London, Special Publications 1987, v.28; p139-152. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1987.028.01.11 Email alerting click here to receive free e-mail alerts when service new articles cite this article Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or request part of this article Subscribe click here to subscribe to Geological Society, London, Special Publications or the Lyell Collection Notes © The Geological Society of London 2014 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ at University of Leeds on August 17, 2014 Sedimentary models for extensional tilt-block/half-graben basins M.R. Leeder & R.L. Gawthorpe SUMMARY: Extensional tectonism produces characteristic half-graben/tilt-block systems whose facies mosaics are influenced by tectonically induced slopes resulting from hanging wall downtilting and footwall uplift. The characteristic asymmetrical subsidence vectors that therefore develop across the graben also exert a fundamental control upon facies distributions. A number of predictive tectono-sedimentary facies models are presented in which these various influences are explored. Alluvial fans and cones ~react to tilting by becoming segmented, those in the hanging wall showing down-dip hanging wall off-lap and those sourced in the footwall showing progradation from the apex. Lake and coastal waters react instantly to tilting, causing transgression and seiche-induced erosion. Axial through-flowing river channels and delta lobes tend to migrate or avulse towards the axis of maximum subsidence but may be constrained by the toes of footwall-sourced fans. Peat accumulation or soil development are accentuated up the hanging wall dip slope away from the locus of maximum deposition. In coastal areas, fan deltas sourced in the footwall pass offshore into small submarine fans whilst axial fans issue from delta fronts where indi- vidual fan lobes may migrate under fault control. In carbonate provinces the footwall scarp may become a bypass margin whilst the hanging wall dip slope may undergo a ramp-to- rimmed shelf evolution with time. It has become apparent in the last few years Wood 1984; Ziegler 1982). An increasing number that the process of lithospheric extension is of geologically ancient basins of this type are being characterized by a distinctive development of tilt recognized, e.g. the early Carboniferous exten- blocks and half-grabens bounded by major nor- sional province of the British Isles (Leeder 1982; mal faults (Morton & Black 1975; McKenzie Dewey 1982; Gawthorpe, in press), and doubtless 1978; Wernicke & Birchfiel 1982; Jackson et aL many others await recognition. 1982a, b; Brun & Choukroune 1983; Gibbs Recently major advances have been made 1984). These types of basins develop pro- concerning the dynamics and kinematics of gressively during extension, and we recognize normal faulting in areas of active extension that during this time they exert a profound and (Wernicke & Birchfiel 1982; Jackson et al. logical influence upon geomorphology and 1982a, b; Gibbs 1984; Jackson & McKenzie sediment-transfer mechanisms in the vicinity. 1983). It is the purpose of this paper to integrate Examples of active basins of this sort occur in such studies with analysis of sediment transfer the Aegean back-arc (McKenzie 1978; Jackson and deposition, the resulting three-dimensional et aL 1982b; Jackson & McKenzie 1983); in the tectono-sedimentary-facies models being Basin and Range Province of the western United helpful in the study of ancient basin-fill suc- States (Myers & Hamilton 1964; Wernicke & cessions. The models developed herein have Birchfiel 1982; Anderson et al. 1983); in the been culled from an extensive but scattered lower Rhine basin (Illies & Fuchs 1983); in the geomorphological and sedimentological litera- Gulf of Suez (Sellwood & Netherwood 1984); ture, our unpublished studies in active exten- and in Afar (Hutchinson & Engels 1970; Morton sional terrains (Aegean, Basin and Range), our & Black 1975). Extinct fault-bounded exten- work in the ancient extensional graben-fill suc- sional basins occur around the margins of cessions of the Lower Carboniferous in N Britain almost all Atlantic-type passive continental (Leeder 1982, 1986; Gawthorpe 1986, in press), margins (e.g. Surlyk 1977, 1978) and in con- and from previous stratigraphic-modelling con- tinental areas where extension did not proceed tributions (Bridge & Leeder 1979). to oceanic separation (failed arms) as in the Central African rift system (Browne & Fairhead 1983). These extinct basins usually lie buried Tilt-block/half-graben morphology beneath the later deposits of the thermal- and structure contraction phase of extensional subsidence. One of the best known examples is the North Originally, Morton & Black (1975) envisaged Sea basin (Christie & Sclater 1980; Barton & domino-type fault blocks forming during active From COWARD, M.P., DEWEY, J.F. & HANCOCK, P.L. (eds), 1987, Continental Extensional Tectonics, Geological Society Special Publication No. 28, pp. 139-152. 139 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ at University of Leeds on August 17, 2014 140 M.R. Leeder & R.L. Gawthorpe extension, with the further occurrence of pro- existence of crustal fractures ripe for rejuve- gressive fault rotation causing nucleation of nation (Anderson et.al. 1983; Eaton 1982). higher angle second- or third-generation normal Reduced to their simplest form, tilt- faults which themselves become progressively block/half-graben structures can be considered rotated. Structural studies in the Basin and to be bounded by single normal faults which Range Province have confirmed this model penetrate to mid-crustal levels. As the hanging (Proffett 1977) and led to a number of more wall basement detaches from the footwall an detailed tectonic models involving basement asymmetrical basin progressively develops above thrust reactivation, listric-fault fans and exten- the hanging wall. The fundamental controls sional analogues to the ramp and flat models of upon geomorphology and sedimentation pat- thrust tectonics (Wernicke & Birchfiel 1982; terns are as follows (see Figs 1 & 2): Brun & Choukroune~ 1983; Anderson et al. 1983; 1 Tectonic slopes. These are produced by a Chamberlin 1983; see also the general papers of combination of footwall uplift and hanging wall Gibbs 1983, 1984). These studies serve to stress subsidence and comprise the steeper footwall the great complexities of extensional faulting, scarp slope and the gentler hanging wall dip especially on an intrabasinal scale. slope. The footwall area is the main sediment Whilst American workers in the Basin and source for the adjacent basin although, due to Range Province have stressed the importance of the asymmetrical nature of the basin, the hang- shallow, 'domino-style' faulting, workers in the ing wall-derived sediment may be spatially more Aegean extensional province (McKenzie 1978; extensive. Recent geomorphological studies Jackson et al. 1982a, b) have shown the import- (Hanks et al. 1984) demonstrate that the gradual ance of major normal faults of mid-crustal decay of the scarp profile with time follows a penetration which bound 'bouyant' tilt blocks. decay equation of the error-function type. The Some examples of this type of fault also occur in periodic rejuvenation of the footwall scarp will the Basin and Range Province (Anderson et al. give rise to important sedimentary consequences 1983). These major faults cause instantaneous in the basin fill (q.v.). In examples where the unloading along the fault plane during fault basin-margin fault has a listric geometry, tilting motion leading to an instantaneous isostatic of the surface during extension is accompanied upwarp of the footwall block (Heiskanen & by rotation and the development of a rollover Vening Meinesz 1958; Savage & Hastie 1966; Bott structure. 1976). Jackson & McKenzie (1983) calculate this 2 Asymmetrical subsidence. This is due to the footwall uplift to be around 10% of the hanging pivot-like motion of the hanging wall after wall subsidence. individual extensional episodes. Asymmetrical Whether small- or large-scale faulting de- subsidence following historic earthquakes is best velops seems to depend upon the extensional documented for the Hebgen Lake area ~ of strain rate, the geothermal gradient and the Montana, USA. In Fig. 2a we reproduce the -ve displacement vectors HANGING WALL DIP SLOPE +re displacement vectors HANGINGWALL ~/~ FOOTWALL / FIG. 1. Nomenclature diagram for tectonic slopes associated with a simple tilt block/half-graben. The main tec- tonic slopes produced during basin development are the steep, spatially restricted footwall scarp associated with the footwall-to-han~ingwall transition, and a broad, gentle Slope, the hanging wall dip slope, characteristic of the hanging wall of the basin-forming fault. The fulcrum is the position where displacement of the hanging wall block is zero; either the limit of roll-over in isolate tilt block/half-grabens or the transition from areas of the hanging wall undergoing positive motion due to footwall uplift to areas undergoing negative motion due to hanging wall subsidence. The position of the fulcrum is governed by the relative displacement vectors across the half-graben-bounding fault(s), the presence of antithetic/synthetic intrabasin structures

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us