Assessment of Forest Birds on Saipan

Assessment of Forest Birds on Saipan

Status and Trends of the Land Bird Avifauna on Saipan 2008 Hawai`i Conservation Conference Based on a report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by R.J. Camp, T.K. Pratt, A.P. Marshall, F. Amidon, and L.L. Williams Outline • Introduction • Sampling – Population estimation – Trend estimation • Estimates • Threats • Focal Species – Nightingale Reed-Warbler Introduction • Mariana Islands identified as an Endemic Bird Area by BirdLife International – Increasing human population & rampant habitat transformation – Brown Tree Snake (Bogia irregularis) eliminated most birds on Guam – Brown Tree Snake now reported from Saipan • Faced with large-scale habitat change and an imminent new predator, how are land birds on Saipan fairing? The Birds B. Kumiu E. VanderWerf T. Shears Yellow Bittern White-throated Ground-Dove Mariana Fruit-Dove J. Yue T. Pete Collared Kingfisher Micronesian Myzomela The Birds A. Leishman E. VanderWerf S. Vogt Rufous Fantail Nightingale Reed-Warbler Bridled White-eye T. Pete E. VanderWerf Golden White-eye Micronesian Starling The Birds S. Vogt E. VanderWerf Micronesian Megapode Micronesian Swiftlet T. Rosell L. Kee T. Pete Island Collared-Dove Eurasian Tree Sparrow Orange-cheeked Waxbill Sampling • 1982 (Engbring et al.) • 1997 (USFWS) • 2007 (USFWS) • Standard point- transect sampling – 14 transects – 244-248 stations – 242 resampled Estimation • Fit a species specific detection function to account for birds present but missed • Estimate density and variance by species – Global detection function – Account for covariates (eg weather) – Annual estimates generated Trends • Determine trend with repeated measures ANOVA – Densities were log + 1 transformed – Compound symmetry variance-covariance structure – Kenward-Roger adjustment to df – Tukey’s adjustment for multiple-comparisons • Increasing, stable or declining trends Increasing Densities 40 140 35 A B B 120 A A B 30 100 25 80 20 60 Density 15 Density 10 40 5 20 0 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Year Yellow Bittern White-throated Ground-dove 700 300 600 A A B 250 A B C 500 200 400 150 300 Density 200 Density 100 100 50 0 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Year Micronesian Myzomela Micronesian Starling Increasing Densities 8 7 A B B 6 5 4 Density 3 2 1 0 60 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 50 A B B Year 40 30 Eurasian Tree Sparrow Density 20 10 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 6 Year 5 A A B 4 Island Collared-dove 3 Density 2 1 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Orange-cheeked Waxbill Stable Densities 60 50 A B A 40 30 Density 20 10 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 70 60 A A A Year 50 40 Collared Kingfisher 30 Density 20 10 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 70 60 Year A A A 50 40 30 Mariana Fruit-dove Density 20 10 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Bridled White-eye Decreasing Densities 1200 2000 1000 A B C A B C 1500 800 600 10% 1000 Density Density 23% 400 41% 500 29% 200 47% 45% 0 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Year Rufous Fantail Golden White-eye 80 70 A B C 60 50 40 30% Density 30 20 44% 10 61% 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Nightingale Reed-Warbler Other Birds 500 400 A A B 300 200 Density Micronesian Megapode 100 • Very rare species 0 • 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Detected 5 1 0 Year • Saipan population declining • Although more common on Micronesian Swiftlet other Mariana Islands • numbers a magnitude smaller • no movement assumption violated • preferentially record near point • distances biased low > overestimates Rapid human development • 429% increase between 1980 & 2000; subsequent decline • Coastal plain, southern plateau, Kagman peninsula (70%) Land class & disturbance Saipan 100 • Introduced Forest 80 60 – 27% Percent 40 • Secondary Forest 20 0 – Forest Secondary Agroforest Nonforest 30% Vegetation Land Class • Agroforest Saipan – 11% 100 80 • Minimum Disturbed 60 40 – 68% Percent 20 Falanruw et al. 1989 0 Introduced Limestone Casuarina Forest Type Nightingale Reed-Warbler • Regional Comparisons • Habitat Associations Photo by CNMI-DFW NIRW Regional Comparisons • Little development – Suicide – Tanapag • More development – Garapan – Kagman – Susupe – Fadang • Repeated measures ANOVA NIRW Regional Comparisons 2 Less Development More Development . 1.5 a b b a a b a b b a b c 1 a a a a a b b b 0.5 NIRW Density (SE) 0 1982 1997 2007 1982 1997 2007 1982 1997 2007 1982 1997 2007 1982 1997 2007 1982 1997 2007 Suicide Tanapag Garapan Kagman Susupe Fadang Year and Region NIRW Habitat Associations • Suitable habitat – Open, Secondary forest and Tangantangan thicket • Less suitable habitat – Golf course, Limestone forest and Residential • 2-way repeated measures ANOVA NIRW Habitat Associations • 58 to 22 birds/km2 Habitat 1982 2007 • Year & Habitat effects Suitable Densities • Large-scale habitat change Open 37 22 • Imminent new predator – SF 31 25 brown tree snake TT 40 27 • Saipan Upland Mitigation Less Suitable Bank (2002) GC 38 4 • Surveying frequency LF 18 8 • Surveying effort • Demographic studies Res 60 5 Acknowledgements • Funding: • Data Sets – CNMI Division of Fish – 1982: Engbring, Ramsey & and Wildlife Wildman – U.S. Fish and Wildlife – 1997: USFWS Service • Bird Observers – U.S. Geological – C. Aguon, F. Amidon, P. Survey – PIERC Ashman, J. Engbring, J. Lepson, A. Marshall, G. • Thanks to: Martin, P. Pyle, N. Shema, – M. Gorresen, J. P. Radley, M. Reynolds, & Hatfield, R. Holden, S. L. Williams Kremer, & L. Mehrhoff .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    22 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us