The Effects of Inclination, Gravity Darkening and Differential Rotation on Absorption Profiles of Fast Rotators

The Effects of Inclination, Gravity Darkening and Differential Rotation on Absorption Profiles of Fast Rotators

A&A 408, 707–713 (2003) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030966 & c ESO 2003 Astrophysics The effects of inclination, gravity darkening and differential rotation on absorption profiles of fast rotators A. Reiners? Hamburger Sternwarte, Universit¨at Hamburg, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany Received 6 May 2003 / Accepted 20 June 2003 Abstract. Mechanisms influencing absorption line profiles of fast rotating stars can be sorted into two groups; (i) intrinsic variations sensitive to temperature and pressure, and (ii) global effects common to all spectral lines. I present a detailed study on the latter effects focusing on gravity darkening and inclination for various rotational velocities and spectral types. It is shown that the line shapes of rapidly and rigidly rotating stars mainly depend on the equatorial velocity ve, not on the projected rotational velocity v sin i which determines the lines’ widths. The influence of gravity darkening and spectral type on the line profiles is shown. The results demonstrate the possibility of determining the inclination angle i of single fast rotators, and they show that constraints on gravity darkening can be drawn for stellar samples. While significant line profile deformation occurs 1 in stars rotating as fast as ve > 200 km s− , for slower rotators profile distortions are marginal. In these cases spectral signatures induced by, e.g., differential∼ rotation are not affected by gravity darkening and the methods applicable to slow rotators can be applied to these faster rotators, too. Key words. line: profiles – stars: rotation 1. Introduction Collins & Truax (1995) come to the conclusion that the detec- tion of secondary effects like limb darkening and differential The information contained in line profiles of rotating stars has rotation is improbable in line profiles of fast rotators. been studied since the recognition of spectral Doppler broad- ening itself. The multitude of different mechanisms influenc- Under what circumstances the approximation of various ing line profiles presents a confusing picture for the possibility broadening mechanisms by convolutions breaks down, only of determining them. Approximations exist for rotational line depends on the sensitivity of the spectral line on temperature broadening, (linear) limb darkening, differential rotation, tur- and gas pressure. Spectral quality in terms of signal-to-noise as bulence, rotational flattening and gravity darkening, etc. While well as in wavelength coverage has improved and makes pos- distinguishing these interacting mechanisms is a delicate issue, sible analyses of weak absorption features. Observers are not 1 in the case of slow rotators (v sin i < 50 km s− ) rotational flat- restricted to the extremely temperature and pressure sensitive tening and gravity darkening can be neglected. Utilizing the lines of the lightest elements H and He. Fast rotation is the rule Fourier transform technique Gray (1973, 1976) also showed in stars of spectral types as late as F5, and in the spectra of fast that turbulent velocities to some extent can be distinguished rotating A- and F-stars a large number of heavy ion lines exist from rotation. where the approximation of rotational broadening by a convo- In fast rotators the situation becomes more complex, since lution becomes valid again. Especially the deconvolution of an centrifugal forces distort the spherical shape of the stellar sur- “overall” broadening function inherent in all lines by using the face and the line profiles depend on the inclination the star is methods of Least Squares Deconvolution (LSD, e.g., Cameron observed under. Beyond the additional degree of freedom this 2000) can provide reliable broadening profiles independent of would not be a major problem if temperature (and pressure) line specific intrinsic mechanisms. were not connected to gravity. With different regions on the stellar surface having significantly different temperatures and In this paper the effects of fast rotation are examined in de- gas pressures, line profiles no longer can be approximated by tail focusing on geometric distortions and gravity darkening on convolution between a single intrinsic line profile and the rota- stars observed under different inclination angles. These effects tional broadening function. For this reason, the effects of fast underly all spectral lines independent of their intrinsic shape rotation on line profiles often were studied for specific absorp- and temperature or pressure dependencies. The modelled spec- tion lines (e.g., Stoeckley 1968; Hardorp & Strittmatter 1968); tra assume no intrinsic temperature or pressure dependence; whether this can be applied to specific spectral lines or groups ? e-mail: [email protected] of lines has to be checked individually. Article published by EDP Sciences and available at http://www.aanda.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20030966 708 A. Reiners: Inclination and gravity darkening in fast rotators In Reiners & Schmitt (2002a) the possibility of detecting rotation law in analogy to the solar case. Assuming reasonable differential rotation in line profiles was demonstrated. This pa- values of inclination angles i, the small projected rotational ve- per also answers the question of whether the technique used locities of the stars in that sample give no reason to expect ef- there is applicable to fast rotators, too. It shows what can be fects due to distortions of the gravitational potential, and dif- learned about gravity darkening and inclination angle from the ferential rotation is thought to be the cause of the determined shape of stellar absorption line profiles. profile signatures. It is an open question, to what extent differ- ential rotation can be detected in faster rotators, where defor- 2. Absorption profiles of fast rotators mation and gravity darkening become important. 2.1. Line-independent broadening 2.2. Profile shape characteristics Absorption line profiles observed in fast rotating stars are Stellar line profiles are subject to a number of different mech- affected by three mechanisms inherent in all lines: (a) the anisms affecting their shape. Besides the mentioned effects projected geometry of the star, (b) the flux distribution due to of gravity darkening and rotation law, limb darkening, addi- temperature variations (known as gravity darkening) on the ro- tional (turbulent) velocity fields and stellar surface structure tating stellar surface, and (c) the rotation law. These three line- like spots can significantly contribute to the line profiles’ shape. independent mechanisms will be discussed in the following. Utilizing the Fourier transform turns out to be of great advan- Case (a) is well understood, fast rotation diminishes the tage in disentangling the different effects. When approximat- gravitational potential at the equator and alters the star’s ing line broadening by convolutions, their interaction can be sphericity. As a consequence, lines of constant projected rota- studied most easily using Fourier transforms, since the compu- tional velocities no longer lie on chords but are bent (cp., e.g., tationally complicated convolutions become multiplications in Collins & Truax 1995). Although an analytical description of Fourier domain (cf., e.g., Gray 1976). the surface velocity distribution is not then available, calcula- Reiners & Schmitt (2002a) utilized the zeros of the Fourier tion by integrating over the stellar surface is unproblematic. transformed line profiles to search for the subtle effects of dif- (b) Since the presence of gravity darkening was initially de- ferential rotation. They showed that the ratio of the first two scribed by von Zeipel (1924), many publications were written zeros q and q is a direct indicator for solar-like – i.e., Equator on the correct gravity dependence of surface temperature. In 1 2 faster than Pole – differential rotation (α>0 in Eq. (2)). The general, gravity darkening is described in terms of a parame- value of the ratio q =q is extremely sensitive to the profile’s ter β used in the equation 2 1 shape, and is unaffected by the “standard” turbulent velocity β Teff g : (1) fields like micro- and macroturbulence even for rotational ve- ∝ 1 locities as low as 10 km s− . Using a linear limb darkening law The “classical” value of β = 0:25 found by von Zeipel (1924) with a parameter , in a rigidly rotating star the value of q2=q1 is valid only for conservative rotation laws in stars without con- can be approximated as vective envelopes. A value of β = 0:08 is derived for stars with q convective envelopes (Lucy 1967). Tuominen (1972) approxi- 2 = 1:831 0:108 0:0222 + 0:0093 + 0:0094 (3) mates a value of β 0:15 for differentially rotating stars, and q1 − − ≈ for magnetic stars without convection zones, Smith (1975) re- (Dravins et al. 1990). Thus for a rigid rotator the value of q2=q1 ports a slightly different value of β = 0:275. The most com- is always between 1.72 and 1.83 regardless of the limb dark- prehensive calculations were carried out by Claret (1998), who ening coefficient. Differential rotation significantly diminishes provides tables of stellar parameters including β for a series this ratio (cf Reiners & Schmitt 2002a), while polar spots lead of stars at various evolutionary stages. The calculations are in to an increase (Reiners & Schmitt 2002b). general agreement with the cited works; stars of spectral types Since the ratio q2=q1 turns out to be an easily accessible later than A2 harboring convective envelopes have a value of parameter characteristic for the line’s shape, I continue to use ∼ β 0:08, for earlier-type stars, β = 0:25 seems a good choice. it for studying the influence of gravity darkening in rapidly ro- ≈ These calculations are also consistent with measurements of β tating stars. For a more detailed discussion of the correlations in eclipsing binaries carried out by Rafert & Twigg (1980), al- between differential rotation α, the inclination angle i and q2=q1 though a large scatter appears in the data (cp. Fig. 7 in Claret see Reiners & Schmitt (2002a, 2003).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us