Host Population Genetics and Biogeography Structure the Microbiome of the Sponge Cliona Delitrix

Host Population Genetics and Biogeography Structure the Microbiome of the Sponge Cliona Delitrix

Received: 11 October 2019 | Revised: 20 December 2019 | Accepted: 23 December 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6033 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Host population genetics and biogeography structure the microbiome of the sponge Cliona delitrix Cole G. Easson1,2 | Andia Chaves-Fonnegra3 | Robert W. Thacker4 | Jose V. Lopez2 1Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN Abstract 2Halmos College of Natural Sciences Sponges occur across diverse marine biomes and host internal microbial communities and Oceanography, Nova Southeastern that can provide critical ecological functions. While strong patterns of host specific- University, Dania Beach, FL 3Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College, Harbor ity have been observed consistently in sponge microbiomes, the precise ecological Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida relationships between hosts and their symbiotic microbial communities remain to be Atlantic University, Fort Pierce, FL fully delineated. In the current study, we investigate the relative roles of host popu- 4Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY lation genetics and biogeography in structuring the microbial communities hosted by the excavating sponge Cliona delitrix. A total of 53 samples, previously used to Correspondence Cole G. Easson, Department of Biology, demarcate the population genetic structure of C. delitrix, were selected from two lo- Middle Tennessee State University, cations in the Caribbean Sea and from eight locations across the reefs of Florida and Murfreesboro, TN 37132, USA. Email: [email protected] the Bahamas. Microbial community diversity and composition were measured using Illumina-based high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4 region and related to Funding information Division of Ocean Sciences, Grant/ host population structure and geographic distribution. Most operational taxonomic Award Number: 1915949; Division of units (OTUs) specific to Cliona delitrix microbiomes were rare, while other OTUs were Environmental Biology, Grant/Award Number: 1208310 shared with congeneric hosts. Across a large regional scale (>1,000 km), geographic distance was associated with considerable variability of the sponge microbiome, sug- gesting a distance–decay relationship, but little impact over smaller spatial scales (<300 km) was observed. Host population structure had a moderate effect on the structure of these microbial communities, regardless of geographic distance. These results support the interplay between geographic, environmental, and host factors as forces determining the community structure of microbiomes associated with C. delitrix. Moreover, these data suggest that the mechanisms of host regulation can be observed at the population genetic scale, prior to the onset of speciation. KEYWORDS Cliona delitrix, microbiome, population genetics, porifera 1 | INTRODUCTION range of habitats in shallow and deep seas from tropical to polar lat- itudes (Bergquist, 1978; Manconi & Pronzato, 2008; Van Soest et Marine sponges are an ancient phylum of animals (~600 million years al., 2012; Yin et al., 2015). The success of sponges in these systems old) that is globally distributed and has successfully colonized a wide is linked to their ability to efficiently remove and retain particulate This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Ecology and Evolution. 2020;10:2007–2020. www.ecolevol.org | 2007 2008 | EASSON ET AL. (bacteria, phytoplankton, viruses) and dissolved organic matter from 2013). Taken together, these studies suggest that sponge-associated the water column via filter feeding (Maldonado, Ribes, & van Duyl, microbial communities are influenced by both host-specific and en- 2012). Many sponges also host diverse microbial symbiont communi- vironmental factors (Easson & Thacker, 2014; Marino et al., 2017; ties that have likely contributed to their ecological and evolutionary Taylor, Radax, Steger, & Wagner, 2007; Thomas et al., 2016). At a success (Easson & Thacker, 2014; Erwin & Thacker, 2008; Freeman global scale, microbiomes of individual sponge species exhibited rel- & Thacker, 2011; Lopez, 2019). These internal microbiomes can sup- atively low within-host-species variability, suggesting that sponge plement heterotrophic nutrition from filter feeding by accessing in- tissues can form a generally selective habitat at the scale of individ- organic carbon and nitrogen resources, mediating dissolved organic ual host species; this trend was consistent irrespective of microbial matter assimilation, and recycling host-derived nitrogen (Freeman diversity or abundance (Thomas et al., 2016). However, environmen- & Thacker, 2011; de Goeij, Berg, Oostveen, Epping, & Duyl, 2008; tal influences on microbial community structure were not explicitly Southwell, Weisz, Martens, & Lindquist, 2008; Webster & Taylor, tested in this large-scale study. 2012). Sponges reproduce by brooding their embryos or through Early studies of sponge microbiology classified sponge species broadcast spawning, in most cases, of fertilized eggs (Maldonado into two groups based on microbial community abundance: High & Bergquist, 2002). Their larval dispersal is limited due to a variety and low microbial abundance (HMA & LMA, respectively; Hentschel, of factors, including planktonic larval duration (<72 hr), transport of Usher, & Taylor, 2006; Rützler, 1974; Rützler, 1981; Vacelet & eggs and embryo development (<2 weeks), and limited swimming Donadey, 1977) and assigned specific morphological and functional capabilities that leave them at mercy of ocean currents (Chaves- traits to sponges in each group (reliance on microbial symbionts; Fonnegra, Feldheim, Secord, & Lopez, 2015; Maldonado & Riesgo, functional attributes; microbial abundance, diversity, and composi- 2008; Maldonado & Young, 1996). In the Caribbean and western tion; Weisz, 2006; Weisz, Hentschel, Lindquist, & Martens, 2007). Atlantic, the population structure of sponge species tends to ex- However, recent research eroded this strict dichotomy (Easson & hibit a high degree of isolation, while connectivity varies in relation Thacker, 2014; Freeman et al., 2014; Thomas et al., 2016) and indi- to life-history strategies and the speed of oceanographic currents cated a high degree of species specificity in microbial diversity, com- (Chaves-Fonnegra et al., 2015; Debiasse, Richards, & Shivji, 2010; position, and function (Freeman, Easson, & Baker, 2014; Reveillaud Richards, Bernard, Feldheim, & Shivji, 2016). Despite these limit- et al., 2014; Schmitt et al., 2012). In addition, unlike HMA or LMA ing factors, sponges have been highly successful in their expansion status (Gloeckner et al., 2014), some of these traits are correlated across large latitudinal gradients and diverse environmental condi- with host phylogeny (Easson & Thacker, 2014; Freeman et al., 2014; tions in the Caribbean Sea (Van Soest et al., 2012). Possession of Thomas et al., 2016). robust population genetic data for sponge species spanning large The microbial community composition and functional ecology oceanic areas is not yet common (Chaves-Fonnegra et al., 2015; of sponges might be influenced by local environmental factors, es- DeBiasse, Richards, Shivji, & Hellberg, 2016; Swierts et al., 2017), pecially in LMA species, since sponges are continuously exposed which makes the opportunity to couple this type of data with cor- to a diverse and dynamic consortium of seawater microorganisms responding bacterial symbiont signals even more compelling. Thus, via filter feeding. Despite this exposure, most sponge species host understanding the intricacies of how these ancient animals can suc- microbial assemblages that are distinct from those found in the cessfully adapt to and colonize divergent environments is still an surrounding seawater (Taylor et al., 2013). In some cases, specific open question and one of the greater interests under current condi- associations are maintained by vertical transfer of microorganisms tions of global climate change. from parents to eggs and larvae (Diaz, Thacker, Rützler, & Piantoni As sponges have dispersed and speciated across the globe, it is Dietrich, 2007; Olson & Gao, 2013; Pita, López-Legentil, & Erwin, clear that they have also acquired new microbial symbionts that might 2013; Reveillaud et al., 2014; Schmitt, Weisz, Lindquist, & Hentschel, have helped them adapt or acclimate to novel nutritional environments 2007; Sharp, Eam, Faulkner, & Haygood, 2007). (Thomas et al., 2016). While strong patterns of host specificity have Across the large biogeographic range of some sponge species, been consistently observed, the relationship between host speciation one might expect a highly variable nutritional environment (with and microbial community composition remains equivocal for many spe- varying composition and concentrations of particulate and dissolved cies. Sponge speciation is a continuous process involving slow genetic organic matter and inorganic nutrients), which might influence host divergence over time often resulting from reproductive isolation. At reliance on symbiont-derived nutrition. However, data from a limited intermediate steps of host speciation, potential microbial community number of species suggest that this reliance is likely species-specific divergence might simultaneously occur due to

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us