NIST Advanced Manufacturing Series 100-37 Annual Report on U.S. Manufacturing Industry Statistics: 2020 An examination of how U.S. manufacturing compares to other countries, the trends in the domestic industry, and the industry trends compared to those in other countries. Douglas S. Thomas This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-37 NIST Advanced Manufacturing Series 100-37 Annual Report on U.S. Manufacturing Industry Statistics: 2020 Douglas S. Thomas Applied Economics Office Engineering Laboratory This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-37 October 2020 0 - 37 U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Walter Copan, NIST Director and Undersecretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. National Institute of Standards and Technology Advanced Manufacturing Series 100-37 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Adv. Man. Ser. 100-37, 60 pages (October 2020) This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-37 0 - 37 Preface This study was conducted by the Applied Economics Office (AEO) in the Engineering Laboratory (EL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The study provides aggregate manufacturing industry data and industry subsector data to develop a quantitative depiction of the U.S. manufacturing industry. This publication is available free available is publication ofThis charge from: Disclaimer Certain trade names and company products are mentioned in the text in order to adequately specify the technical procedures and equipment used. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the products are necessarily the best available for the purpose. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100 - 37 iv Table of Contents PREFACE .......................................................................................................................................................... IV TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. V LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... VI This publication is available free available is publication ofThis charge from: LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ VI LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ................................................................................................................ 5 1.3 SCOPE AND APPROACH .................................................................................................................... 7 2 VALUE ADDED ........................................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON .......................................................................................................... 9 2.2 DOMESTIC DETAILS ....................................................................................................................... 13 3 US MANUFACTURING SUPPLY CHAIN ................................................................................................. 23 4 EMPLOYMENT, COMPENSATION, PROFITS, AND PRODUCTIVITY ..................................................... 33 5 RESEARCH, INNOVATION, AND FACTORS FOR DOING BUSINESS ...................................................... 41 https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100 6 DISCUSSION.......................................................................................................................................... 49 - 37 v List of Figures Figure 1.1: Illustration of Objectives – Drive Inputs and Negative Externalities Down while Increasing Production Output and Product Function ........................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1.2: Data Categorization for Examining the Economics of Manufacturing ......................................... 6 Figure 1.3: Illustration of the Feasibility of Data Collection and Availability ................................................ 8 Figure 2.1: National 25-Year Compound Annual Growth, by Country (1993 to 2018): Higher is Better .... 10 Figure 2.2: National 5-Year Compound Annual Growth, by Country (2013 to 2018): Higher is Better ...... 10 Figure 2.3: Manufacturing Value Added, Top 10 Manufacturing Countries (1970 to 2018)........................ 11 Figure 2.4: Manufacturing Value Added Per Capita, Top 10 Largest Manufacturing Countries (1970 to 2017): Higher is Better................................................................................................................................... 12 This publication is available free available is publication ofThis charge from: Figure 2.5: Manufacturing Per Capita Ranking, 1970-2018: Lower is Better............................................... 12 Figure 2.6: Global Manufacturing Value Added by Industry, Top Five Producers and Rest of World (ROW) (2015) – 64 Countries .................................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 2.7: Cumulative Percent Change in Value Added (2012 Chained Dollars) ....................................... 14 Figure 2.8: Value Added for Durable Goods by Type (billions of chained dollars), 2006-2019 .................. 15 Figure 2.9: Value Added for Nondurable Goods by Type (billions of chained dollars), 2006-2019: Higher is Better .............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Figure 2.10: Manufacturing Value Added by Subsector (billions of chained dollars) .................................. 16 Figure 2.11: Value Added for Durable Goods by Type (constant dollars), 2006-2019 ................................ 17 Figure 2.12: Value Added for Nondurable Goods by Type (constant dollars, billions), 2006-2019 ............ 17 Figure 2.13: Manufacturing Value Added by Subsector, BEA (constant dollars, billions), 2006-2019 ....... 18 Figure 2.14: Current-Cost Net Stock: Private Equipment, Manufacturing (2006-2018)............................... 19 Figure 2.15: Current-Cost Net Stock: Private Structures, Manufacturing (2006-2018) ................................ 20 Figure 2.16: Current-Cost Net Stock: Intellectual Property Products, Manufacturing (2006-2018)............. 21 Figure 2.17: Current-Cost Net Stock in Manufacturing, by Type (2006-2018) ............................................ 22 Figure 3.1: Manufacturing Supply Chain, 2016 ............................................................................................ 24 Figure 3.2: Breakdown of Expenditures as a Percent of Revenue, Annual Survey of Manufactures ........... 31 Figure 4.1: Cumulative Change in Percent in Manufacturing Employment (Seasonally Adjusted), 2006- https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100 2020................................................................................................................................................................ 35 Figure 4.2: Manufacturing Fatalities and Injuries.......................................................................................... 37 Figure 4.3: Average Weekly Hours for All Employees (Seasonally Adjusted) ............................................ 37 Figure 4.4: Average Hourly Wages for Manufacturing and Private Industry (Seasonally Adjusted) ........... 38 Figure 4.5: Employee Compensation (Hourly) .............................................................................................. 38 Figure 4.6: Profits for Corporations and Income for Proprietorships ............................................................ 39 Figure 4.7: Manufacturing Labor Productivity Index (2012 Base Year = 100) ............................................ 39 Figure 4.8: Manufacturing Multifactor Productivity Index (2012 Base Year = 100) .................................... 40 Figure 4.9: Output per Labor Hour (Top Ten Countries Out of 66) .............................................................. 40 Figure 5.1: Patent Applications (Residents) per Million People, Top Ten (1990-2020) ..............................