M33157: Law of Trusts | University of Nottingham

M33157: Law of Trusts | University of Nottingham

10/01/21 M33157: Law of Trusts | University of Nottingham M33157: Law of Trusts View Online Abou-Rahmah v Abacha [2006] EWCA Civ 1492, [2007] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 115. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZeJn1iZmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBj rMi6atF>. AIB Group (UK) Plc v Redler [2014] UKSC 58. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmYqJnXidlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BU LezIOdm9baa>. Barlow Clowes International Ltd & Anor v Eurotrust International Ltd & Ors (Isle of Man) [2005] UKPC 37, [2006] 1 All ER 333. N.p. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4J3N-DJ90-TWP1-602G &csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>. Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Vaughan [1992] 4 All ER 22. N.p. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49F0-TWP1-60B 5&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>. Bishopgate Investment Management Ltd v Homan [1995] 1 All ER 347. N.p. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-60R5 &csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>. Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZn0itmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIo W0ha>. Boscawen v Bajwa [1995] 4 All ER 769. N.p. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-601G &csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>. Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1, 16-18. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJnWqJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjI oW0ha/bristol-and-west-building-society-v-mothew>. ‘Charities Act 2011.’ Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/25/contents/enacted>. Choithram International SA v Pagarani [2001] 1 WLR 1. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mtmXuJn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9M BjrMi6atF>. ‘Developing the Obligation Characteristic of the Trust.’ Law Quarterly Review 117 (2001): 1/7 10/01/21 M33157: Law of Trusts | University of Nottingham n. pag. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d7c0c50 008d93177f&docguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=ICCAEDD80E72 111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&cont ext=8&resolvein=true>. ---. Law Quarterly Review 117 (2001): n. pag. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d7c0c50 008d93177f&docguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=ICCAEDD80E72 111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&cont ext=8&resolvein=true>. ‘Discretionary Trusts and Powers of Appointment: Progressive Assimilation.’ The Canterbury law review 1992. Web. <https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/3253>. ‘Editor’s Notebook: The Still Not Ended, Never-Ending Story.’ The conveyancer and property lawyer (2012): 83–86. Print. El Ajou v Dollar Land Holdings [1993] 3 All ER 717. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXitm0CdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezI Odm9baa>. Emery, C.T. ‘The Most Hallowed Principle: Certainty of Beneficiaries of Trusts and Powers of Appointment.’ The law quarterly review 98 (1982): n. pag. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9e42ab19-4e99-e711-80cb-005056af4099> . ‘Explaining the Trust.’ The law quarterly review 131 (2015): n. pag. Print. FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, [2014] 3 WLR 535. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadn2mdo1KdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2B ULezIOdm9baa>. Foskett v McKeown [1997] 3 All ER 392 (CA). N.p. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60JM &csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>. Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 (HL). N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GJn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6 atF/foskett-v-mckeown>. Gardner, Simon. An Introduction to the Law of Trusts. 3rd ed. Clarendon law series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print. ---. An Introduction to the Law of Trusts. 3rd ed. Clarendon law series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print. ---. An Introduction to the Law of Trusts. 3rd ed. Clarendon law series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print. ---. An Introduction to the Law of Trusts. 3rd ed. Clarendon law series. New York: Oxford 2/7 10/01/21 M33157: Law of Trusts | University of Nottingham University Press, 2011. Print. Grant v Edwards [1986] Ch 638. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3iJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0h a/grant-v-edwards-and-another>. Gravells, Nigel P. ‘Public Purpose Trusts.’ Modern Law Review 40 (1977): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr40&div=40&collection=journ als&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>. Hayton, David. ‘Chapter 1, Equity’s Identification Rules.’ Laundering and Tracing. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995. 1–21. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=730137f3-f691-e611-80c7-005056af4099>. Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2GdnZuto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MB jrMi6atF>. ‘Jones v Kernott: Inferring and Imputing in Essex.’ The conveyancer and property lawyer (2012): 167–180. Print. ‘Knowing Assistance and Knowing Receipt: Taking Stock.’ The law quarterly review 112 (1996): n. pag. Print. McPhail v Doulton [1971] AC 424. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utn1aZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIo W0ha>. Midland Bank Plc v Cooke [1995] 4 All ER 562. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYaJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6 atF/midland-bank-v-cooke-and-another>. Nelson v Greening & Sykes [2007] EWCA Civ 1358. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZeJnXeJmZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MB jrMi6atF>. Nicholls, Lord. ‘Chapter 15, Knowing Receipt: The Need for a New Landmark, from: Restitution : Past, Present and Future : Essays in Honour of Gareth Jones.’ Restitution: Past, Present and Future : Essays in Honour of Gareth Jones. Oxford: Hart, 1998. 231–246. Web. <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1772785>. Pearce, Robert A., and Warren Barr. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University 3/7 10/01/21 M33157: Law of Trusts | University of Nottingham Press, 2018. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Print. ---. Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Print. Pearce, Robert A., John Stevens, and Warren Barr. The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print. Penner, J. E. The Law of Trusts. 10th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts. 10th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts. 10th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print. 4/7 10/01/21 M33157: Law of Trusts | University of Nottingham ---. The Law of Trusts. 10th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts. 10th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts. 10th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts. 9th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts. 9th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts. 9th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts. 9th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts. 9th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print. ---. The Law of Trusts. 9th ed. Core text series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print. Pennington v Waine [2002] 1 WLR 2075. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdn0itnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIo W0ha>. Re Baden (No 2)

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us