Wilderness As a Place for Scientific Inquiry; 1999 May 23–27; Missoula, MT

Wilderness As a Place for Scientific Inquiry; 1999 May 23–27; Missoula, MT

Ecosystem Dynamics and Disturbance in Mountain Wildernesses: Assessing Vulnerability of Natural Resources to Change Daniel B. Fagre David L. Peterson Abstract—An integrated program of ecosystem modeling and ex- also are the only places where we can learn how relatively tensive field studies at Glacier and Olympic National Parks has unaltered natural systems work, and they serve as bench- quantified many of the ecological processes affected by climatic marks against which the state of human-dominated sys- variability and disturbance. Models have successfully estimated tems can be compared. Thus, mountain wildernesses are snow distribution, annual watershed discharge, and stream tem- globally important and affect people even great distances perature variation based on seven years of monitoring. Various from mountains. climatic scenarios were applied with the models to examine poten- Mountain wildernesses worldwide are being affected by tial future wilderness conditions. This modeling indicates that global-scale environmental stressors, such as increasing reduced net primary productivity and altered disturbance patterns atmospheric pollution and climatic change. They also are can be expected in dry, east-side forest ecosystems in Montana and being impacted by nearby landscape fragmentation, intro- Washington under climatic warming. In addition, empirical studies ductions of diseases, exotic plant invasions, increasing rec- show that climatic variability has strong teleconnections with tree reational pressures and, over the past century, alteration of growth and regeneration at annual to decadal scales, resulting in natural fire regimes. predictable, directional changes under different climatic scenarios. The potential for ecological change in mountainous na- A transect of mountain bioregions from the Pacific Coast to the tional parks of the western United States was recognized Rocky Mountains, which builds on past research, is determining and addressed by the National Park Service (NPS) when it how future climatic variability will affect wilderness in the context initiated research programs in 1990 under the U.S. Global of regional ecosystem dynamics. Change Research Program. The NPS program objectives were to (1) contribute to our understanding of ecosystem response to climatic change, (2) detect and document changes attributable to climatic change as part of a national monitor- Mountains are a dominant feature of our planet, covering ing network and (3) assess the future impacts of climatic one-fifth of the terrestrial biosphere and being home to one- change on the natural resources the NPS is charged with tenth of the earth’s human inhabitants (Messerli and Ives protecting in the parks. 1997). Because of their steep environmental gradients and Two of the national parks included in the NPS global complex topography, mountains also have higher rates of change program were Olympic and Glacier National Parks endemism, greater ecological heterogeneity and more bio- (fig. 1). The global change program was transferred to the diversity than many lowland environments (Beniston and U.S. Geological Survey in 1996 but the overall goals re- Fox 1996; Denniston 1995). Equally important, mountains mained the same. In this paper, we summarize some of the are the ‘water towers’ of the world, providing 50% of the freshwater that humans consume (Liniger and others 1998). Mountains contain sacred sites for most of the world’s major religions and are now part of robust tourism and recreation economies. Because mountains were typically last to be developed and are still relatively underdeveloped, they often are refugia for organisms extirpated elsewhere (such as grizzly bear [Ursus arctos]) and are disproportionately well- represented in the world’s protected areas, such as national parks and designated wildernesses. Such wilderness areas In: McCool, Stephen F.; Cole, David N.; Borrie, William T.; O’Loughlin, Jennifer, comps. 2000. Wilderness science in a time of change conference— Volume 3: Wilderness as a place for scientific inquiry; 1999 May 23–27; Missoula, MT. Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-3. Ogden, UT: U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Daniel B. Fagre is Ecologist, U.S. Geological Survey Midcontinent Ecologi- cal Science Center, Glacier National Park, West Glacier, MT 59936 U.S.A. David L. Peterson is Research Biologist, U.S. Geological Survey Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Cascadia Field Station, Box 352100, Figure 1—Olympic and Glacier National Parks were two parks studied Seattle, WA 98195 U.S.A., e-mail: [email protected] under the National Park Service’s Global Change Research Program. 74 USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-3. 2000 responses of Glacier and Olympic National Parks to global- total ice and permanent snow coverage of the Park has scale environmental change and contrast differences in been reduced 72%, and numerous valleys no longer have their responses due to regional sources of disturbance. We any glaciers in their upper reaches. The period of accelerated describe an approach for integrating the effects of differently glacial retreat early this century was correlated with an scaled ecosystem stressors into assessments of the possible upward shift in summer temperatures (fig. 2) and, despite future conditions of mountain wildernesses. considerable variability in summer temperatures and slight increases in precipitation, glaciers continued to shrink. Continued warming is forecast to eliminate all glaciers at Study Areas ____________________ Glacier National Park by 2030 (Hall 1994). Similar glacier retreats have been recorded for the Blue Glacier and others Glacier and Olympic National Parks are both large, wil- in the Olympic Mountains, although the loss of entire gla- derness-dominated parks near the United States-Canada ciers is not as prevalent due to a higher-snowfall climate. border in the northern Rocky Mountains and on the Olympic Glaciers are excellent barometers of climatic change be- Peninsula, respectively (fig. 1). Each Park encompasses cause, unlike biological organisms, they do not adapt to mountains with similar topographic relief, numerous gla- change but merely reflect them. Glaciers also tend to reflect ciers and expansive conifer forests; each is snow-dominated, decadal or longer climatic trends rather than year-to-year acts as the headwaters for its region and contains relatively variation. Thus, the documented glacial recessions in these intact floral and faunal assemblages. Climate is controlled parks are indicators of directional climate change and sug- by dominant air masses, providing Olympic with a maritime gest that other ecosystem changes are likely taking place. climate and Glacier with a more continental climate. Thus, The loss of glaciers in mountain watersheds may have winter temperatures are moderate in the Olympics and cold significant ecological effects because glacial meltwater can in the northern Rockies. Summer precipitation as a propor- be important in providing minimum baseflow and cool tion of annual precipitation is greater in the northern Rockies water temperatures for streams during late summer. This, than in Olympics. Precipitation varies dramatically be- in turn, has implications for temperature-sensitive stream tween westside and eastside locations within each park. For macroinvertebrates and the biota dependent on them. example, precipitation in the Olympic Mountains ranges from >600 cm/yr on Mt. Olympus to only 40 cm/year in the northeastern rainshadow. Precipitation in the northern High-Elevation Forest Responses Rockies varies from 350 cm/yr (westside, high elevation) to 30 cm/yr (eastside, low elevation). This contrast in precipita- Many mountain environments have experienced greater tion over relatively small distances has a profound impact on increases in average temperature than have lowland areas microclimate, vegetation distribution and disturbance re- (Oerlemans 1994). High-elevation tree species have re- gimes (Peterson and others 1997). sponded where temperature and permanent snow coverage Vegetation is dominated by coniferous forest, with species previously limited tree establishment and growth. In Pacific distribution and abundance varying along elevational Northwest mountains, subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) have gradients (extending to alpine vegetation) and from westside been displacing subalpine meadows, particularly since the to eastside (including grassland). The western Olympics are 1930s (Rochefort and Peterson 1996). This rapid regen- dominated at low elevations by temperate rainforests with eration of subalpine fir is most pronounced on the (wet) high biomass and abundant woody debris. Biomass and west side of the mountains during periods of warmer, drier productivity generally are lower in the northern Rockies. climate and on the (dry) east side of the mountains during The parks have 10 coniferous species and several plant periods of cooler, wetter climate. Precipitation is more criti- communities in common, which allows for comparisons of cal than temperature where duration of snowpack limits biotic responses to climatic shifts. length of the growing season (west side) and summer soil moisture limits seedling survival (east side). Analysis of repeat photographs in Glacier National Park has docu- Responses to Climatic Change ____ mented similar invasions of meadows by subalpine fir. If climate becomes warmer and drier during the next century, The environments of both

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us