
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 92,pp. 5027-5031, May 1995 Cell Biology Regulation of the polarization of T cells toward antigen- presenting cells by Ras-related GTPase CDC42 (cell polarity/cytoskeleton/actin/microtubules/cell-cell interactions) LISA STOWERS, DEBORAH YELON, LESLIE J. BERG, AND JOHN CHANT* Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Communicated by Richard M. LosickA Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, February Z 1995 (received for review December 19, 1994) ABSTRACT The mechanisms by which cells rapidly po- were grown in standard medium [RPMI 1640/10% fetal larize in the direction of external signals are not understood. bovine serum (HyClone)/50 ,um 2-mercaptoethanol supple- Helper T cells, when contacted by an antigen-presenting cell, mented with penicillin, streptomycin, and glutamine; ref. 10]. polarize their cytoskeletons toward the antigen-presenting cell Where inhibitors were used, T cells were pretreated for 20 min within minutes. Here we show that, in T cells, the mammalian prior to mixing, and the inhibitor was present during incuba- Ras-related GTPase CDC42 (the homologue of yeast CDC42, tion with antigen-presenting cells. As a control for nonspecific a protein involved in budding polarity) can regulate the effects on viability, the antigen-presenting cells were pre- polarization of both actin and microtubules toward antigen- treated with wortmannin; when this pretreatment was per- presenting cells but is not involved in other T-cell signaling formed, T-cell polarization still occurred. processes such as those which culminate in interleukin 2 Constructs and Transfections. A two-step polymerase chain production. Although T-cell polarization appears dispensable reaction was used to generate two point mutations in human for signaling leading to interleukin 2 production, polarization CDC42 (11). Mutagenic primers were G12V (Gly12-_'Val may direct lymphokine secretion towards the correct antigen- mutation), 5 '-ACCAACAGCCACATCGCCCA-3', and presenting cell in a crowded cellular environment. Inhibitor D57Y (Asp57--Tyr mutation), 5 '-TCTTGGACTTTTT- experiments suggest that phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is TATACTGCAGGG-3'. Flanking primers were 5'-CGG- required for cytoskeletal polarization but that calcineurin GATCCCCGGTGGAGAAGCTG-3' (on the 5' flank) and activity, known to be important for other aspects of signaling, 5 '-CGGAATTCGGCTCTGGAGAGATG-3' (on the 3' is not. Apparent conservation of CDC42 function between flank). Mutant and wild-type products were ligated into yeast and T cells suggests that this GTPase is a general pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) via the BamHI/EcoRI sites underlined. regulator of cytoskeletal polarity in many cell types. Sequence analysis confirmed the predicted mutations. To generate stable transfectants, 10 ,ug of each construct How cells polarize their contents in response to a gradient of and vector control were linearized with Pvu I and purified. external signal is not understood. In yeast, the CDC42 gene is Fragment and 10 ,ug ofcarrier DNAwere added to 1 x 107 2B4 required for establishing an axis of polarity during vegetative cells in Hanks' balanced salt solution (12). Mixtures were division by budding (1, 2). CDC42 encodes a Ras-related electroporated (13) and aliquoted into 96-well culture dishes to GTPase which assembles at the site of bud formation, toward ensure independent origins of clones isolated. After 24 hr, which the cytoskeleton polarizes (2, 3). Yeast cells mutant for G418 (1 mg/ml; GIBCO/BRL) was added to select for CDC42 cannot form a bud because they cannot restrict cell transfectant clones. Ten days later, -15 G418-resistant wells surface growth to the bud site (1). Underlying this targeting per plate were observed, suggesting that clones were derived defect, the actin cytoskeleton is not polarized. A human from single cells. No G418-resistant clones were observed with CDC42 protein, 81% identical to the yeast CDC42, is known carrier DNA alone. Twelve G418-resistant clones were saved (4, 5). The experiments presented in this paper investigate the for each allele in each of two separate transfections. role of human CDC42 GTPase in the cytoskeletal polarization Stimulations, Immunofluorescence, and Scoring Methods. of T cells toward antigen-presenting cells. Conjugation/stimulation and immunofluorescence were per- Polarization of helper T cells toward antigen-presenting formed essentially as described (7, 8). Twenty minutes after cells, as mediated by the interaction of the T-cell antigen mixing of the T cells with antigen-presenting cells, samples were receptor with antigen bound to proteins encoded by the major fixed (3.7% formaldehyde, 40 min, room temperature). The cells histocompatibility complex, is an example of cell polarity that were washed (phosphate-buffered saline plus 0.1% bovine serum is rapidly induced in the direction of an external signal (6-8). albumin, pH 6.5) and permeabilized (10 min, 0.1 mM Triton Interaction between helper T cells and antigen-presenting cells X-100). Microtubules were labeled with rat anti-tubulin mono- is part of the fundamental regulation of the immune response. clonal antibody (YOL1/34; Accurate Antibodies, Westbury, NY) Upon contact between an antigen-presenting cell and a helper followed by fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (Jackson T cell, a tight interface forms between the two cells, and the ImmunoResearch). CH27 antigen-presenting cells were surface- T cell polarizes its cytoskeleton toward the antigen-presenting labeled with fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Jack- cell (6-8). Much is known about the signaling which occurs in son ImmunoResearch). F-actin was labeled with 33 nM rhoda- the T cell in response to antigen presentation (9); however, mine-phalloidin (Molecular Probes) (14). how this signaling controls polarization of the cytoskeleton is Measurement of Interleukin 2 (IL-2) Production. Stimula- not known. tions and measurement of IL-2 production by transfectant clones were performed by standard methods (10, 15). METHODS AND MATERIALS Cell Lines, Growth Medium, and Inhibitor Treatments. RESULTS Murine 2B4 T-cell hybridomas and CH27 B-cell lymphomas T-cell polarization can be studied with a T-cell hybridoma (2B4) and a B-cell lymphoma (CH27) presenting an appro- The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in Abbreviations: IL-2, interleukin 2; PI, phosphatidylinositol. accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. *To whom reprint requests should be addressed. 5027 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 5028 Cell Biology: Stowers et at Proc. Natl. Acad. ScL USA 92 (1995) A B C D FIG. 1. Microtubule-organizing-center position in wild-type and mutant T cells coupled to antigen-presenting cells. (A and B) Untransfected T cells with microtubule-organizing centers polarized. (C and D) CDC42Gl2V-transfected 2B4 T cells exhibiting a defect in microtubule-organizing- center polarization. A and C show indirect immunofluorescence of microtubules with antigen-presenting cells evident from cell surface labeling. B and D show differential interference contrast images of the same cells as in A and C. All panels are oriented with the T cell to the left. (Bar = 15 jLm.) priate antigen (6-8). Within 20 min of combining these two constitutive cytomegalovirus promoter) were stably trans- cell types, 90% of those T cells that have bound to antigen- fected into the murine 2B4 T-cell hybridoma. All three con- presenting cells polarize their microtubule-organizing centers structs and vector control yielded similar numbers of stable to be adjacent to the antigen-presenting cell (Fig. 1 A and B) transfectant clones with indistinguishable growth rates (L.S. and exhibit a concentration of polymerized actin beneath the and D.Y., unpublished data). Thus, the expression of mutant plasma membrane at the site of contact (see Fig. 3 B and C). CDC42 alleles, in this context, did not interfere with cell To investigate the role of CDC42 in the polarized response growth or division. Transfected CDC42 alleles were expressed of T cells, we examined the polarization properties of T cells at levels 2- to 5-fold above endogenous CDC42, as estimated transfected with two alleles of CDC42 predicted to interfere by Western blot analysis, with some variation among clones with the functioning of the endogeneous CDC42. CDC42GJ2V (L.S., unpublished data). is predicted to produce a CDC42 protein defective for GTP Mutant and control T cells were mixed with antigen-presenting hydrolysis and, therefore, locked in the GTP-bound confor- cells, and, after a 20-min incubation, the positions of the micro- mation (16, 17). CDC42D57Y is predicted to produce a CDC42 tubule-organizing centers within the T cells were scored. All protein locked in a conformation mimicking the GDP-bound vector-alone and wild-type CDC42 clones oriented their micro- form; the same mutation in RAS produces a potent dominant- tubule-organizing centers toward antigen-presenting cells with negative effect by sequestering its GDP-GTP exchange factor efficiencies similar to untransfected T cells (Fig. 1 A and B; Fig. (18). Both alleles and wild-type CDC42 (expressed from the 2B). In contrast, all CDC42GJ2Vand CDC42D57Yclones examined A B POSITION OF MICROTUBULE ORGANIZING CENTER (SECTOR NUMBER) 100 Lo FOURTH j) 60 THIRD * FIRST 0iiiS4020 II II lbi b cB co DlC 2B4 VECTOR WT CDC42G 12V CDC42D57Y CLONE FIG. 2. Disruption of microtubule-organizing-center polarization in T cells expressing mutant alleles of CDC42. (A) Scoring the position of the microtubule-organizing center. The position was scored by dividing the T cell into four sections of equal width and assigning a 1, 2, 3, or 4 based on the location of the microtubule-organizing center relative to the antigen-presenting cell. In wild-type 2B4 cells, the microtubule-organizing center is predominantly in region 1 directly adjacent to the antigen-presenting cell-a polarized response. Only 2B4 cells that were coupled to a single CH27 cell were scored. (B) Summary of microtubule-organizing-center positions in wild-type (WT) and CDC42-mutant clones.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages5 Page
-
File Size-