Appendix - the Lorentz Group, Mobius Transformations and the Sky of a Rapidly Moving Observer

Appendix - the Lorentz Group, Mobius Transformations and the Sky of a Rapidly Moving Observer

Appendix - The Lorentz group, Mobius transformations and the sky of a rapidly moving observer 1. The Lorentz group Recall that the group of all isometries of a Minkowski spacetime is the so-called Poincar´egroup. The Lorentz group is the subgroup of the Poincar´egroup formed by all linear isometries, or, equivalently, all isometries which fix the origin. Consequently the Lorentz group determines the relation between the observations of two inertial observers at a given event in a general curved spacetime. If fe0; e1; e2; e3g is an orthonormal basis for the Minkowski 4-spacetime and 0 1 2 3 v = v e0 + v e1 + v e2 + v e3 is a vector, then 2 2 2 2 hv; vi = − v0 + v1 + v2 + v3 0 −1 0 0 0 1 0 v0 1 1 0 1 2 3 B 0 1 0 0 C B v C = v v v v B C B C @ 0 0 1 0 A @ v2 A 0 0 0 1 v3 = xtηx where x is the column vector of v's components and η = diag (−1; 1; 1; 1). If L is a Lorentz transformation and Λ its matrix representation with respect to the chosen basis, then one must have hLv; Lvi = hv; vi , (Λx)t η (Λx) = xtηx , xt ΛtηΛ x = xtηx. Since this must hold for all x 2 R4 and both ΛtηΛ and η are symmetric matrices, we conclude that Proposition 1.1. The Lorentz group is (isomorphic to) O (3; 1) = Λ 2 GL(4) : ΛtηΛ = η . Example 1.2. If R 2 O (3) then 1 0 R = e 0 R satisfies 1 0 −1 0 1 0 RtηR = e e 0 Rt 0 I 0 R −1 0 −1 0 = = = η 0 RtR 0 I and thus Re 2 O (3; 1). It is easy to see that in fact n o Oe(3) = Re 2 O (3; 1) : R 2 O (3) 1 2 is a subgroup of O (3; 1) isomorphic to O (3). For instance, since 0 cos θ 0 − sin θ 1 @ 0 0 0 A 2 O(3) sin θ 0 cos θ for any θ 2 R, we know that 0 1 0 0 0 1 B 0 cos θ 0 − sin θ C B C 2 O(3; 1); @ 0 0 1 0 A 0 sin θ 0 cos θ this Lorentz transformation is said to be a rotation about e3 by an angle θ. Example 1.3. Not all Lorentz transformations are rotations. For instance, defining 0 cosh u 0 0 sinh u 1 B 0 1 0 0 C B = B C @ 0 0 1 0 A sinh u 0 0 cosh u one sees that 0 cosh u 0 0 sinh u 1 0 −1 0 0 0 1 0 cosh u 0 0 sinh u 1 t B 0 1 0 0 C B 0 1 0 0 C B 0 1 0 0 C B ηB = B C B C B C @ 0 0 1 0 A @ 0 0 1 0 A @ 0 0 1 0 A sinh u 0 0 cosh u 0 0 0 1 sinh u 0 0 cosh u 0 − cosh u 0 0 sinh u 1 0 cosh u 0 0 sinh u 1 B 0 1 0 0 C B 0 1 0 0 C = B C B C @ 0 0 1 0 A @ 0 0 1 0 A − sinh u 0 0 cosh u sinh u 0 0 cosh u 0 sinh2 u − cosh2 u 0 0 0 1 B 0 1 0 0 C = B C = η @ 0 0 1 0 A 0 0 0 cosh2 u − sinh2 u and therefore B 2 O(3; 1). This Lorentz transformation is said to be a boost in the e3 direction by a hyperbolic angle u. Let us now recall briefly what is meant by active and passive transformations. Setting E = e0 e1 e2 e3 it is clear that 0 1 2 3 v = v e0 + v e1 + v e2 + v e3 = Ex and consequently Lv = L (Ex) = E (Λx). In particular, LE = Le0 Le1 Le2 Le3 = L (EI) = E (ΛI) = EΛ. Thus in the new orthonormal frame E0 = LE the same vector v has new coordinates x0 such that v = Ex = E0x0 , Ex = EΛx0 3 i.e., x0 = Λ−1x. Thus if Λ represents an active Lorentz transformation L,Λ−1 represents the corre- sponding passive transformation, yielding the coordinates of any vector on the orthonor- mal frame obtained by applying the active transformation to the vectors of the initial orthonormal frame. Example 1.4. Let B represent a boost in the e3 direction by a hyperbolic angle u; then an event with coordinates 0 t 1 B x C B C @ y A z in the initial frame E will have coordinates −1 0 t0 1 0 cosh u 0 0 sinh u 1 0 t 1 B x0 C B 0 1 0 0 C B x C B C = B C B C @ y0 A @ 0 0 1 0 A @ y A z0 sinh u 0 0 cosh u z 0 cosh u 0 0 − sinh u 1 0 t 1 B 0 1 0 0 C B x C = B C B C @ 0 0 1 0 A @ y A − sinh u 0 0 cosh u z 0 t cosh u − z sinh u 1 B x C = B C @ y A z cosh u − t sinh u in the transformed frame E0. In particular, z0 = 0 , z cosh u − t sinh u = 0 , z = t tanh u and we see that the transformed frame corresponds to an inertial observer moving with speed v = tanh u with respect to the inertial observer represented by the initial frame. If Λ 2 O (3; 1) then ΛtηΛ = η ) det ΛtηΛ = det η = −1 , − (det Λ)2 = −1 , det Λ = ±1. Now consider the four matrices I 0 −1 0 I; Σ = ; Θ = ; Ω = ΣΘ, 0 −1 0 I all of which are trivially in O(3; 1). We see that det I = − det Σ = − det Θ = det Ω = 1 and consequently there are matrices in O (3; 1) with either value of the determinant. Since the determinant is a continuous function, it follows that O (3; 1) has at least two connected components. Also, if I, S, T , U are the Lorentz transformations represented by I, Σ, Θ, Ω then Ie0 = Se0 = −T e0 = −Ue0 = e0. 4 Now if L is a Lorentz transformation then define f (L) = he0;Le0i . Since hLe0;Le0i = he0; e0i = −1 one gets from the backwards Schwartz inequality, jf (L)j = jhe0;Le0ij ≥ je0j jLe0j = 1. Since f (I) = f (S) = −f (T ) = −f (U) = −1 we see that I and S cannot belong to the same connected component of the Lorentz group as T and U. Thus O (3; 1) has at least four distinct connected components. We summarize this in the following Proposition 1.5. O (3; 1) is the disjoint union of the four open sets " O+ (3; 1) = fΛ 2 O (3; 1) : det Λ = −f (Λ) = 1g ; # O+ (3; 1) = fΛ 2 O (3; 1) : det Λ = f (Λ) = 1g ; " O− (3; 1) = fΛ 2 O (3; 1) : det Λ = f (Λ) = −1g ; # O− (3; 1) = fΛ 2 O (3; 1) : − det Λ = f (Λ) = 1g : " Informally, O+ (3; 1) is the set of Lorentz transformations which preserve both orienta- # tion and time orientation; O+ (3; 1) is the set of Lorentz transformations which preserve orientation but reverse time orientation (and consequently must reverse space orienta- " tion as well); O− (3; 1) is the set of Lorentz transformations which reverse orientation # but preserve time orientation (hence reversing space orientation); and O− (3; 1) is the set of Lorentz transformations which reverse both orientation and reverse time orientation (hence preserving space orientation). # " " " Exercise 1.6. Show that (i) O+ (3; 1) = TO+ (3; 1); (ii) O− (3; 1) = SO+ (3; 1); (iii) # " O− (3; 1) = UO+ (3; 1). " Of these disjoint open subsets of the Lorentz group only O+ (3; 1) contains the identity, and can therefore be a subgroup. " " Exercise 1.7. Show that O+ (3; 1) is a subgroup of O (3; 1) (O+ (3; 1) is called the group of proper Lorentz transformations). " It is possible to prove that O+ (3; 1) is connected (but not simply connected; as we will " see, π1 O+ (3; 1) = Z2). 2. Stereographic projection Recall that 2 3 2 2 2 S = (x; y; z) 2 R : x + y + z = 1 . The points N = (0; 0; 1) and S = (0; 0; −1) are said to be the North and South poles of S2, and will play special roles in what follows. We define 3 α = (x; y; z) 2 R : z = 0 5 and identify α with C by identifying (x; y; 0) with ζ = x+iy. The stereographic projection ζ : S2n fNg ! C is the map that to each (x; y; z) 2 S2n fNg associates the intersection ζ of the line through (0; 0; 1) and (x; y; z) with α. Thus x + iy ζ (x; y; z) = λ 1 (x2 + y2) 2 where 1 λ x2 + y2 2 = 1 1 − z i.e., x + iy ζ (x; y; z) = . 1 − z Introducing spherical coordinates (r; θ; ') in an appropriate open set of R3 through the inverse coordinate transformation x = r sin θ cos ' y = r sin θ sin ' z = r cos θ we see that S2 is the level set r = 1 and hence (θ; ') are local coordinates in the corre- sponding open set in S2.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    22 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us