Australian Constitutional Law Notes

Australian Constitutional Law Notes

70616: Australian Constitutional Law Notes Table of Contents 1 Characterisation and Interpretation ______________________________________________________ 8 1.1 Characterising a Law – What is it? ___________________________________________________________ 8 1.2 Summary Steps of Characterisation / Problem Solving ___________________________________________ 8 1.2.1 Subject Matter Power: ‘Sufficient Connection’ Test __________________________________________________ 9 1.2.2 Purposive Powers: Proportionality Test ___________________________________________________________ 10 1.3 Incidental Power _______________________________________________________________________ 11 1.3.1 Implied v Express Incidental Power ______________________________________________________________ 12 1.4 Characterisation under Specific Heads of Power _______________________________________________ 12 1.5 Principles of Constitutional Interpretation ___________________________________________________ 12 1.6 Remedies ____________________________________________________________________________ 13 1.6.1 Remedies under s. 75(v) _______________________________________________________________________ 13 1.7 Key Cases ____________________________________________________________________________ 14 1.7.1 Granall v Marrickville Margarine Pty Ltd (1954) ____________________________________________________ 14 1.7.2 Fairfax v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1965) 114 CLR 1, __________________________________________ 14 1.7.3 In Herald & Weekly Times Ltd v Commonwealth (1966) 115 CLR 418, __________________________________ 14 1.7.4 Attorney-General for the Commonwealth v Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd (1913) ________________________ 14 1.7.5 In Murphyores Inc Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1976) 136 CLR 1, ________________________________________ 15 1.7.6 Grain Pool of Western Australia v Commonwealth (2000) ____________________________________________ 15 1.7.7 Australian National Airways v Commonwealth (1945) _______________________________________________ 15 2 Judicial Power ______________________________________________________________________ 16 2.1 Constitution Chapter III The Judicature ______________________________________________________ 16 2.2 Definition of Judicial Power _______________________________________________________________ 17 2.2.1 Judicial Appointment _________________________________________________________________________ 17 2.2.2 Judicial Independence ________________________________________________________________________ 17 2.2.3 Judicial Accountability ________________________________________________________________________ 17 2.2.4 Precedent and Overruling _____________________________________________________________________ 18 2.2.5 Indicators of Judicial Power ____________________________________________________________________ 18 2.2.6 Judicial Review ______________________________________________________________________________ 19 2.2.7 Incidental Judicial Power ______________________________________________________________________ 19 2.2.8 Tribunals ___________________________________________________________________________________ 19 2.2.9 Acting Judges _______________________________________________________________________________ 20 2.3 Main Ideas Summary____________________________________________________________________ 20 2.3.1 Separation of Power __________________________________________________________________________ 20 2.3.2 Persona Designata ___________________________________________________________________________ 21 2.3.3 Usurpation and interference: __________________________________________________________________ 21 2.3.4 Kable Doctrine: Institutional Integrity and State courts operating under Chapter III ________________________ 22 2.4 Key Cases ____________________________________________________________________________ 22 2.4.1 NSW v Cth (Wheats Case) (1915) HCA ____________________________________________________________ 22 2.4.2 Boilermakers Case (1956) _____________________________________________________________________ 23 2.4.3 Waterside Workers‟ Federation of Australia v JW Alexander (1918) ____________________________________ 23 2.4.4 Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for immigration (1992) __________________________________________________ 24 2.4.5 Communist Party Case ________________________________________________________________________ 25 2.4.6 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth ____________________________________________________________ 25 2.4.7 Kable v DPP (NSW) (1996) _____________________________________________________________________ 25 2.4.8 Brandy v Human Rights and Equal opportunity Commission (1996) ____________________________________ 27 1 | P a g e 2.4.9 Fardon v Attorney General (Qld) (2004) __________________________________________________________ 27 2.4.10 South Australia v Totani [2010] HCA 39 ___________________________________________________________ 27 2.4.11 Lane v Morrison (2009) _______________________________________________________________________ 27 2.4.12 International Finance Trust Company Ltd v NSW Crime Commission [2009] ______________________________ 28 2.4.13 Wainhou v NSW [2011] _______________________________________________________________________ 28 2.4.14 Liyanage v The Queen [1967] 1 AC 259 ___________________________________________________________ 28 2.4.15 Thomas v Mowbray (HCA) (2007) _______________________________________________________________ 28 2.4.16 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577 _________________________________ 29 2.4.17 WILSON V MINISTER ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER AFFAIRS (1996) ________________________ 29 2.4.18 Hilton v Wells (1985) _________________________________________________________________________ 29 2.4.19 Grollo v Palmer (1995) ________________________________________________________________________ 30 2.4.20 Momcilovic v The Queen & Ors. [2011] HCA 34 ____________________________________________________ 30 2 | P a g e 5.3.3.1 Examples of some more extreme Valid Transitional Uses ________________________________________ 18 5.3.3.2 Preparation for War ______________________________________________________________________ 18 5.3.3.3 Post War ______________________________________________________________________________ 18 5.3.4 Terrorism and internal Threats _________________________________________________________________ 19 5.3.4.1 Commentary on Thomas v Mowbray and Communist Party Case __________________________________ 19 5.4 Disciplining Defence Force Personnel _______________________________________________________ 19 5.5 Key Cases ____________________________________________________________________________ 20 5.5.1 Woman’s Employment Case (1943)______________________________________________________________ 20 5.5.2 Re Tracey; Ex parte Ryan (1989) ________________________________________________________________ 20 5.5.3 Thomas v Mowbray ___________________________________________________________________________ 21 5.5.4 Farey v Burvett (1916) 21 CLR 433 ______________________________________________________________ 22 5.5.5 Andrews v Howell ____________________________________________________________________________ 23 5.5.6 Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth [1951] (“Communist Party Case) __________________________ 23 6 External Affairs s 51 (xxix) : Both Subject Matter & Purposive __________________________________ 25 6.1 Summary Scope and Characterisation _______________________________________________________ 25 6.1.1 Geographic Externality ________________________________________________________________________ 25 6.1.2 International Comity _________________________________________________________________________ 26 6.1.3 International Concerns ________________________________________________________________________ 26 6.1.4 Implementation of international instruments ______________________________________________________ 26 6.1.4.1 Conformality Doctrine (Current Test) ________________________________________________________ 27 o 2 parts in the conformity doctrine: _________________________________________________________ 27 6.1.4.2 Implementation of treaty in Domestic Laws: __________________________________________________ 27 6.1.4.3 International law’s impact constitutional interpretation:_________________________________________ 28 6.2 Limitations ___________________________________________________________________________ 28 6.3 Key Cases ____________________________________________________________________________ 28 6.3.1 R v Sharkey 1949 ____________________________________________________________________________ 28 6.3.2 R v Burgess; Ex Parte Henry ____________________________________________________________________ 28 6.3.3 Richardson v Forestry Commission ______________________________________________________________ 29 6.3.4 Polyhukhovich v The Commonwealth (the War Crimes case) (1991) ____________________________________ 29 6.3.5 Horta v Cth (1994) ___________________________________________________________________________ 30 6.3.6 XYZ v Cth (2003) : (which affirmed the test in the Industrial Relations Act Case) __________________________ 30 6.3.7 Pape v Commissioner of Taxation _______________________________________________________________ 30 6.3.8 Koowarta v Bjelke-Petersen (1982) ______________________________________________________________ 31 6.3.9 Teoh v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) ____________________________________________ 31 6.3.10 Commonwealth

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us