Regeneration of Little Ice Age Bryophytes Emerging from a Polar Glacier with Implications of Totipotency in Extreme Environments

Regeneration of Little Ice Age Bryophytes Emerging from a Polar Glacier with Implications of Totipotency in Extreme Environments

Regeneration of Little Ice Age bryophytes emerging from a polar glacier with implications of totipotency in extreme environments Catherine La Fargea,1, Krista H. Williamsa, and John H. Englandb aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E9; and bDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E1 Edited by Dale H. Vitt, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 26, 2013 (received for review March 5, 2013) Across the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, widespread ice retreat base of the Greenland Ice Sheet. In contrast, there has been during the 20th century has sharply accelerated since 2004. In a limited amount of data that uses subglacial macrofossils. In Sverdrup Pass, central Ellesmere Island, rapid glacier retreat is terms of land plants (bryophytes and vascular plants), most exposing intact plant communities whose radiocarbon dates studies of glacial ecosystems have focused on viable populations – demonstrate entombment during the Little Ice Age (1550 1850 restricted to communities on supraglacial debris (e.g., refs. 13– AD). The exhumed bryophyte assemblages have exceptional struc- 15). Since the 1960s, numerous field studies have also reported tural integrity (i.e., setae, stem structures, leaf hair points) and emergent subglacial vegetation; however, all have concluded that have remarkable species richness (60 of 144 extant taxa in the exhumed material was dead (4, 5, 16–18). Here, we present Sverdrup Pass). Although the populations are often discolored fi (blackened), some have developed green stem apices or lateral unique eld and experimental evidence for the regeneration of branches suggesting in vivo regrowth. To test their biological via- subglacial populations of LIA bryophytes collected from the bility, Little Ice Age populations emerging from the ice margin margin of the retreating Teardrop Glacier, and address the im- were collected for in vitro growth experiments. Our results include portant biological implications for polar environments. a unique successful regeneration of subglacial bryophytes fol- Prior botanical studies in Sverdrup Pass include biological soil lowing 400 y of ice entombment. This finding demonstrates the crusts, ecological succession, and floristic inventories (extant and totipotent capacity of bryophytes, the ability of a cell to dedif- subglacial). However, the bryophyte record has not been the ferentiate into a meristematic state (analogous to stem cells) focus of a systematic study (4–6, 19–22). In high arctic environ- and develop a new plant. In polar ecosystems, regrowth of bryo- ments the bryophyte flora is comprised of mosses and hepatics, phytetissueburiedbyicefor400ysignificantly expands our lacking hornworts. Given that bryophytes form a major compo- understanding of their role in recolonization of polar landscapes nent of arctic plant diversity, a thorough investigation is war- (past or present). Regeneration of subglacial bryophytes broad- ranted to enhance our understanding of their role in polar fi ens the concept of Ice Age refugia, traditionally con ned to sur- terrestrial ecosystems. To complement our research on bryo- vival of land plants to sites above and beyond glacier margins. phyte systematics and floristics in Sverdrup Pass, the exhumed Our results emphasize the unrecognized resilience of bryo- assemblages from the Teardrop Glacier foreland were carefully phytes, which are commonly overlooked vis-a-vis their contribu- tion to the establishment, colonization, and maintenance of polar sampled. Their structural preservation is exceptional and indicates terrestrial ecosystems. ice-entombment under ideal conditions (Fig. 2). For example, gametophytic tissues have stems with intact leaves (often one cell cryopreservation | subglacial ecosystems layer thick), specialized stem organelles (e.g., paraphyllia, to- SCIENCES mentum, rhizoids), and more rarely, sporophytic tissues consisting ENVIRONMENTAL hroughout the Canadian Arctic Archipelago glaciers have of setae or capsules. Furthermore, their occurrence is widespread ∼ Tundergone widespread retreat during the 20th century, along 1 km of the glacier margin (Fig. 1B). Initial examination in sharply accelerating since 2004 (1, 2). In Sverdrup Pass, central 2007 of exhumed specimens revealed samples with green lateral Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, the Teardrop Glacier has retreated branches or stem apices that suggested regrowth (or in vivo re- ∼200 m from its Little Ice Age limit (LIA, 1550–1850 AD) (Fig. generation). These field observations stimulated three research 1). On the glacier foreland, this former margin is marked by objectives: (i) to conduct a systematic inventory of the exhumed a prominent trimline (3): the sharp outer edge of lighter-toned bryophyte assemblages; (ii) to determine their age; and (iii)to terrain containing sparse vegetation and scattered glacial erratics culture (in vitro) subglacial bryophytes to test their potential for (Fig. 1B). Within the trimline, the vegetation includes both a regrowth after ice-entombment. These objectives address long- chronosequence of recolonizing plants and exhumed, intact standing hypotheses concerning recolonization of deglaciated – assemblages of vascular plants and bryophytes (4 6). The subfossil landscapes (23, 24) and provide fresh insights on totipotent bryophyte assemblages are in pristine condition, resulting from bryophytes in extreme environments. prior entombment by a nonerosive, cold-based glacier margin, common at high latitudes (7). Glaciers are known to contain diverse, cryophilic microbial – Author contributions: C.L.F. designed research; C.L.F. and K.H.W. performed research; C.L.F., communities in supra-, en-, and subglacial environments (8 10). K.H.W., and J.H.E. analyzed data; and C.L.F. and J.H.E. wrote the paper. Consequently, ongoing ice retreat in polar environments provides The authors declare no conflict of interest. source populations for recolonization of raw terrain, including This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. D.H.V. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial subglacial microbes (cyanobacteria, eukaryotic microalgae, and Board. bacteria) (11). Viable subglacial ecosystems at the sediment/ice Data deposition: Voucher specimens are deposited in the Cryptogamic Herbarium (ALTA), interface have focused on such microbial communities and their Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2E9. DNA signatures (9). In a novel approach to subglacial ecosys- 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. fl tems, Willerslev et al. (12) described a diverse ora based on This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. ancient biomolecules (aDNA) extracted from sediments at the 1073/pnas.1304199110/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1304199110 PNAS | June 11, 2013 | vol. 110 | no. 24 | 9839–9844 Downloaded by guest on October 4, 2021 Fig. 1. Location of study site. (A) Map of the Canadian High Arctic and northwest Greenland with ice cover in white. Teardrop Glacier, Sverdrup Pass, Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, is indicated by a red arrow. (B) Oblique aerial view (from the north) of Teardrop Glacier, July 2009. Light-toned perimeter (white arrows) marks the trimline at the limit of the LIA advance. Subglacial samples were collected between the Xs (red) within 10 m of glacial margin. Results margin were similar (SE ≤ 0.3 m/y). Since 2004, the accelerated Median radiocarbon dates (2σ) on three subglacial samples from exposure of the foreland coincides with the sharp increase in the Teardrop Glacier foreland ranged from 404.5 to 614.5 cali- negative mass balance of glaciers and ice caps across the Cana- brated years Before Present (cal y BP), documenting LIA dian Arctic (2). assemblages inside the trim-line (Fig.1B and Table S1). Aula- In addition to the radiocarbon dates from the LIA populations, comnium turgidum provides the youngest date, which is the best the distinction between extant, colonizing bryophytes and the maximum age of the subsequent entombment by ice. Recent exhumed subglacial assemblages is conspicuous on recently ex- retreat rates of the Teardrop Glacier averaged 3.2 m/y (n = 1) posed terrain (Fig. 4). Nonetheless, examination of subglacial between 2004 and 2007 and 4.1 m/y (n = 1) between 2007 and samples indicated lateral branch development or apical stem re- 2009, documenting rapid exposure of subglacial bryophyte generation from LIA populations, suggesting unprecedented assemblages along the margin (Figs. 2 and 3). These rates double regrowth (Fig. 5). In vitro culture assays of the subglacial bryo- earlier calculations (1.6 ± 0.3 SE m/y, n = 9) made by comparing phytes were analyzed and a conservative interpretation of the the 1986 glacier margin to that recorded in the 1959 aerial results has been made. Only cultures that contained the same photograph (19). As well, retreat rates for the 1987–1992 interval species present in the original subglacial sample are considered averaged 1.88 m/y (n = 1) that increased to 2.01 ± 0.13 SE m/y unequivocal examples of regeneration. Furthermore, we excluded (n = 7) from 1992–2004 (5). Despite multiple measurements for all weedy, prolific taxa that occur in the extant flora of the fore- two of the intervals (n = 7 or 9), ice retreat rates along the entire land, regardless of whether they are also represented in the LIA Fig. 2. Subglacial LIA bryophyte populations

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us