University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 1992 A Preliminary Checklist of the Caddisflies (Insecta: richopterT a) of Oklahoma David E. Bowles United States Air Force Arrnstrong Laboratory Michael L. Mathis University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Bowles, David E. and Mathis, Michael L., "A Preliminary Checklist of the Caddisflies (Insecta: richopterT a) of Oklahoma" (1992). Insecta Mundi. 432. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/432 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Vol. 6, No. 1, March 1992 29 A Preliminary Checklist of the Caddisflies (Insecta:. Trichoptera) of Oklahoma David E. Bowles United States Air Force Arrnstrong Laboratory, Occupational Medicine Division, Environmental Biology Branch, Brooks AFB, TX 78235 and Michael L. Mathis Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 Abstract One hundred forty-five species of caddisflies representing 15 families and 46 genera are reported from Oklahoma. Thirty-nine species are new state records. Families having the greatest species richness were Hydroptilidae (44 species), Leptoceridae (31 species), Hydropsychidae (26 species), and Polycentropodidae (13 species). Introduction m above sea level in the northwestern corner of the In 1984, we initiated studies on the distribu- panhandle (Black Mesa) to 99 m above sea level in tion of caddisflies (Trichoptera) in the Interior the southeastern coastal plain. Moreover, western Highlands of the United States. Previously we have Oklahoma is arid, receiving less than 46 cm aver- completed inventories for the mountainous regions age annual rainfall, but the southeastern region of Arkansas (Bowles and Mathis 1989) and Mis- receives on average 142 cm annual rainfall (Gibson souri (Mathis and Bowles 1992). Herein, we pre- 1981). This broad physiographic variation coupled sent an inventory of the caddisfly species known to with a wide variety of aquatic habitats including inhabit Oklahoma, emphasizing the fauna of large rivers, mountain streams, springs, farm mountainous regions of the state. Until now, ponds, reservoirs, and swamps provide a diversity records of caddisflies from Oklahoma have been of trichopteran habitats. scattered in the literature; this study serves to Anthropogenic disturbances to Oklahoma's synthesize these and new data on the distribution natural environment have been numerous and of caddisflies in Oklahoma and provides a baseline sometimes catastrophic. Intensive agriculture has for future studies of these insects in the region. been practiced in the state for decades, and the The natural environment of Oklahoma is effects of livestock grazing have greatly altered the astonishingly diverse. Although most of Oklahoma plains and prairies. All major st~amsand rivers in lies in the Geat Plains region of the United States the state have been altered at least to some extent. and has a topography dominated by prairies and The most dramatic anthropogenic disturbance that plains, numerous mountainous masalso occur in has occurred in the state was the drought- assisted the state (Gibson 1981). Principal mountain sys- dust bowl of the 1920's and 1930's that decimated tems include the Arbuckle, Ouachita, Ozark, and the environment of the panhandle region (Bo- Wichita formations all in the eastern one-half of nnifield 1979). The impact of these environmental the state. In the western one-half, the panhandle disturbances on the regional aquatic insect fauna, region is dominated by numerous buttes and including caddisflies, is not known, but is presum- mesas. Elevation in Oklahoma ranges from 1,524 ed to be significant. Collection Methods corresponding to specific collection sites. The Collection records were obtained from several months of collection are those known for the sources. Extensive ultraviolet (UV)-light trap species in Oklahoma whether documented by us or collections from Latimer County were made avail- reported in the literature. In some instances, able to us by Karl Stephan of Red Oak, Oklahoma. collection dates were not given in original collection These collections were made from September 1987 data. Records taken from the literature are cited at to August 1989. We also made UV-light trap the appropriate species listings. The literature collections throughout the state. Other specimens records several species as being collected in Ok- were obtained through laboratory rearings of field- lahoma, but no additional collection data was collected specimens, taken with Malaise traps, provided. Such general records are listed here only flight-intercept traps, molasses bait traps (Bowles if they represent the original literature citation. et al. 1990), or by sweeping riparian vegetation. Also, many older records were reported only as the Additionally, unpublished records and unidentified nearest town in the county of collection with no material were obtained from the insect collections specific collection location being listed. Nomencla- of the Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS), ture of higher taxa follows that of Weaver and Oklahoma Museum of Natural History (OMNH), Morse (1986). Representative specimens of most and the University of Arkansas Arthropod Museum species identified during the present investigation (UAAM). The majority of species determinations are deposited at the Florida State Collection of were based on male specimens, but females and Arthropods. Other specimens are deposited at the immatures were used in some cases. INI-IS, OMNH, UAAM, and Oklahoma Biological Although the collection records presented here Survey. are predominantly for the eastern mountainous portions of the state, a sufficient number of records Collection Sites were accumulated for the remainder of the state to 1. Adair Co., 5 mi NW Stillwell, Hwy 51, small warrant inclusion in the list. Additional collecting, stream particularly in the western regions, should increase 2. Adair Co., Watts the number of species known from the state con- 3. Adair Co., Westville siderably. 4. Adair Co., 6 mi W Westville, Hwy 62, small stream Species Richness 5. Bryan Co., Blue Oklahoma has a rich caddisfly fauna with 6. Caddo Co., Hinton diverse biogeographical affinities. We report 145 7. Carter Co., Ardmore species of caddisflies representing 15 families and 8. Cherokee Co., Baron Fork Creek, Hwy 51 bridge 46 genera. Thirty-nine species previously were 9. Cherokee Co., Bollen Hollow unreported from Oklahoma. Families exhibiting 10. Cherokee Co., Caney Creek highest richness were the Hydmptilidae (44), 11. Cherokee Co., Cedar Valley Campground, Leptoceridae (31), Hydropsychidae (26), and Poly - Illinois River centsopodidae (13). The number of species reported 12. Cherokee Co., Tahlequah for Oklahoma is comparable to nearby states 13. Choctaw Co., Hugo including Arkansas (160 species; Bowles and 14. Comanche Co., Wichita National Forest Mathis 1989, F'razer and Harris 1991, Frazer et al. 15. Creek Co., Keystone State Park, 16 mi WSW 1991, Unzicker et al. 1970), Colorado (188 species; Tulsa, Keystone Reservoir Herrmann et al. 1986, Ruiter 1990), Missouri (143 16. Delaware Co., no specific location species; Mathis and Bowles 1992), Kansas (104 17. Delaware Co., Flint species; Hamilton and Schuster 1978, 1979,1980, 18. Delaware Co., Flint, Flint Creek Hamilton et al. 1983, Schuster and Hamilton 19. Dewey Co., Taloga 1978), and Texas (91 species; Edwards 1973). 20. Johnston Co., no specific location Caddisfly records for New Mexico are scattered 21. Johnston Co., Pennington Creek at Mill Creek although Waltz and McCafTerty (1983) published a 22. Johnston Co., Reagan, Pennington Creek list of 13 species for that state. 23. Kiowa Co., Lugert In the following list, scientific names are 24. Latimer Co., 6 mi SW Red Oak followed by months of collection and by numbers Vol. 6, No. 1, March 1992 25. Latimer Co., Robber's Cave State Park, Ash C. campyla Ross. April-October. 57 (Gordon 1974)) Creek 11, 18, 24 26. Latimer Co., Robber's Cave State Park, Rough C. gracilis (Banks). June. 57 (Gordon 1974) Canyon C. lasia Ross. April, JuneJuly, October. 43 (Ross 27. Leflore Co., Haw Creek., Hwy 270 bridge 1938a), 6, 22, 23, 42, 45, 51, 56 28. Leflore Co., Heavener, Poteau River, Hwy 270 C. minuscuh (Banks). April-June, August-Septem- 29. Leflore Co., Muse ber. 57 (Gordon 1974), 18,24,28,36,37,38,40 30. Leflore Co., Ouachita National Forest C. oxa (Ross). May, July, September. 10, 18 31. Leflore Co., Page C. paselh Ross. 46 (Nimmo 1987) 32. Marshall Co., Lake Texoma C. pettiti (Banks). April-October. 46 (Ross 1944), 57 33. Mayes Co., Strang (Gordon 1974)) 6, 10, 18, 21, 22, 24,26, 31, 35, 34. McCurtain Co., no specific location 42,44,45, 50 35. McCurtain Co., Broken Bow C. mssi (Gordon). April, July, October. 24 36. McCurtain Co., Eagletown C. smithi Gordon. 46 (Nimmo 1987) 37. McCurtain Co., 1.9 mi NNW Glover, Glover C. speciosa (Banks). 46 (Ross 1944) River C. sordida (Hagen). June, September. 46 (Nimmo 38. McCurtain Co., Hochatown, Mountain Fork 1987)) 11, 18 River Diplectmna modesta Banks. May, June. 46 (Ross 39. McCurtain Co., Idabel 1944)) 24,31 40. McCurtain Co., Smithville, Mountain Fork Hydropsyche alvata Denning. July. 24 River H. arimle Ross. April, June, August-September. 46 41. Murray Co., no specific location (Ross 1944), 22, 24, 37,45 42. Murray Co., Davis, Price's Falls H. betteni Ross. April, June. 1, 26 43. Murray Co., Washita River H. onis Ross. May, July. 46 (Nimmo 1987), 21, 24 44. Murray Co., Sulfur H. reiseni Denning. March-April, July-August. 45 45. Murray Co., Turner Falls State Park, Honey (Denning 1975) Creek H. mssi Flint, Voshell and Parker. June, August. 46. Oklahoma, no specific location 11, 18, 24 47. Ottawa Co., Six Mile Creek H. scalari$ Hagen. June, August. 46 (Ross 1944), 48. Ottawa Co., Wyandotte 21.22 49.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages8 Page
-
File Size-