U.S. 9/Garden State Parkway Corridor Study

U.S. 9/Garden State Parkway Corridor Study

U.S. 9/Garden State Parkway Corridor Study Draft Final Report Prepared for: South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization Vineland, New Jersey Prepared by: The Louis Berger Group, Inc. East Orange, New Jersey In association with: CH Planning, Ltd. New Jersey April 2004 U.S. 9/Garden State Parkway Corridor Study South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1 1.1 Regional Setting...........................................................................................1 1.2 Study Location.............................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose of the Study ....................................................................................3 1.4 Relationship to Existing Documents............................................................4 1.5 Coordination With Other Studies/Projects...................................................5 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................7 2.1 Socioeconomics ...........................................................................................7 2.1.1 Population........................................................................................7 2.1.1.1 Population Change...............................................................7 2.1.2 Employment.....................................................................................8 2.1.3 Environmental Justice......................................................................9 2.1.3.1 USDOT Criteria...................................................................9 2.1.3.2 Study Methodology and Goals...........................................10 2.1.3.3 U.S. 9/Garden State Parkway Study Area .........................11 2.2 Land Use....................................................................................................14 2.3 Traffic Conditions......................................................................................14 2.3.1 Traffic Data Collection..................................................................14 2.3.2 Volume Development ....................................................................17 2.3.3 Capacity and Operational Analysis................................................18 2.3.3.1 Methodology......................................................................18 2.3.3.2 Locations............................................................................23 2.3.3.3 Results................................................................................25 2.3.4 Field Observations.........................................................................30 2.4 Other Transportation Modes......................................................................31 2.4.1 Pedestrian/Bicycles........................................................................31 2.4.1.1 U.S. 9.................................................................................31 2.4.1.2 Roosevelt Boulevard..........................................................32 2.4.1.3 Bay Avenue........................................................................32 2.4.2 Transit ............................................................................................33 2.4.2.1 Rail Service........................................................................33 2.4.2.2 Bus Service........................................................................33 2.4.3 Park-and-Ride................................................................................34 2.5 Physical Conditions ...................................................................................35 2.5.1 NJDOT Management Systems.......................................................35 2.5.1.1 Safety.................................................................................35 2.5.1.2 Pavement............................................................................42 2.5.1.3 Drainage/Flooding.............................................................45 2.5.1.4 Structures...........................................................................46 The Louis Berger Group, Inc. Draft Final Report Page i U.S. 9/Garden State Parkway Corridor Study South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page 2.5.2 Other ............................................................................................49 2.5.2.1 Signage...............................................................................49 2.5.2.2 Geometrics .........................................................................50 2.6 Environmental Constraints.........................................................................57 3.0 FUTURE NO-BUILD CONDITIONS ...............................................................58 3.1 Socioeconomics .........................................................................................58 3.1.1 Population......................................................................................58 3.1.2 Employment...................................................................................59 3.1.3 Environmental Justice....................................................................60 3.1.3.1 Upper Township.................................................................60 3.1.3.2 Ocean City.........................................................................60 3.1.3.3 Somers Point City..............................................................61 3.2 Land Use ............................................................................................61 3.3 Traffic Conditions......................................................................................61 3.3.1 Growth Rate...................................................................................61 3.3.1.1 Garden State Parkway........................................................62 3.3.1.2 U.S. 9/Garden State Parkway Study Area .........................62 3.3.1.3 Conclusion.........................................................................63 3.3.2 Volume Development ....................................................................63 3.3.3 Capacity and Operational Analysis................................................66 3.3.3.1 Signalized Intersections.....................................................66 3.3.3.2 Unsignalized Intersections.................................................70 3.3.3.3 Two-Lane Highway Sections.............................................71 3.3.3.4 Basic Freeway Segments ...................................................71 3.3.4 Travel Characteristics....................................................................72 3.4 Other Transportation Modes......................................................................72 3.4.1 Pedestrians/Bicycles......................................................................72 3.4.2 Transit ............................................................................................72 3.4.2.1 Rail Initiatives....................................................................72 3.4.2.2 Bus Initiatives....................................................................72 3.4.3 Park-and-Ride................................................................................72 4.0 STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS ........................................................................73 4.1 General ............................................................................................73 4.2 U.S. 9 ............................................................................................73 4.2.1 Segment South of Route 50 ...........................................................73 4.2.2 Route 50 (M.P. 23.76)....................................................................73 4.2.3 Segment from Route 50 to Tuckahoe Road (CR 631) (M.P. 23.76 -28.57)........................................................................73 4.2.4 Tuckahoe Road (CR 631) (M.P. 28.57).........................................74 The Louis Berger Group, Inc. Draft Final Report Page ii U.S. 9/Garden State Parkway Corridor Study South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page 4.2.5 Segment from Tuckahoe Road (CR 631) to Roosevelt Boulevard (CR 623) (M.P. 28.57-28.79) .......................................75 4.2.6 Roosevelt Boulevard (CR 623) (M.P. 28.79) ................................75 4.2.7 Tuckahoe Road Extension (CR 662) (M.P. 29.2)..........................76 4.2.8 Segment from Roosevelt Boulevard (CR 623) to the Beesley’s Point Bridge (M.P. 28.79 -30.7)....................................76 4.2.9 Beesley’s Point Bridge (M.P. 30.7 – M.P. 31.9) ...........................76 4.2.10 Segment from the Beesley’s Point Bridge to Mays Landing Road (CR 559) (M.P. 30.7 – 32.64) ................................77 4.2.11 Mays Landing Road (CR 559) (M.P. 32.64) .................................77 4.2.12 Segment from Mays Landing Road to Route 52/Laurel Drive (M.P. 32.64 -33.23)........................................................................78 4.2.13 Route 52/Laurel Drive (M.P. 33.23)..............................................78 4.3 Garden State Parkway................................................................................78 4.3.1 Interchange 20 (M.P. 20.25)..........................................................78 4.3.2 Segment from Interchange 20 to Interchange 25 (M.P. 20.25

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    180 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us