A Gene-Based Genetic Linkage Map of the Collared Flycatcher

A Gene-Based Genetic Linkage Map of the Collared Flycatcher

Copyright Ó 2008 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.088195 A Gene-Based Genetic Linkage Map of the Collared Flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) Reveals Extensive Synteny and Gene-Order Conservation During 100 Million Years of Avian Evolution Niclas Backstro¨m,* Nikoletta Karaiskou,†,1 Erica H. Leder,† Lars Gustafsson,‡ Craig R. Primmer,† Anna Qvarnstro¨m‡ and Hans Ellegren*,2 *Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden, †Division of Genetics and Physiology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland and ‡Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden Manuscript received February 17, 2008 Accepted for publication May 1, 2008 ABSTRACT By taking advantage of a recently developed reference marker set for avian genome analysis we have constructed a gene-based genetic map of the collared flycatcher, an important ‘‘ecological model’’ for studies of life-history evolution, sexual selection, speciation, and quantitative genetics. A pedigree of 322 birds from a natural population was genotyped for 384 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 170 protein-coding genes and 71 microsatellites. Altogether, 147 gene markers and 64 microsatellites form 33 linkage groups with a total genetic distance of 1787 cM. Male recombination rates are, on average, 22% higher than female rates (total distance 1982 vs. 1627 cM). The ability to anchor the collared flycatcher map with the chicken genome via the gene-based SNPs revealed an extraordinary degree of both synteny and gene-order conservation during avian evolution. The great majority of chicken chromosomes corre- spond to a single linkage group in collared flycatchers, with only a few cases of inter- and intra- chromosomal rearrangements. The rate of chromosomal diversification, fissions/fusions, and inversions combined is thus considerably lower in birds (0.05/MY) than in mammals (0.6–2.0/MY). A dearth of repeat elements, known to promote chromosomal breakage, in avian genomes may contribute to their stability. The degree of genome stability is likely to have important consequences for general evolutionary patterns and may explain, for example, the comparatively slow rate by which genetic incompatibility among lineages of birds evolves. ENOMICS is in a phase where new technology at the chromosomal level sets the stage for the evolu- G allows genome characterization beyond that of tionary processes, which occur on the level of the phe- traditional model organisms and species of medical or notype. agricultural interest. For example, genomic analyses of Reshuffling of chromosomal segments, through nonmodel species holds great promise for dissecting translocations and inversions, is an integral part of the genetic background to fitness traits in natural genome evolution. However, it is clear that the rate of populations, to adaptive population divergence, to spe- rearrangement differs radically among lineages as well ciation, and to other key aspects of evolutionary biology as on a temporal scale (Kohn et al. 2006; Ferguson- (Ellegren and Sheldon 2008). Genomic character- Smith and Trifonov 2007). From comparative map- ization of new and phylogenetically divergent lineages ping of chicken and different mammals it was suggested has the additional benefit that it provides the necessary that the rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the comparative perspective for addressing the evolution avian lineage is very low (Burt et al. 1999). This has of genome organization. Specifically, with genetic maps subsequently been confirmed through analyses of or genome sequence information available across taxa, vertebrate genome sequence data, including chicken the broad-scale pattern of genome and chromosomal (Bourque et al. 2005), the only bird that has had its evolution can be investigated. This, in turn, opens genome sequenced to date (International Chicken the possibility of investigating to what extent evolution Genome Sequencing Consortium 2004). Moreover, evidence for an unusually stable avian karyotype with few interchromosomal rearrangements has been ob- 1Present address: Department of Genetics, Development and Molecular tained by cross-species chromosome painting or the use Biology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box of other types of in situ hybridization probes (Shetty 54, 124 Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece. et al. 1999; Shibusawa et al. 2001, 2004a,b; Raudsepp 2Corresponding author: Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolution- uttenbach asai ary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyva¨gen 18D, SE-752 36 et al. 2002; G et al. 2003; K et al. 2003; Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected] Derjusheva et al. 2004; Schmid et al. 2005; Itoh et al. Genetics 179: 1479–1495 ( July 2008) 1480 N. Backstro¨m et al. 2006; Fillon et al. 2007; Griffin et al. 2007; Nishida- MATERIALS AND METHODS Umehara et al. 2007). However, these experiments Species samples and DNA extraction: Blood samples were rarely have the resolution for detecting intrachromoso- collected from collared flycatcher (F. albicollis) families breed- mal or small-scale interchromosomal rearrangements. ing on the Baltic islands O¨ land and Gotland and DNA was Genetic maps are available for turkey (Reed et al. extracted by a standard proteinase K digestion/phenol– 2005) and quail (Kayang et al. 2006), two agricultural chlorophorm purification protocol. The mapping pedigree species that are closely related to chicken as members of consisted of 24 half-sib families with a few interconnections and 11 F2’s, in total 322 birds (supplemental Table 1) after the order Galliformes. However, a lack of genetic excluding all recognized extra-pair offspring (see below). markers, in particular those informative for compara- Marker genotyping: In a previous resequencing effort, we tive mapping, has been a major obstacle to linkage anal- surveyed 200 collared flycatcher genes for intronic diversity yses of bird species belonging to other orders. As a among 10 unrelated individuals from the same population as the mapping pedigree, which uncovered 904 segregating consequence, linkage mapping in natural bird popula- ackstro¨m ansson sites (B et al. 2008). From this, 341 single nucleotide tions is still in its infancy. H et al.(2005)developed polymorphisms (SNPs) with a minor allele frequency of a partial microsatellite-based linkage map (58 markers) .0.1 and representing the majority of all genes screened in the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus), a were selected for genotyping in the pedigree; for many species from the order Passeriformes, the largest and genes, more than one SNP from the same intron were ecologically most well-studied group of birds. This study included. An additional 43 SNPs were obtained from 21 different genes previously screened for variability in collared also made the unexpected observation that the recom- flycatchers (Borge et al. 2005) (Table 1). The total of 384 SNPs bination rate was twice as high in females as in males, were genotyped using the Golden Gate Assay (Fan et al. 2003) which is in contrast to the prevailing trend of recombi- from Illumina (San Diego) at the SNP Technology Plat- nation usually being lower in the heterogametic sex (in form, Uppsala University (http://www.medsci.uu.se/molmed/ birds, males are ZZ and females ZW). Backstro¨m et al. snpgenotyping/index.htm). The overall genotype call rate was (2006) reported on a gene-based linkage map of the Z 95.7% and the reproducibility was 100% according to dupli- cate analysis of 5.4% (7218/132,848) of the genotypes. The chromosome of another passerine species, the collared quality of the genotype data was further assessed by testing for flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). The Z chromosome was Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) using the chi-square found to be completely syntenic between collared fly- distribution for each assay. All SNPs conformed to HWE. catcher and chicken. Subsequently, Dawson et al.(2007) Seventy microsatellites were isolated from the closely re- eder developed an extended great reed warbler map and lated pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca:L et al. 2008). Sixty-three of these markers, as well as five EST-linked micro- found a high degree of chromosomal conservation when satellites and nine microsatellites from other passerines compared to chicken (see also A˚ kesson et al. 2007). (Karaiskou et al. 2008), were PCR multiplexed in sets of six We have recently adopted the comparative anchor- to nine loci using 30 ng of DNA per reaction. Each PCR tagged sequences approach (Lyons et al. 1997) to de- multiplex could be analyzed on a single run of an ABI3130xl (Applied Biosystems). Detailed PCR multiplex protocols and velop a genomewide, gene-based marker resource for araiskou ackstro¨m electrophoresis details can be found in K and avian comparative mapping (B et al. 2008). Primmer (2007). This set of 2001 markers target conserved exonic Data analysis: Microsatellites were scored using the Gene- sequences in genes spread over all chromosomes cur- Mapper software (Applied Biosystems). SNPs from the same rently covered in the chicken genome assembly, with a intron were combined into haplotypes using the available mean marker interval of 4 Mb. The uniform distribution pedigree information. For both types of markers, missing data points of parents were inferred from the haplotypes of of these markers across the chicken genome means offspring and mates when possible.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us