WP3 Case Study Reporting CH

WP3 Case Study Reporting CH

RETHINK is a research project funded through RURAGRI RURAGRI is an ERA-NET supported by the European Commission under the 7 th Framework Programme (FP 7, CA 235175) RETHINK Rethinking the links between farm modernization, rural development and resilience in a world of increasing demands and finite resources Case study report "Sub-urban food production systems in a Swiss agglomeration " (Switzerland) D3.3 | The example of the milk supply chain in Bern | FINAL/ 18 May 2015 David Bourdin, Astrid Gerz, Sophie Réviron, Martina Siegenthaler Case Study " Sub-urban food production systems in a Swiss agglomeration." / FINAL/ 18 May 2015 2 1. Introduction: definition of the social-ecological system studied ...................................................... 4 1.11.11.1 What is the case study about and who are the key actors? ................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................... 444 1.1.1 The territory and the farmland characteristics ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 The proximity of the agglomeration provides interested farmers with opportunities of diversification and innovation .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.3 Only a minority of farms have developed strong direct economic links with the population ...................................... 8 1.1.4 Some examples of initiatives focusing on direct links with consumers in the agglomeration of Bern .................. 10 1.21.21.2 Demands and resource constraints that are addressed by the casecase----studystudy ........................................................................................................................ 111111 1.31.31.3 CrossCross----cuttingcutting themes analysed inin----depthdepth in the case study ................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... 121212 1.41.41.4 Methodological approach ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ................................................................................................ ........................... 121212 2. Results and discussion: addressing constraints, responding to change .......................................... 14 2.12.12.1 'Resilience''Resilience'----relatedrelated findings ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ............................................................................................... .................. 141414 2.1.1 Adaptability and transformability ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.2 Autonomy and (network) embeddedness ..................................................................................................................................... 21 2.1.3 Development over time and adaptability ....................................................................................................................................... 22 2.22.22.2 'Prosperity' --- related findings ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ............................................................................................. ................ 242424 2.32.32.3 'Governance''Governance'----relatedrelated findings ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ............................................................................................ ............... 262626 2.3.1 The role and interests of key private actors .................................................................................................................................. 26 2.3.2 Organizational characteristics of the most relevant governance mechanism(s) ........................................................... 35 2.3.3 The role of the institutional environment ...................................................................................................................................... 39 2.3.4 The role of newly formed and/or innovative governance models ....................................................................................... 41 2.42.42.4 'knowledge and learning'learning'----relatedrelated finfindingsdings ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ........................... 414141 2.4.1 Knowledge needs ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 2.4.2 Knowledge sources ................................................................................................................................................................................. 42 2.4.3 Effective forms of learning and knowledge sources: ................................................................................................................. 43 2.52.52.5 Interrelations between these different dimensions ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................... .................. 444444 2.5.1 Interrelations between 'knowledge & learning' and 'governance' ....................................................................................... 44 2.5.2 Interrelations between 'prosperity' and 'resilience' .................................................................................................................. 44 2.5.3 Contribution of 'knowledge & learning' and 'governance' to 'prosperity' and 'resilience' ......................................... 44 3. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 45 3.13.13.1 What are the main lessons learned from the case study? ................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................... 454545 3.23.23.2 Particularly interesting issues for the comparative analysis ................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................... 474747 3.33.33.3 Implications for future research and policy ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ....................... 474747 4. References ................................................................................................................................. 48 Case Study " Sub-urban food production systems in a Swiss agglomeration." / FINAL/ 18 May 2015 3 List of abbreviations BLW (Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft): National Ministry of Agriculture CSA: Community Supported Agriculture FIBL: Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau GDP: gross domestic product LANAT (Amt für Landwirtschaft und Natur Bern): Ministry for Agriculture and Nature LOBAG (Landwirtschaftliche Organisation Bern und angrenzende Gebiete): Agricultural Organisation in Bern and surrounding Areas OGG (Oekonomische und Gemeinnützige Gesellschaft Kanton Bern): Organisation for Agriculture and Society PDO: Protected designation of origin RKBM (Regionalkonferenz Bern Mittelland): Organisation for Regional Planning SAK (Standardarbeitskraft): state work force SBV (Schweizerischer Bauernverband): Swiss Farmers Association SFSC: short food supply chains Case Study " Sub-urban food production systems in a Swiss agglomeration." / FINAL/ 18 May 2015 4 1. Introduction: definition of the social-ecological system studied 1.1 What is the case

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    54 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us