2Nd Owl Symposium Size, Dimorphism, and Related

2Nd Owl Symposium Size, Dimorphism, and Related

2nd Owl Symposium Size, Dimorphism, and Related Characteristics of Ciccaba Owls From Guatemala Richard P. Gerhardt and Dawn McAnnis Gerhardt1 Abstract.—Tropical owls, being poorly studied, have been excluded from discussions of reversed size dimorphism. As part of a breeding and food habits study, we weighed and measured 20 Mottled Owls (Ciccaba virgata) and a mated pair of Black-and-white Owls (C. nigrolineata) in northern Guatemala. Mottled Owls exhibited pro- nounced dimorphism with respect to body mass, wing chord, and tail length. A mated pair of Black-and-white Owls was also quite dimorphic with respect to body mass. Mate choice in six pairs of Mottled Owls was not correlated with size (mass or wing chord). Since both species are highly insectivorous, they do not fit an alleged trend among owls toward increasing dimorphism with increased reliance on vertebrate prey. Indeed, our results are at odds with important assumptions or predictions of numerous hypotheses regarding the evolution of reversed size dimorphism in owls. Whereas in most bird species, males are larger suggested that these be taken during the than females, in owls (Strigiformes) and other breeding season, since most hypotheses link raptors (Falconiformes) females are generally the role of RSD to this critical period of the the larger sex. More than 20 hypotheses have annual life cycle. Other measurements that been advanced to explain the evolution of this have been analyzed for degree of dimorphism reversed size dimorphism, or RSD (for a sum- include wing length, tail length, bill length, mary, see Andersson and Norberg 1981, tarsal length, and foot span (Earhart and Mueller and Meyer 1985, and Mueller 1986). Johnson 1970, Marti 1990, McGillivray 1987, To date, owl data used for advancing and Mueller 1986). testing these hypotheses and associated assumptions and predictions have come from Between 1989 and 1992, we conducted studies of those species living in northern research on two sympatric species, the Mottled temperate zones. Such studies have almost Owl (Ciccaba virgata) and the Black-and-white exclusively dealt with 18 North American owl Owl (C. nigrolineata), in Tikal National Park in species and 13 owl species that breed in Guatemala (Gerhardt 1991; Gerhardt et al. Europe (a total of 24 species, since 7 are found 1994a, 1994b). We studied the breeding on both continents). This temperate bias is biology, home range (Gerhardt et al. 1994b), natural enough, since little information on owls and food habits (Gerhardt et al. 1994a) of these outside these areas is available. None-the-less, tropical owls, and recorded body mass and this bias may have important implications on other measurements as we captured them. In the validity and generality of the resulting this paper, we analyze those measurements hypotheses. with respect to dimorphism, and then discuss the implications of our findings upon various Most researchers and theorists agree that the hypotheses regarding the causes and roles of most valid field measurement for discussions of RSD in owls. dimorphism is body mass (Amadon 1977, Cade 1960, Earhart and Johnson 1970, McGillivray METHODS 1987, Mueller 1986), and McGillivray (1987) Trapping methods are described in Gerhardt et 1 Richard P. Gerhardt and Dawn McAnnis al. (1994b). All measurements were taken from Gerhardt, The Peregrine Fund, Inc., 5666 West breeding adult owls captured during the period Flying Hawk Lane, Boise, Idaho 83709. beginning 1 month prior to egg-laying and Present address: 341 NE Chestnut, Madras, ending at fledging of the young. Female body Oregon 97741. masses used in this analysis include only those 190 taken during the nestling period. Owls were Data on North American owls used for compar- weighed to the nearest gram using a Pesola ison were taken from Earhart and Johnson spring scale. Flattened wing chord and tail (1970). length (from insertion to tip) were measured to the nearest mm. Measurements are reported as RESULTS means ± standard deviation. We applied to these measurements the dimorphism index Female Mottled Owls (334.9 ± 22.0 g, N = 11) (D.I.) devised by Storer (1966), D.I. = 100 (mean weighed significantly more than males (239.7 ± size of female - mean size of male) / 0.5 (mean 13.3 g, N = 7; U = 77; p < 0.001). D.I. for (the size of female + mean size of male); we used the cube root of) body mass was 12.05. Females cube root of body mass to make the resulting also had significantly longer wing chords (24.6 index comparable to the indices of the linear ± 0.6 cm, N = 12 vs. 23.3 ± 0.6 cm, N = 8; U = measurements (Amadon 1943, Earhart and 96, p < 0.001) and tails (15.0 ± 1.0 cm, N = 11 Johnson 1970). We also compared measure- vs. 14.1 ± 0.6 cm, N = 7; U = 71, p = 0.002). ments between sexes using the Mann-Whitney Dimorphism indices for wing chord and tail “U” test (Siegel 1956), and applied Spearman length were 5.43 and 6.19, respectively. rank correlations (Zar 1984) to size data from mated pairs to test for a linear relationship. The female Black-and-white Owl had a body mass of 535 g, a wing chord of 29.3 cm, and a We weighed eggs (to the nearest 0.5 g) within the tail length of 18.7 cm. Her mate had a body first week after they were laid, and checked mass of 436 g, a wing chord of 28.6 cm, and a clutch sizes periodically (Gerhardt et al. 1994b). tail length of 16.5 cm. These data yield We assessed diet through analyzing pellets dimorphism indices of 6.81 (cube root of body collected from under roosts and near nests, and mass), 2.42 (wing chord), and 3.13 (tail). from direct observation and prey remains in nests (Gerhardt et al. 1994a). The percentage of The dimorphism of body mass of these two pellets containing parts of prey taxa are species is compared graphically with those of reported. North American owls in figure 1. Figure 1.—Cube root of female body mass vs. D.I. for North American owls and two CUBE ROOT OF BODY MASS Ciccaba owls. 191 2nd Owl Symposium Mate choice in six pairs of Mottled Owls was Black-and-white Owls captured bats. Both not correlated with body mass (rs = -0.147, p > species were highly insectivorous, however, and 0.5) or wing chord (rs = -0.135, p > 0.5), as no elytra and other hard beetle parts appeared in linear relationship existed for these measure- most pellets. Indeed, we observed other, more ments between mated birds. soft-bodied insects being eaten that were absent from pellets (and thus under-represented). Mean mass of Mottled Owl eggs was 28.2 ± 1.8 Nonetheless, 98 percent of Mottled Owl pellets g (N = 16), and that of Black-and-white Owl contained insect matter, and 44 percent con- eggs was 33.8 ± 2.3 g (N = 4). Mean clutch size tained only insect parts. Similarly, all Black- for Mottled Owls was 2.2 ± 0.14 eggs (N = 13); and-white Owl pellets contained insect parts, each Black-and-white Owl clutch consisted of although 74 percent also contained some just one egg (N = 4) (Gerhardt et al. 1994b). vertebrate remains (Gerhardt et al. 1994a). Mottled Owl eggs and clutches weighed 8.4 Figure 2 compares these two species, with percent and 18.5 percent of mean female body respect to dimorphism and diet, with North mass, respectively. Black-and-white Owl eggs American owls. (and, therefore clutches) weighed 6.3 percent of female body mass. DISCUSSION These two Ciccaba species differed in the mam- With respect to body mass, these Mottled Owls malian component of their diets (Gerhardt et al. exhibited the most pronounced dimorphism yet 1994a). Mottled Owls ate rodents, whereas documented among owls (fig. 1; Andersson and Figure 2.—Relationship between food habits and dimorphism of North American owls (adapted from Earhart and Johnson 1970) with Ciccaba virgata and C. nigrolineata added. Diet categories are as follows: (A) feeds exclusively on arthropods; (B) primarily arthropods, few vertebrates; (C) arthtropods and vertebrates in equal numbers; (D) primarily vertebrates, few arthropods; (E) exclusively vertebrates. 192 Norberg 1981, Earhart and Johnson 1970, nests generally experience lower predation Mueller 1986), with the possible exception of rates than open nests, cavity-nesting species the European form of Aegolius funereus, should exhibit little dimorphism. Again, Tengmalm’s Owl (Lundberg 1986, Korpimäki Mottled Owls bely this notion. 1986). Extent of weight dimorphism might have been less if body mass had been Proponents of the starvation hypothesis measured during the non-breeding season. (Korpimäki 1986, Lundberg 1986) have used Most hypotheses concerning the role and data primarily from European owl species to evolution of RSD are associated with aspects of support their arguments. Simply stated, this breeding biology, however, and we agree with hypothesis holds that larger females are better McGillivray (1987) that this is the most able to withstand harsh breeding season appropriate time for measuring body mass. conditions, particularly in the early stages and Given that weights were taken during the at higher latitudes, and can incubate and breeding season, our results were conservative; brood longer during periods of poor or inconsis- we used female body masses only from the tent prey deliveries by males. During 4 years of nestling period (higher values would likely have research in Guatemala, the harshest breeding been obtained pre-laying and during season conditions were two consecutive nights incubation) and male masses from throughout of rain, with temperatures near 17˚ C. More- the breeding season (male weights would likely over, during such conditions, prey remained have been lower had we used only nestling abundant and active.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us